[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

[Roberto Zambrana]

Dear Khaled,

We don't publish the weights, it is just for us and for the scoring systen
we have.

Both of things (publishing weights and keeping them stable) are up to the
WG to propose and MAG to decide. Personally, I like your suggestion as well
as Carol's, and we can further discuss this in our next meeting.

Best regards,

Roberto



El mar., 24 de mayo de 2022 04:08, Khaled Koubaa <khaled.koubaa at gmail.com>
escribió:

> Hi Roberto and all,
>
> First, thank you, Roberto and WS evaluating WG on this proposal.
>
> One question ( I am sorry if it has been already answered ): Are we
> publishing the scoring weights to the public?
>
> One suggestion: Should we keep the "Weight" and the scoring system stable
> for a few years to ensure continuity and allow the community to better
> prepare before each year's forum. We could do a review of the system after
> three years.
>
> Khaled
>
> Khaled Koubaa
>
> Twitter : @koubaak <https://twitter.com/koubaak>
>
> LinkedIn : linkedin.com/in/koubaak/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/koubaak/>
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 5:58 PM Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ryszard,
>>
>> Diversity criteria is a very important one, and the fact that the weight
>> is lower is related to a different reason. During the past years, most of
>> the proposals (if not all), include some way or another, diversity
>> approach. So, for the scoring process, this criteria will not provide a
>> particular influence to change the overall score. In other words, there is
>> a good chance that most proposals will score high (4, 5) regarding this
>> criteria, but other criteria, such as  Hybrid Organisation Strategy, will
>> have varied scoring for sure, and that criteria, among others, will provide
>> the definitive difference between one proposal compared to another.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Roberto Zambrana
>>
>> El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 9:44, Ryszard Hordynski (<
>> ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com>) escribió:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Shouldn't diversity be weighting a bit higher?
>>>
>>> I would lower first 2 criterias since they are referring to pretty much
>>> the same area
>>>
>>> Just a suggestion
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Ryszard Hordynski
>>> Senior Director, Strategy and Communications
>>> M: +48-501199931
>>> E: ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:*Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
>>> *To:*MAG-public <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>;Luis Bobo <
>>> luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
>>> *Date:*2022-05-19 15:41:29
>>> *Subject:*[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
>>> scoring process
>>>
>>> Dear Paul and dear fellow MAG members,
>>>
>>> We've just finished our last WS evaluation WG meeting and we
>>> reviewed and approved the weight distribution for each criteria, to be
>>> considered in the scoring platform that we will be using for the individual
>>> evaluation after June 3rd (deadline for submitting proposals).
>>>
>>> Please @Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>, kindly include this weight
>>> distribution in the scoring platform.
>>>
>>> As suggested, with Eleonora's support, we will work on the SCORING
>>> GUIDELINES that will be published, together with the evaluation form.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Pease Oliver Amuge
>>> Roberto Zambrana
>>> WS Evaluation Process WG Co-facilitators
>>>
>>>
>>> Criterion
>>>
>>> Weight
>>>
>>> Proposed Topic – its relevance to Internet Governance and proper
>>> alignment with one of the 5 themes
>>>
>>> 25%
>>>
>>> Workshop Content – including its clear focus on one of the 5 selected
>>> themes
>>>
>>> 25%
>>>
>>> Policy Question(s) – including whether they relate closely to the
>>> proposed topic
>>>
>>> 15%
>>>
>>> Hybrid Organisation Strategy – whether the proposal lays out an
>>> effective strategy for hybrid and interactive engagement and takes the
>>> hybrid nature of the meeting into account in all planning aspects
>>>
>>> 25%
>>>
>>> Diversity – along different vectors of diversity (gender, region,
>>> stakeholder group, perspective, taking into account marginalized groups)
>>>
>>> 10%
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20220524/9c928dde/attachment.htm>