[WG-Strategy] Collecting your inputs on the Options Paper main chapters
Flávio Rech Wagner
flavio at inf.ufrgs.br
Fri Aug 14 13:23:03 EDT 2020
Dear colleagues
In its Chapter 5, the Options Paper, on establishing a Policy Incubator,
makes the following proposal:
* /Rather than establish a new structure, further develop the Dynamic
Coalitions and Best Practice Fora which already organize
intersessional work and produce recommendations and best practice
proposals. They should be given a clear mandate, working procedures
and principles and receive more resources and administrative support
by the IGF Secretariat. The work of the Dynamic Coalitions and Best
Practice Fora has to be complemented by other initiatives to link
discussion and decision-making bodies./
In the WG document gathering our comments and suggestions regarding the
Options Paper, I suggested the following text with regards to the above
proposal:
* The WG supports the proposal of the Options Paper: “....” The WG
further suggests that BPFs and DCs should necessarily include
experts from external organizations and, especially, representatives
from decision-making bodies. They would discuss recommendations that
could inform the adoption of norms and policies by decision-making
bodies and organizations from various stakeholder groups. This way,
these structures would also help strengthencooperation and
coordination with other fora of the digital cooperation ecosystem
(Chapter 3 of the Options Paper).
Despite my text above, I am not sure whether DCs are "fit for purpose"
regarding the goals expected from the Policy Incubator concept. Most DCs
are IMO long-living structures (despite their identification as
"dynamic"), usually gathering like-minded stakeholders, and covering a
broad range of issues under rather overarching themes. For implementing
the concept of Policy Incubation, I would expect groups dealing with
narrower issues, gathering stakeholders with very distinct perspectives,
and concluding their work within a limited time frame. Adapting the DCs
to this concept could require a deeper modification of their goals and
Terms of Reference. The Policy Incubation concept seems much closer to
the BPFs, although also requiring some adjustments in their Terms of
Reference. I agree that we do not need a new, permanent "Policy
Incubator" structure. I would prefer dynamic "Policy Incubation
instances" (that could be an evolution of the current BPF model) that
deal with more specific cross-cutting digital issues, which are not
already covered by other existing cooperation fora, and for which
concrete recommendations can be produced within a limited time frame. I
would see each of those "Policy Incubation instances" living for one or
two IGF cycles at most (while some BPFs have been existing longer than
that).
I see this model of short-lived, dynamic "Policy Incubation instances"
closer to supporting the goals that are expressed in the Options Paper,
in its Chapters 3 (Strengthening Cooperation and Coordination), 4 (More
Actionable and Concrete Outcomes) and 5 (Forging Links Between
Discussion and Decision-Making Bodies).
DCs, in my opinion, should be kept as they are, as they seem to serve a
different purpose, namely gathering stakeholders around broader themes
and for a longer time.
Just food for thought.
Best regards
Flávio
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> according to the last virtual meeting I drafted the template to
> collect your inputs on the Options Paper document.
>
> The document is available here:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qQGc_qGmorKhjN4IfIYfYD5bNkq9seSk/view?usp=sharing
>
> I included few statements I think you should agree upon.
>
> Please include your thoughts and comments.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Best,
>
> Titti
>
>
--
Prof. Flávio Rech Wagner
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sulflavio at inf.ufrgs.br
Instituto de Informática Fone: +55-51-3308 9494
Porto Alegre, Brasilhttp://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~flavio
Presidente da Internet Society Brasil
flavio at inf.ufrgs.br,info at isoc.org.br Fone: +55-51-3308 9494
https://www.isoc.org.br Twitter: @ISOCBrasil
https://www.facebook.com/isocbrasil/ https://www.youtube.com/isocbrasil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/wg-strategy_intgovforum.org/attachments/20200814/5d8719d8/attachment.htm>
More information about the WG-Strategy
mailing list