[Outreach_com_2015] Thoughts on the September MAG meeting and WSIS outreach

Mon Apr 20 14:02:18 EDT 2015

Dominique - would it be worth you reaching out to our Brazilian colleagues
directly (not sure if they're following the thread)?

And just a quick apology to Juan Fernandez for calling him Juan
Carlos...Sorry about that!

Best,
Lea

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dominique Lazanski <dlazanski at gsma.com>
wrote:

>  Thanks Lea for bringing this proposal to the group again.
>
>
>
> *From:* Outreach_com_2015 [mailto:
> outreach_com_2015-bounces at intgovforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Romero
> Caballero, Maria Victoria
> *Sent:* 20 April 2015 17:14
> *To:* Lea Kaspar; Janis Karklins
> *Cc:* outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Outreach_com_2015] Thoughts on the September MAG meeting
> and WSIS outreach
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> Thanks Lea for bringing this proposal to the group. I agree that we need
> to closely work with our Brazilian colleagues and hear their views in order
> to efficiently proceed.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Victoria Romero
>
>
>
> *From:* Outreach_com_2015 [
> mailto:outreach_com_2015-bounces at intgovforum.org
> <outreach_com_2015-bounces at intgovforum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lea Kaspar
> *Sent:* lunes, 20 de abril de 2015 04:35 p.m.
> *To:* Janis Karklins
> *Cc:* outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Outreach_com_2015] Thoughts on the September MAG meeting
> and WSIS outreach
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> According to my notes, the Brazilian colleagues are also organising a
> meeting/reception open to the broader community on May 25th, during the
> WSIS Forum. To increase synergies, avoid duplication, and support the
> efforts by our Brazilian friends, it would be useful to better understand
> their strategy and whether/where they need support - in May and beyond.
>
>
>
> According to the TOR for this group, we have already settled that IGF
> renewal is one of our objectives. As Juan Carlos, Marilyn, and others have
> noted, influencing the positions of NY/Geneva missions will be a core part
> of achieving this objective. The question that follows is how best to do
> this in our capacity as the MAG. Should we just offer whatever support the
> Brazilians find most useful, or should we be doing anything in addition to
> their efforts? If the answer is yes, then we should have a strategy (with a
> clear set of objectives, audience mapping, relevant activities, and
> timelines + MAG volunteers to lead on each activity) on which to base our
> decisions on organising particular meetings/ activities. For reference, I'm
> pasting below an email that I sent around on March 24 with activities that
> could be considered as part of this effort.
>
>
>
> In any case, I think a better understanding of what the strategy is on the
> side of our Brazilian colleagues would be beneficial for this discussion.
>
>
>
> Warm wishes,
>
> Lea
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> To move forward with the discussion on the actions necessary to
> ensure IGF mandate renewal, I would like to share a few ideas with the
> group. This was drafted on the basis of a number of activities contributing
> to this objective already taking place (e.g. general messaging), but
> without a concrete action plan to achieve the outcome we want.  These are
> preliminary thoughts put together with the aim to get a more substantive
> conversation going and any feedback is very welcome.
>
>
>
> While I'm sure there's more that could be done (and other similar
> initiatives by other groups should be supported), here are a few activities
> that the MAG could decide to take up:
>
>
> *1. General messaging at major events by MAG Chair and members*
>
> This is already taking place and should continue until the December
> WSIS+10 High Level Event. MAG should make sure that all messages contribute
> to IGF mandate renewal by highlighting information relevant for specific
> audiences.
>
>
>
> *2. Targeted messaging of primary audiences relevant for IGF renewal *
>
> This activity could focus on targeted engagement with key decision-makers
> on behalf of the MAG. It could be a combination of bilateral and
> multilateral meetings organised by the MAG Chair, supported by the host
> country (Brazil) and MAG members. It could also include targeted
> communiques. If appropriate, the MAG could encourage the host country to
> include targeted messages in their official invites to high level
> government representatives. Targeted messaging could be done via A) NY
> missions; B) Geneva missions; C) Outreach in capitals.
>
>
>
> *3. Targeted event in NY in September*
>
> The MAG could consider facilitating a multistakeholder event on the
> margins of its September meeting in New York. The event itself could be a
> mix of information-sharing and strategic outreach. Ideally, a
> few MAG 'champions' from different stakeholder groups would take the lead
> in organising this event. Governments that could lead the effort could be
> Brazil (as this year's hosts) and Mexico (as potential next host). It might
> be an idea to invite all past IGFhosts to participate in or co-sponsor the
> event. This could be done in addition to or in collaboration with other
> similar initiatives.
>
>
>
> *4. Public campaign*
>
> The MAG could consider running a public campaign for IGF mandate renewal.
> Depending on resources, there are different ways this could be done.
> The MAG could consider drafting a simple statement endorsing IGF mandate
> renewal and ask stakeholders to sign on. To make this an effective advocacy
> tool, It would be particularly valuable to get sign on from governments,
> starting with those on the MAG. If an event in NY is organised in
> September, this could be an opportunity to launch the campaign, or seek
> broader sign-on, as appropriate.
>
>
>
> *5. Embedding the renewal message in national, regional, and
> global IGF programs*
>
> The MAG should consider how the program of the upcoming IGF in Joao
> Pessoa, as well as various national and regional IGFs could contribute to
> ensuring mandate renewal. This could be done by organising a main session
> that addresses the issue of mandate renewal, and/or by encouraging workshop
> proposals that aim to contribute to this objective.
>
>
>
> As noted above, this list is not meant to discourage other ideas, but
> rather as a starting point for discussion.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> *Lea Kaspar*
>
> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>
> Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT
>
> T: +44 (0)20 7549 033*7* | M: +44 (0)7583 929216 | Skype: l.kaspar
>
> gp-digital.org
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Don't think it has changed, Virat.
>
> JK
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Virat Bhatia <virat.bhatia at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Most of MAG should be in by 19th evening( mtg starts 20th morning) if not
> all. But we were told on a previous MAG V C that the 19 th reception /
> outreach by Brazil is strictly G2G. Has that changed ?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
> On 20-Apr-2015, at 6:35 PM, Ana Neves <Ana.Neves at fct.pt> wrote:
>
>  A pity it can’t be done on the 20th May as MAG members could be invited
> (or through their Missions) to participate and influence somehow, helping
> in explaining IGF and what is going on worldwide on this area. On the 19th
> I imagine that not all MAG members will be in Geneva timely (if I
> understand the objective correctly).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Ana
>
>
>
> *From:* Outreach_com_2015 [
> mailto:outreach_com_2015-bounces at intgovforum.org
> <outreach_com_2015-bounces at intgovforum.org>] *On Behalf Of *Janis Karklins
> *Sent:* segunda-feira, 20 de Abril de 2015 13:57
> *To:* Marilyn Cade
> *Cc:* outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Outreach_com_2015] Thoughts on the September MAG meeting
> and WSIS outreach
>
>
>
> Marilyn,
>
>
>
> During the last MAG call the Brazilian delegation informed that it will
> reach out GVA delegations probably 19 May and NY delegations some time in
> June.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> JK
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> WSIS +10 consultations will emerge very rapidly, post June announcement of
> Co Faciliators.  At least two consultations would seem probable.  I 'doubt'
> that we will know until June, so perhaps we focus on the principle -- and
> ask how we could as MAG propose to participate.  Given the time span,
> perhaps we can be a little flexible.
>
>
>
> I wonder, though, if we should focus first on finalizing messages. Another
> idea could be engagement with governments as former  hosts, governments as
> present and past MAG members, building on the Brazilian outreach. The MAG
> will be in Geneva in May.
>
> How about a mission invitation to a reception with the MAG at this
> meeting?
>
>
>
> I could ask IGFSA if there might be support.
>
>
>
> Marilyn Cade
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: dlazanski at gsma.com
> To: outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:31:05 +0000
> Subject: [Outreach_com_2015] Thoughts on the September MAG meeting and
> WSIS outreach
>
>
>
> I was wondering what the Outreach committee members thought about the
> September MAG meeting with respect to any WSIS outreach. If the WSIS+10
> meetings will be taking place at other, different times maybe we should
> change course and look at working around those meetings. They are not yet
> announced, but it would be good to start thinking about our WSIS approach.
>
>
>
> I am seeking thoughts/feedback from all of you on WSIS outreach so please
> send it along to the group.
>
>
>
> Dominique
>
>
>
> *Dominique Lazanski* | Public Policy Director | GSM Association | Email:
> dlazanski at gsma.com | Mobile: +44 (0)7809316063
>
>
>
> This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and
> may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no
> action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please
> reply to this email or call +44 207 356 0600 and highlight the error.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Outreach_com_2015 mailing
> list Outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/outreach_com_2015_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outreach_com_2015 mailing list
> Outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/outreach_com_2015_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Outreach_com_2015 mailing list
> Outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/outreach_com_2015_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Outreach_com_2015 mailing list
> Outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/outreach_com_2015_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and
> may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no
> action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please
> reply to this email or call +44 207 356 0600 and highlight the error.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/outreach_com_2015_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150420/d135086c/attachment.htm>