[IGFmaglist] Prep for HR focus session

Raul Echeberria raul at lacnic.net
Tue Aug 13 17:59:22 EDT 2013


Dear Anriette. 

I subscribed to the list but it seems that my subscription is waiting for somebody's approval. 

Thank you very much for taking the lead on this point. 

I have a doubt (what means is not a strong opinion) regarding the time you propose to allocate to the workshops. 
There is no guarantee the reports from the workshops will represent the diversity of views on a given matter. 

The workshops went through a selection process conducted by us with a heterogeneous criteria and while we did our best in a good faith, if different workshops would have been selected, different reports made by different people could have gained space in the main session. 

I like the idea of asking the workshops proposers about the questions they plan to address, but giving almost half of the time to the workshops proposers (40 of 90 minutes) seems to reduce very much the time available for free and audience-driven discussion.  

Just some thoughts, 


Raúl 


El 13/08/2013, a las 10:04, Anriette Esterhuysen escribió:

> Dear all
> 
> I am the MAG member that has volunteered to facilitate preparation for the focus session (previously called a main session) on "Human rights, fx, and the free flow of information on the internet". Other MAG members who offered to be active in this process are Paul Wilson, Patrick Ryan and Ayesha Hassan. I am really happy to report that the Secretariat has responded to my request to avoid overlap between this session and HR-related workshops. There are still a few privacy workshops in the same time slot, but no HR workshops. 
> 
> I noticed that there have been no posting yet to the list the Secretariat has set up for this Focus Session.
> 
> The sign up page is: http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/ophumrights_intgovforum.org
> The address is: ophumrights at intgovforum.org
> 
> Because no one has signed up yet, I am copying this to the MAG list, but please, if you want to work on this topic, sign up to the ophumanrights at intgovforum.org list so that we can continue our work there.
> 
> The  latest programme paper and schedule are here:
> 
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/Draft%20Programme%20Paper%20Bali%202013.pdf
> http://intgovforum.org/cms/wks2013/Schedule-IGF2013.pdf
> 
> In implementing the recommendations of the CSTD WG on IG improvements the MAG's goal this year is for the IGF to produce some more tangible outcomes, recommendations, or 'take-aways'.
> 
> My proposed format for the HR main session 14h30 to 16h00 on Day 3 is as follows:
> 
> PRE-IGF preparation:
> 1) We ask all the organisers of Security/Openness/Privacy/Human Rights related workshops and Open Forums what the key policy questions/issues are they will address at the IGF. Some workshop organisers have already outlined these in their proposals.
> 
> 2) We also ask the dynamic coalitions and organised constituency groups dealing with related topics what they feel the key policy questions and issues are that the IGF should address this year.
> 
> 3) We invite all SOP/HR related workshop organisers to attend the HR Focus Session to present and discuss the outcome of their events. We can give them a rough outline drawing on the CSTD WG on IGF improvements work: questions/issues addressed; points of consensus; points of convergence; points of further action/research/referral to other institutions or actors. 
> AT THE IGF:
> We have 1.5 hours. Perhaps a bit short..but that is what we have at this point. The Focus Session immediately after is on IG principles.
> 
> 1) Format: Round table rather than stage with panel and 'audience'. Session can start with overview by moderator (5 minutes)
> 2) Inputs: from HR/SOP related workshops and dynamic coalitions (I count about 12 - this is challenging, but if we give them 3 minutes each it will work. (40 minutes)
> 3) Discussion (30 minutes)
> 4) Response from a speaker who has expertise in the theme to link the inputs with the 'state of HR on the internet' more broadly. Frank La Rue would be good, but I am open to other proposals (10 minutes)
> 5) Moderator and rapporteur present summary and way forward using the format: points of consensus; points of convergence; points of further action/research/referral to other institutions or actors. 
> 
> What do you think of this?
> 
> Anriette
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
> executive director, association for progressive communications
> www.apc.org
> po box 29755, melville 2109
> south africa
> tel/fax +27 11 726 1692
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20130813/5ca1702d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Igfmaglist mailing list