[IGFmaglist] IANA session preliminary proposal

[Susan Chalmers]

Greetings, colleagues,

With hopes this email finds you all well in Paris and elsewhere.

Just a friendly reminder encouraging any further thoughts on this main
session proposal, as we'll soon need to take a look at the composition of
the panel.

Taking into account the contributions of Carolina and Paul Wilson yesterday
(from reading the transcript), as well as the contributions of Olga and
Ricardo above, the background information on IANA should be brief and
concise, perhaps best supplemented by a one-page document to read in
advance. Also, the session questions should be informed by what was
discussed during the relevant workshops. Thus it would be a good idea to
identify a rapporteur to attend these workshops and report back on what was
discussed before the main session questions are finalised.

Very keen to hear further thoughts.

Congratulations to the Chair and MAG on the progress made thus far during
the meeting. I wish everybody the best for tomorrow.

Sincerely,
Susan


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Ricardo <ricardo.pedraza.barrios at gmail.com
> wrote:

> +1 Olga.
> There are two or three WS on the same topic. As Janis and Carolina has
> expressed some of these WS could be used to introduce the topic and setting
> the scene for the main session.
> Best,
> Ricardo
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Carolina,
> for some reason I did not get the thread of the session discussion. So
> this is my comment and thanks for the work of the group.
> For a good part of the Internet Governance community, this is a totally
> unknown issue.
> I suggest make an clear and simple introduction at the beginning so then
> all the audience can follow.
> Best
> Olga
>
>
> 2014-05-19 11:02 GMT-03:00 Carolina Aguerre <carolina at lactld.org>:
>
>>
>> Dear Colleagues:
>> Following the intervention today at the meeting on the progress on the
>> main session in the IANA transition, herewith a preliminary proposal which
>> has been brought together by Susan, Constance, Baher and me.
>> We look forward to your inputs and comments so that we can start planning
>> ahead and drafting the paper.
>> Thanks.
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Carolina
>>  ----
>>
>> *Preliminary proposal on the IANA main session*
>>
>> The session will begin with a brief background on the IANA’s technical
>> functions - what they do and do not include - and then detail the process
>> for determining a)the transition of NTIA’s stewardship role and b) ICANN's
>> accountability process. The session will encourage discussion on the
>> various proposals and ideas that have been developed by the broader
>> multistakeholder community. The session will also provide questions that
>> both panelists and audience members can respond to (and also considering
>> the organized input that workshop coordinators of these issues might be
>> able to submit - feeding into the main session from other workshop
>> sessions).
>>
>>
>> Relevant questions may include (please bear in mind that these may have
>> to be revisited closer to the date of the IGF, in light of any changed
>> circumstances between now and then.)
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. What is at stake for the affected parties after this announcement?
>>
>> 2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of various proposals for new
>> IANA stewardship?
>>
>> 3. How will the various parties involved in the IANA functions be
>> affected by these proposals?
>>
>> 4. How is the process evolving in terms of participation, openness and
>> matters relating to accountability,?
>>
>> 5. What are the underlying principles on which the evolution should be
>> based?
>>
>> 6. What are the expectations with respect to the timeline and how could
>> the process improve to meet the deadline?
>>
>> 7. How and what accountability mechanisms are currently being considered?
>> How will they feed into the process?
>>
>>
>>
>> *Session Format *
>>
>> We suggest a panel of six speakers and one moderator which will actually
>> play more the role of an interviewer, in to provide more interactivity to
>> the session; panelists will speak for 30 minutes and the remaining time
>> will be for discussion with the floor as well as with remote participants.
>> The role of a a rapporteur will be crucial to capture key discussion points
>> and include them within the session’s report.
>> --
>> <mime-attachment.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>


-- 
Susan Chalmers
Consultant, Internet Policy

+1 269 324 4101
www.susanchalmers.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140520/7ad0ec62/attachment.htm>