[Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion

Miwa Fujii miwa at apnic.net
Tue Oct 27 03:06:00 EDT 2015


Hi Izumi, 

Thanks for your clarification.

Miwa

On 27/10/2015 4:59 pm, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Hi Miwa,
>
>
>Thank you for your help in reaching out to private sectors in Japan.
>I'm sure Susan will get back to you with a comprehensive response - my
>response while waiting for her time zone to be online.
>
>
>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>
>The final document will be produced by a consultant engaged by the IGF
>Secretariat based on the discussions within our group.
>Our consultant is Wim Degezelle. It will then be published on the IGF
>microwebsite for the Best Practices.
>
>Best Practices documents from 2014 may give you some idea (listed in
>"Categories") : 
>http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/best-practice-forums
>
>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>
>Yes, that's the idea, to be distributed worldwide.
>
> - Discussed at the IGF in João Pessoa, Brazil with global participants
>(10 to 13 November )
> - Published on the IGF micro website available for anyone to see.
> - We reach out to bodies/organisations in various regions. They can help
>us proactively share with their respective stakeholders.
>
>
>> - How do you distribute this document?
>
>As described about, we reach out to various bodies/organisations after
>posting on the IGF microsite.
>The group hasn't yet discussed the specific list of organisations to
>reach out. 
>
>Whether this is just for online sharing, or we would like to have some
>face to face opportunities to present them in any other forums than IGF,
>hasn't been discussed, including its needs.
>
>> - Who will receive the document?
>
>IGF secretariat will receive the document, but they publish it on the
>website is open for anyone to read.
>
>If you mean the target reader, one of the stakeholders identified is
>governments. 
>The section on the private sector would serve as a good reference to
>those who are considering to makde a decision on IPv6 deployment in their
>networks as well.
>
>Do people see anyone else to add?
>
>Given the government is considered as one of the readers, I suspect it
>would make sense to consider governmental organisations as a potential
>target of outreach.
>Also to national and regional IGFs are where most key update on the
>global IGF are shared.
>
>Suggestions are certainly welcome, if you know any
>community/body/organization who would find value in having this document
>shared.
>
>
>I hope this helps!
>
>
>
>Izumi
>
>On 2015/10/27 9:20, Miwa Fujii wrote:
>> Hi Susan,
>> 
>> Hi Susan,
>> 
>> I¹ve asked some of orgs in Japan that have already implemented IPv6 to
>>provide short texts on 4) Lessen leant from the private sector. They are
>>putting the request through the Internal decision making process, and I
>>got the following questions.
>> 
>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>> - How do you distribute this document?
>> - Who will receive the document?
>> 
>> I¹d appreciate your input.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> miwa
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Bp_ipv6 
>><bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org>>
>> on behalf of Susan Chalmers
>><susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>
>> Date: Thursday, 22 October 2015 10:39 am
>> To: IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>>
>> Subject: [Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> During today's call we addressed a few structural elements of the
>>paper, including highlighting the similarities in best practices between
>>ISPs and content providers, and acknowledging that enterprises are a
>>different story.
>> 
>> We also decided to remove the case study section due to time
>>constraints, and to emphasize in the conclusion that the efforts of all
>>stakeholders combine to produce the best possible output, as opposed
>>groups acting independently.
>> 
>> Lastly, we decided to add a brief section on research and education
>>networks.
>> 
>> Taking this into account, I've rearranged the outline, provided below.
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone for their contributions today.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Susan
>> 
>> 4)Lessons from the Private Sector
>> 
>> 
>> In this section we look at best practices identified within private
>>sector organisations, beginning with ISPs and content providers, and
>>ending with enterprises.
>> 
>> 
>> A.ISPs and content providers
>> 
>> 
>> i)Review existing infrastructure
>> 
>> ii)Determine whether vendors are IPv6-ready
>> 
>> iii)Training for employees
>> 
>> iv)Deploy public-facing IPv6 services
>> 
>> v)Migrate to IPv6 on internal networks
>> 
>> vi)Set internal deadlines
>> 
>> vii)Reach out to customers
>> 
>> viii)Consider different approaches to pricing (for ISPs)
>> 
>> ix)Plan for the unexpected
>> 
>> 
>> B.Enterprises
>> 
>> 
>> 5)Research and Education Networks (NRENs)
>> 
>> 
>> A.About NRENs (including University service provider relationship)
>> 
>> B.Examples
>> 
>> i) CERNET
>> 
>> ii)Š.
>> 
>> iii)Š.
>> 
>> v)Š.
>> 
>> 
>> Susan Chalmers
>> susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>
>> 
>> CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
>> http://chalmers.associates
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>> 
>





More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list