[IGFmaglist] MAG Lists - Next steps on workshop streamlining

[Olga Cavalli]

Dear Fiona,
I am ok with your email and next steps.
Please add me to the list of volunteers.
Best
Olga

2013/7/10 Fiona Alexander <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>

> While the technical issues are getting worked out, I'm just reposing the
> message of Tuesday to the workshop streamlining list to the whole group
>
> Subject: Next steps on workshop streamlining
>
> Apologies for the delay, but I've been trying to reach Subi who is
> co-chair before kicking off the work, but have been unsuccessful.  In the
> spirit of moving the work forward I send out the follow for input,
> direction and comments and we can adjust as needed.
>
> As a reminder, this group was set up to facilitate enhancements to the
> workshop proposal process for IGF's post Bali, including seeking public
> input on criteria and a workshop submission template. The specific steps
> proposed and accepted by he MAG are at the bottom of the email for easy
> reference.  I would propose that the first step is for the group to
> identifying the evaluation criteria to be used.  Once there is tentative
> agreement on those, the group could then turn to looking at how to adjust
> the existing workshop template to reflect the evaluation criteria.  The
> criteria used most recently on a 0-2 three point scale was:
>
> - Perspectives : that workshop proponent made an effort to include
> diversity of perspectives on the topic
> - Diversity: that there is a geographic, gender, stakeholder or other
> diversity reflected
> - Relevance:  is this a relevant topic for the IGF annual meeting (also
> consider quality of the proposal i.e is the proposal well thought out and
> complete)
>
> Thoughts/comments on these three.
>
> Are they sufficient?
>
> If so, why?
>
> If not, what's missing?
>
> There has been reference to other criteria developed previously by a
> working group led by Mervi.  As a new MAG member I don't have those.  Could
> some share and we can add these to the discussion thread.
>
> Can participants provide comments by Friday July 19th and I can attempt to
> synthesize the input and send out a revised set of criteria July 24th for
> further discussion.
>
> Fiona
>
>
> Work plan
>
> Step 1:  Creation of a group of MAG members interested (June)
> Step 2:  Development of draft workshop evaluation criteria and workshop
> submission template (July ? August)
> Step 3:  Review by all MAG members for input (September)
> Step 4:  Publication on the IGF website for public comment and information
> (October 1)
> Step 5:  Discussion of criteria and template at IGF Bali (October 24)
> Step 6:  Finalization of criteria and template and their publication on
> the IGF website (December)
> Step 7:  Call for workshop proposals for IGF 2014 (February 2014)
> ________________________________________
> From: HASSAN Ayesha [ayesha.hassan at iccwbo.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:56 AM
> To: Fiona Alexander
> Cc: 'IGF at unog.ch'
> Subject: RE: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> Dear Fiona,
> I did not receive it.
> IGF secretariat colleagues, could you please check whether I am on the
> list?
> Best
> Ayesha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igfmaglist [mailto:igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of
> Fiona Alexander
> Sent: mardi 9 juillet 2013 15:25
> To: Olga Cavalli; Raul Echeberria
> Cc: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> I just posted something to the workshop streamlining list to kick things
> off.  Please let me know if this message is not received.
>
> Fiona
> ________________________________________
> From: Igfmaglist [igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of Olga
> Cavalli [olgacavalli at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:16 PM
> To: Raul Echeberria
> Cc: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> Hi Raul,
> fully agree.
> But there is no activity in the list and we were not sure if it was
> working.
> Best
> Olga
>
> 2013/7/8 Raul Echeberria <raul at lacnic.net<mailto:raul at lacnic.net>>
>
> El 08/07/2013, a las 12:58, Olga Cavalli escribió:
>
> Hi Raul,
> I have subscribed to all the lists and only recieve info from the regional
> one.
> As for the development session we are working using our own emails.
>
>
> Thank you Olga for your email.
> The right thing in my view is to use the list, since this is the only way
> for other people to look at the archives and follow up the discussions.
>
>
> Raúl
>
>
> Best
> Olga
>
> 2013/7/8 Raul Echeberria <raul at lacnic.net<mailto:raul at lacnic.net>>
>
> Dear Chengetai
>
> i have been checking the lists' archives and I am very surprised to see
> that only in 3 of 9 thematic lists there have been some emails exchanges
> and most of them just kick-off type emails. National-regional initiatives
> seems to be the only exception.
>
> Am I checking the rights archives? there have been emails in all the lists?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Raúl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> Raul
> Twitter @raulecheberria
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20130711/88a14ac9/attachment.htm>