[IGFmaglist] IANA session preliminary proposal

[Olga Cavalli]

Thanks Carolina,
for some reason I did not get the thread of the session discussion. So this
is my comment and thanks for the work of the group.
For a good part of the Internet Governance community, this is a totally
unknown issue.
I suggest make an clear and simple introduction at the beginning so then
all the audience can follow.
Best
Olga


2014-05-19 11:02 GMT-03:00 Carolina Aguerre <carolina at lactld.org>:

>
> Dear Colleagues:
> Following the intervention today at the meeting on the progress on the
> main session in the IANA transition, herewith a preliminary proposal which
> has been brought together by Susan, Constance, Baher and me.
> We look forward to your inputs and comments so that we can start planning
> ahead and drafting the paper.
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
>
> Carolina
>  ----
>
> *Preliminary proposal on the IANA main session*
>
> The session will begin with a brief background on the IANA’s technical
> functions - what they do and do not include - and then detail the process
> for determining a)the transition of NTIA’s stewardship role and b) ICANN's
> accountability process. The session will encourage discussion on the
> various proposals and ideas that have been developed by the broader
> multistakeholder community. The session will also provide questions that
> both panelists and audience members can respond to (and also considering
> the organized input that workshop coordinators of these issues might be
> able to submit - feeding into the main session from other workshop
> sessions).
>
>
> Relevant questions may include (please bear in mind that these may have to
> be revisited closer to the date of the IGF, in light of any changed
> circumstances between now and then.)
>
>
>
> 1. What is at stake for the affected parties after this announcement?
>
> 2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of various proposals for new IANA
> stewardship?
>
> 3. How will the various parties involved in the IANA functions be affected
> by these proposals?
>
> 4. How is the process evolving in terms of participation, openness and
> matters relating to accountability,?
>
> 5. What are the underlying principles on which the evolution should be
> based?
>
> 6. What are the expectations with respect to the timeline and how could
> the process improve to meet the deadline?
>
> 7. How and what accountability mechanisms are currently being considered?
> How will they feed into the process?
>
>
>
> *Session Format *
>
> We suggest a panel of six speakers and one moderator which will actually
> play more the role of an interviewer, in to provide more interactivity to
> the session; panelists will speak for 30 minutes and the remaining time
> will be for discussion with the floor as well as with remote participants.
> The role of a a rapporteur will be crucial to capture key discussion points
> and include them within the session’s report.
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140519/e6199628/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12816 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140519/e6199628/attachment.jpe>