[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

[Khaled Koubaa]

Thank you, Roberto.

I would recommend that we consider making the weights public.

Khaled Koubaa

Twitter : @koubaak <https://twitter.com/koubaak>

LinkedIn : linkedin.com/in/koubaak/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/koubaak/>


On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:24 PM Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Khaled,
>
> We don't publish the weights, it is just for us and for the scoring systen
> we have.
>
> Both of things (publishing weights and keeping them stable) are up to the
> WG to propose and MAG to decide. Personally, I like your suggestion as well
> as Carol's, and we can further discuss this in our next meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roberto
>
>
>
> El mar., 24 de mayo de 2022 04:08, Khaled Koubaa <khaled.koubaa at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Roberto and all,
>>
>> First, thank you, Roberto and WS evaluating WG on this proposal.
>>
>> One question ( I am sorry if it has been already answered ): Are we
>> publishing the scoring weights to the public?
>>
>> One suggestion: Should we keep the "Weight" and the scoring system stable
>> for a few years to ensure continuity and allow the community to better
>> prepare before each year's forum. We could do a review of the system after
>> three years.
>>
>> Khaled
>>
>> Khaled Koubaa
>>
>> Twitter : @koubaak <https://twitter.com/koubaak>
>>
>> LinkedIn : linkedin.com/in/koubaak/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/koubaak/>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 5:58 PM Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Ryszard,
>>>
>>> Diversity criteria is a very important one, and the fact that the weight
>>> is lower is related to a different reason. During the past years, most of
>>> the proposals (if not all), include some way or another, diversity
>>> approach. So, for the scoring process, this criteria will not provide a
>>> particular influence to change the overall score. In other words, there is
>>> a good chance that most proposals will score high (4, 5) regarding this
>>> criteria, but other criteria, such as  Hybrid Organisation Strategy, will
>>> have varied scoring for sure, and that criteria, among others, will provide
>>> the definitive difference between one proposal compared to another.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Roberto Zambrana
>>>
>>> El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 9:44, Ryszard Hordynski (<
>>> ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com>) escribió:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't diversity be weighting a bit higher?
>>>>
>>>> I would lower first 2 criterias since they are referring to pretty much
>>>> the same area
>>>>
>>>> Just a suggestion
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Ryszard Hordynski
>>>> Senior Director, Strategy and Communications
>>>> M: +48-501199931
>>>> E: ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:*Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
>>>> *To:*MAG-public <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>;Luis Bobo <
>>>> luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
>>>> *Date:*2022-05-19 15:41:29
>>>> *Subject:*[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
>>>> scoring process
>>>>
>>>> Dear Paul and dear fellow MAG members,
>>>>
>>>> We've just finished our last WS evaluation WG meeting and we
>>>> reviewed and approved the weight distribution for each criteria, to be
>>>> considered in the scoring platform that we will be using for the individual
>>>> evaluation after June 3rd (deadline for submitting proposals).
>>>>
>>>> Please @Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>, kindly include this weight
>>>> distribution in the scoring platform.
>>>>
>>>> As suggested, with Eleonora's support, we will work on the SCORING
>>>> GUIDELINES that will be published, together with the evaluation form.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Pease Oliver Amuge
>>>> Roberto Zambrana
>>>> WS Evaluation Process WG Co-facilitators
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Criterion
>>>>
>>>> Weight
>>>>
>>>> Proposed Topic – its relevance to Internet Governance and proper
>>>> alignment with one of the 5 themes
>>>>
>>>> 25%
>>>>
>>>> Workshop Content – including its clear focus on one of the 5 selected
>>>> themes
>>>>
>>>> 25%
>>>>
>>>> Policy Question(s) – including whether they relate closely to the
>>>> proposed topic
>>>>
>>>> 15%
>>>>
>>>> Hybrid Organisation Strategy – whether the proposal lays out an
>>>> effective strategy for hybrid and interactive engagement and takes the
>>>> hybrid nature of the meeting into account in all planning aspects
>>>>
>>>> 25%
>>>>
>>>> Diversity – along different vectors of diversity (gender, region,
>>>> stakeholder group, perspective, taking into account marginalized groups)
>>>>
>>>> 10%
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>>> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20220525/b9dc9817/attachment.htm>