[IGFmaglist] MAG Lists - Next steps on workshop streamlining

[Subi Chaturvedi]

Hi Fiona,
Thanks for the post and kick starting this.
Didn't receive any communication before so wasn't in a position to comment.
But glad this is rolling. Looks like a great plan.
Will revert by tomorrow with my inputs. Thanks for putting in the spade on
this one.

Warmest

Subi.

On 11 Jul 2013 01:20, "Fiona Alexander" <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:
>
> While the technical issues are getting worked out, I'm just reposing the
message of Tuesday to the workshop streamlining list to the whole group
>
> Subject: Next steps on workshop streamlining
>
> Apologies for the delay, but I've been trying to reach Subi who is
co-chair before kicking off the work, but have been unsuccessful.  In the
spirit of moving the work forward I send out the follow for input,
direction and comments and we can adjust as needed.
>
> As a reminder, this group was set up to facilitate enhancements to the
workshop proposal process for IGF's post Bali, including seeking public
input on criteria and a workshop submission template. The specific steps
proposed and accepted by he MAG are at the bottom of the email for easy
reference.  I would propose that the first step is for the group to
identifying the evaluation criteria to be used.  Once there is tentative
agreement on those, the group could then turn to looking at how to adjust
the existing workshop template to reflect the evaluation criteria.  The
criteria used most recently on a 0-2 three point scale was:
>
> - Perspectives : that workshop proponent made an effort to include
diversity of perspectives on the topic
> - Diversity: that there is a geographic, gender, stakeholder or other
diversity reflected
> - Relevance:  is this a relevant topic for the IGF annual meeting (also
consider quality of the proposal i.e is the proposal well thought out and
complete)
>
> Thoughts/comments on these three.
>
> Are they sufficient?
>
> If so, why?
>
> If not, what's missing?
>
> There has been reference to other criteria developed previously by a
working group led by Mervi.  As a new MAG member I don't have those.  Could
some share and we can add these to the discussion thread.
>
> Can participants provide comments by Friday July 19th and I can attempt
to synthesize the input and send out a revised set of criteria July 24th
for further discussion.
>
> Fiona
>
>
> Work plan
>
> Step 1:  Creation of a group of MAG members interested (June)
> Step 2:  Development of draft workshop evaluation criteria and workshop
submission template (July ? August)
> Step 3:  Review by all MAG members for input (September)
> Step 4:  Publication on the IGF website for public comment and
information (October 1)
> Step 5:  Discussion of criteria and template at IGF Bali (October 24)
> Step 6:  Finalization of criteria and template and their publication on
the IGF website (December)
> Step 7:  Call for workshop proposals for IGF 2014 (February 2014)
> ________________________________________
> From: HASSAN Ayesha [ayesha.hassan at iccwbo.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:56 AM
> To: Fiona Alexander
> Cc: 'IGF at unog.ch'
> Subject: RE: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> Dear Fiona,
> I did not receive it.
> IGF secretariat colleagues, could you please check whether I am on the
list?
> Best
> Ayesha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igfmaglist [mailto:igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of
Fiona Alexander
> Sent: mardi 9 juillet 2013 15:25
> To: Olga Cavalli; Raul Echeberria
> Cc: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> I just posted something to the workshop streamlining list to kick things
off.  Please let me know if this message is not received.
>
> Fiona
> ________________________________________
> From: Igfmaglist [igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of Olga
Cavalli [olgacavalli at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 12:16 PM
> To: Raul Echeberria
> Cc: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] MAG Lists
>
> Hi Raul,
> fully agree.
> But there is no activity in the list and we were not sure if it was
working.
> Best
> Olga
>
> 2013/7/8 Raul Echeberria <raul at lacnic.net<mailto:raul at lacnic.net>>
>
> El 08/07/2013, a las 12:58, Olga Cavalli escribió:
>
> Hi Raul,
> I have subscribed to all the lists and only recieve info from the
regional one.
> As for the development session we are working using our own emails.
>
>
> Thank you Olga for your email.
> The right thing in my view is to use the list, since this is the only way
for other people to look at the archives and follow up the discussions.
>
>
> Raúl
>
>
> Best
> Olga
>
> 2013/7/8 Raul Echeberria <raul at lacnic.net<mailto:raul at lacnic.net>>
>
> Dear Chengetai
>
> i have been checking the lists' archives and I am very surprised to see
that only in 3 of 9 thematic lists there have been some emails exchanges
and most of them just kick-off type emails. National-regional initiatives
seems to be the only exception.
>
> Am I checking the rights archives? there have been emails in all the
lists?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Raúl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> Raul
> Twitter @raulecheberria
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20130711/b10e7bab/attachment.htm>