[Bp_spam] Bp_spam Digest, Vol 12, Issue 2

[Wout de Natris]

Thank you, Peter.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
De Natris Consult
Raaphorst 33                                                        Tel: +31 648388813            
2352 KJ Leiderdorp                                              Skype: wout.de.natris


denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl

http://www.denatrisconsult.nl

Blog http://woutdenatris.wordpress.com


> From: bp_spam-request at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Bp_spam Digest, Vol 12, Issue 2
> To: bp_spam at intgovforum.org
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:48:13 -0400
> 
> Send Bp_spam mailing list submissions to
> 	bp_spam at intgovforum.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_spam_intgovforum.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	bp_spam-request at intgovforum.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	bp_spam-owner at intgovforum.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bp_spam digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. IGF Best Practices Forum - Case Study - NZ Legislation
>       (Peter Merrigan)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:47:59 +0000
> From: Peter Merrigan <Peter.Merrigan at dia.govt.nz>
> To: "'bp_spam at intgovforum.org'" <bp_spam at intgovforum.org>
> Cc: 'Julia Cornwell McKean' <Julia.CornwellMcKean at esafety.gov.au>,
> 	"'Wout de	Natris'" <denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl>
> Subject: [Bp_spam] IGF Best Practices Forum - Case Study - NZ
> 	Legislation
> Message-ID:
> 	<851DB14C73FD8C44933A9015F3399C1C014AC8B557 at WLGPRDMBX02.dia.govt.nz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hello
> 
> I hope this email finds you all well.
> 
> I have put together a small case study for the "best practices forum on the regulation and mitigation of unsolicited communications".
> 
> The case study looks at the considerations and the processes that took place when the New Zealand anti-spam legislation (the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007) was being discussed and drafted before coming into force in 2007. It is a small case study and only reflects very briefly on a number of items - I have tried to condense it as much as possible for what could be quite a detailed topic.
> 
> The original framework for the IGF best practices document looked to seek information on the "costs to Government". This is quite a broad topic and rather than attempting to provide a breakdown of financial figures associated to implementing or regulating anti-spam legislation, I considered it more beneficial to note various considerations and processes a Government undertook when creating anti-spam legislation.
> 
> Hopefully this fits within the scope of the best practices document and what we are trying to achieve.
> 
> Thank you for the opportunity to add to this document.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> Peter Merrigan | Senior Investigator | Electronic Messaging Compliance Unit | Regulatory Services
> Department of Internal Affairs - Te Tari Taiwhenua
> Direct Dial: +64 (0) 4 494 0504  | Extn: 5504  | www.dia.govt.nz<http://www.dia.govt.nz/>
> 
> [http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/DIAlogo/$file/DIAlogo.png]
> Further information on the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007 can be found on our website, www.antispam.govt.nz<http://www.antispam.govt.nz/>
> 
> WARNING:  This e mail and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments.  Any disclosure, copying, storage, distribution, reproduction, or other use is prohibited.  Views expressed in this e mail and attachments are those of the individual sender and not necessarily the Department of Internal Affairs.
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150805/f9f65bf4/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 4047 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150805/f9f65bf4/attachment.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: Case Study for IGF - 3 August 2015.docx
> Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
> Size: 59566 bytes
> Desc: Case Study for IGF - 3 August 2015.docx
> URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150805/f9f65bf4/attachment.docx>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_spam mailing list
> Bp_spam at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_spam_intgovforum.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Bp_spam Digest, Vol 12, Issue 2
> **************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150806/6c3e0993/attachment.htm>