[IGFmaglist] Item to follow up on from today's call

[Izumi AIZU]

I also agree to take this approach further at the next IGF in Istanbul.

As for which topics we will choose, my suggestion is to ask the wider IGF
Community.

I mean, could we start some kind online questionnaire? - before the next
meeting in Paris, not after.

Put a number of candidates, (and "others", prepare a form, ask anyone to
"vote".

A simple one to be used for our reference.

Let's use the technology to reach better decision,

izumi







2014-05-09 23:17 GMT+09:00 CARVELL, Mark <Mark.Carvell at culture.gsi.gov.uk>:

> Fiona and colleagues
>
>
>
> I was very interested to hear Janis’s proposal and agree there needs to be
> a full discussion. It is worth recalling the relevant part of the
> NETmundial outcome document:
>
>
>
> “IV. Points to be further discussed beyond NETmundial:
>
>
>
> Several contributions to NETmundial identified the following
> non-exhaustive list of
>
> points that need better understanding and further discussion in
> appropriate fora:
>
> -          Different *roles and responsibilities of stakeholders* in
> Internet governance,
>
> including the meaning and application of *equal footing*.
>
> -          *Jurisdiction issues* and how they relate to Internet
> governance.
>
> -          *Benchmarking* systems and related indicators regarding the
> application of
>
> Internet governance principles.
>
> -          *Net neutrality*: there were very productive and important
> discussions about
>
> the issue of net neutrality at NETmundial, with diverging views as to
> whether
>
> or not to include the specific term as a principle in the outcomes. The
>
> principles do include concepts of an Open Internet and individual rights to
>
> freedom of expression and information. It is important that we continue the
>
> discussion of the Open Internet including how to enable freedom of
>
> expression, competition, consumer choice, meaningful transparency and
>
> appropriate network management and recommend that this be addressed at
>
> forums such as the next IGF.”
>
>
>
> The UK Government’s view is that, commencing with the Istanbul event, it
> would be highly appropriate for the IGF to be the lead forum for further
> discussion of these four identified topics. It may also be the case that
> inter-sessional work should follow, perhaps with some linkage to the
> regional and national IGFs network. We look forward therefore to full
> consideration of this proposal during the upcoming Paris consultation.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> Mark Carvell
>
> Global Internet Governance Policy
>
> Department for Culture, Media and Sport
>
> United Kingdom Government
>
> +44 20 7211 6062
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Igfmaglist [mailto:igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Fiona Alexander
> *Sent:* 07 May 2014 21:13
>
> *To:* Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> *Subject:* [IGFmaglist] Item to follow up on from today's call
>
>
>
> On the call today, Janis raised the idea of having the IGF actively take
> up an item or two identified in the NetMundial Roadmap and trying to
> further the dialogue.  Upon reflection, I think this idea deserves a more
> fulsome discussion than the brief 5-10 minutes of today’s call.  Janis
> could you perhaps elaborate in a bit more detail exactly what you have in
> mind, how it might work, timing of steps, etc and then MAG members can come
> to Paris prepared to discuss.
>
>
>
> There are expectations of the IGF post NetMundial and the discussions in
> other venues like CSTD and I think we should actively keep those in mind.
>
>
>
> Fiona
>
>
> This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
> service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
> Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
> organisations IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This email and its contents are the property of the Department for
> Culture, Media and Sport.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it.
> All DCMS e-mail is recorded and stored for a minimum of 6 months
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
> with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi
> this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>


-- 
                     >> Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
Japan
www.anr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140510/c2ae9ee8/attachment.htm>