[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

[Ryszard Hordynski]

Hi

Shouldn't diversity be weighting a bit higher?

I would lower first 2 criterias since they are referring to pretty much the same area

Just a suggestion

Regards




________________________________

Ryszard Hordynski
Senior Director, Strategy and Communications
M: +48-501199931
E: ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com


From:Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
To:MAG-public <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>;Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
Date:2022-05-19 15:41:29
Subject:[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

Dear Paul and dear fellow MAG members,

We've just finished our last WS evaluation WG meeting and we reviewed and approved the weight distribution for each criteria, to be considered in the scoring platform that we will be using for the individual evaluation after June 3rd (deadline for submitting proposals).

Please @Luis Bobo<mailto:luis.bobogarcia at un.org>, kindly include this weight distribution in the scoring platform.

As suggested, with Eleonora's support, we will work on the SCORING GUIDELINES that will be published, together with the evaluation form.

Best regards,

Pease Oliver Amuge
Roberto Zambrana
WS Evaluation Process WG Co-facilitators



Criterion


Weight


Proposed Topic – its relevance to Internet Governance and proper alignment with one of the 5 themes


25%


Workshop Content – including its clear focus on one of the 5 selected themes


25%


Policy Question(s) – including whether they relate closely to the proposed topic


15%


Hybrid Organisation Strategy – whether the proposal lays out an effective strategy for hybrid and interactive engagement and takes the hybrid nature of the meeting into account in all planning aspects


25%


Diversity – along different vectors of diversity (gender, region, stakeholder group, perspective, taking into account marginalized groups)


10%








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20220519/dd5b7ac3/attachment.htm>