[IGFmaglist] [Intersessional_2015] ARCEP includes the Zero Rating Map in its State of the Internet report

[Lynn St.Amour]

Dear Lucas,

thank you, this is very good news indeed.  

While we all have a lot of largely anecdotal data on the contributions IGF has made, concrete examples are the very best way to show the value of the IGF.

Much appreciate your forwarding this, and it would be greatly appreciated if others could send examples as well.

Best regards,

Lynn

Lynn St.Amour
Chair, United Nations Internet Governance Forum (IGF)Multistakeholder Advisory Group
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/


> On Jun 27, 2018, at 10:18 AM, LB at lucabelli.net wrote:
> 
> Good morning,
>  
> In light of the email exchange regarding IGF DC outcomes we had some weeks ago, I though it would have been interesting to share a concrete example of the benefits that a certain degree of flexibility in DC outcomes' development may produce in terms of impact and, ultimately, usefulness of such outcomes. (of course, assuming that impact and usefulness of IGF outcomes is a goal we all share here)
>  
> With my best regards
> Luca
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Subject: [nncoalition] ARCEP includes the Zero Rating Map in its State of the Internetreport
> From: LB at lucabelli.net
> Date: 6/26/18 4:25 pm
> To: "DC NN" <nncoalition at mailman.edri.org>, global-nn at lists.riseup.net, "governance" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
> Cc: "Luca Belli" <luca.belli at fgv.br>
> 
> Dear all, (apologies for cross-posting)
>  
> As you might know, ARCEP (the French Telecoms Regulator) has just released its "State of the Internet" report.
>  
> I am particularly pleased to let you know that the "Net Neutrality" part of the report features a section dedicated to the Zero Rating Map, whose beta version was launched at the IGF 2017 and that now includes information on Zero Rating and  Net Neutrality regulations in 90 countries. See http://zerorating.info/
>  
> It is, to my knowledge, the first time a national regulator includes a section on an IGF outcome in an official report. Besides being concrete evidence that the IGF is not a mere talking shop, this episode demonstrates not only that the IGF can produce concrete outcomes but also that those outcomes can be of concrete use for researchers, regulators and other stakeholders alike. Furthermore, I think it is a very positive sign that the Telecoms regulator of the IGF host country shows such interest for IGF outcomes. 
>  
> The French version of the report is here https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gspublication/rapport-etat-internet-2018_conf050618.pdf
> The English version is here https://www.arcep.fr/uploads/tx_gspublication/report-state-internet-2018_conf050618-ENG.pdf
>  
> The section dedicated to Zero Rating and the Minitelisation of the Internet (that I had the honour to author) is at page 69.
> Further readings on the subject (all in open access) are indicated in the footnotes.
>  
> FYI, all IGF outcomes elaborated by the DCNN over the past years are also freely available here https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/dynamic-coalition-on-network-neutrality-dcnn?qt-dynamic_coalition_on_network_neu=4#qt-dynamic_coalition_on_network_neu
>  
> All the best
> Luca
>  
>  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Luca Belli, PhD
> Senior Researcher, Center for Technology & Society, FGV Rio de Janeiro
> Chercheur Associé, Centre de Droit Public Comparé, Université Paris 2
> Head of Internet Governance at FGV
> internet-governance.fgv.br
> @1lucabelli 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This message, as well as any attached document, may contain information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________ NNcoalition mailing list NNcoalition at mailman.edri.org https://mailman.edri.org/mailman/listinfo/nncoalition
> _______________________________________________
> Intersessional_2015 mailing list
> Intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/intersessional_2015_intgovforum.org