[IGFmaglist] IANA session preliminary proposal

[Ricardo]

+1 Olga. 
There are two or three WS on the same topic. As Janis and Carolina has expressed some of these WS could be used to introduce the topic and setting the scene for the main session. 
Best,
Ricardo

Sent from my iPad

> On May 19, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Carolina,
> for some reason I did not get the thread of the session discussion. So this is my comment and thanks for the work of the group.
> For a good part of the Internet Governance community, this is a totally unknown issue.
> I suggest make an clear and simple introduction at the beginning so then all the audience can follow.
> Best
> Olga
> 
> 
> 2014-05-19 11:02 GMT-03:00 Carolina Aguerre <carolina at lactld.org>:
>> 
>> Dear Colleagues:
>> Following the intervention today at the meeting on the progress on the main session in the IANA transition, herewith a preliminary proposal which has been brought together by Susan, Constance, Baher and me. 
>> We look forward to your inputs and comments so that we can start planning ahead and drafting the paper.
>> Thanks.
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Carolina
>>  ----
>> 
>> Preliminary proposal on the IANA main session
>> The session will begin with a brief background on the IANA’s technical functions - what they do and do not include - and then detail the process for determining a)the transition of NTIA’s stewardship role and b) ICANN's accountability process. The session will encourage discussion on the various proposals and ideas that have been developed by the broader multistakeholder community. The session will also provide questions that both panelists and audience members can respond to (and also considering the organized input that workshop coordinators of these issues might be able to submit - feeding into the main session from other workshop sessions). 
>> 
>> 
>> Relevant questions may include (please bear in mind that these may have to be revisited closer to the date of the IGF, in light of any changed circumstances between now and then.)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1. What is at stake for the affected parties after this announcement?
>> 
>> 2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of various proposals for new IANA stewardship?
>> 
>> 3. How will the various parties involved in the IANA functions be affected by these proposals?
>> 
>> 4. How is the process evolving in terms of participation, openness and matters relating to accountability,?
>> 
>> 5. What are the underlying principles on which the evolution should be based?
>> 
>> 6. What are the expectations with respect to the timeline and how could the process improve to meet the deadline?
>> 
>> 7. How and what accountability mechanisms are currently being considered? How will they feed into the process?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Session Format
>> We suggest a panel of six speakers and one moderator which will actually play more the role of an interviewer, in to provide more interactivity to the session; panelists will speak for 30 minutes and the remaining time will be for discussion with the floor as well as with remote participants. The role of a a rapporteur will be crucial to capture key discussion points and include them within the session’s report.
>> 
>> -- 
>> <mime-attachment.jpg>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140519/fa2b0772/attachment.htm>