[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

[Roberto Zambrana]

Dear Ryszard,

Diversity criteria is a very important one, and the fact that the weight is
lower is related to a different reason. During the past years, most of the
proposals (if not all), include some way or another, diversity approach.
So, for the scoring process, this criteria will not provide a particular
influence to change the overall score. In other words, there is a good
chance that most proposals will score high (4, 5) regarding this criteria,
but other criteria, such as  Hybrid Organisation Strategy, will have varied
scoring for sure, and that criteria, among others, will provide the
definitive difference between one proposal compared to another.

Best regards,

Roberto Zambrana






El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 9:44, Ryszard Hordynski (<
ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com>) escribió:

> Hi
>
> Shouldn't diversity be weighting a bit higher?
>
> I would lower first 2 criterias since they are referring to pretty much
> the same area
>
> Just a suggestion
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Ryszard Hordynski
> Senior Director, Strategy and Communications
> M: +48-501199931
> E: ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com
>
>
> *From:*Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
> *To:*MAG-public <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>;Luis Bobo <
> luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
> *Date:*2022-05-19 15:41:29
> *Subject:*[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
> scoring process
>
> Dear Paul and dear fellow MAG members,
>
> We've just finished our last WS evaluation WG meeting and we reviewed and
> approved the weight distribution for each criteria, to be considered in the
> scoring platform that we will be using for the individual evaluation
> after June 3rd (deadline for submitting proposals).
>
> Please @Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>, kindly include this weight
> distribution in the scoring platform.
>
> As suggested, with Eleonora's support, we will work on the SCORING
> GUIDELINES that will be published, together with the evaluation form.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pease Oliver Amuge
> Roberto Zambrana
> WS Evaluation Process WG Co-facilitators
>
>
> Criterion
>
> Weight
>
> Proposed Topic – its relevance to Internet Governance and proper
> alignment with one of the 5 themes
>
> 25%
>
> Workshop Content – including its clear focus on one of the 5 selected
> themes
>
> 25%
>
> Policy Question(s) – including whether they relate closely to the
> proposed topic
>
> 15%
>
> Hybrid Organisation Strategy – whether the proposal lays out an effective
> strategy for hybrid and interactive engagement and takes the hybrid nature
> of the meeting into account in all planning aspects
>
> 25%
>
> Diversity – along different vectors of diversity (gender, region,
> stakeholder group, perspective, taking into account marginalized groups)
>
> 10%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20220519/d0fd4c00/attachment.htm>