[WG-Strategy] Report of the WG on Improvements

[Roberto Zambrana]

Dear Flávio,

Great documents indeed.

Thank you very much for this contribution.

Best regards,

Roberto Zambrana

El mar., 28 jul. 2020 a las 13:03, Flávio Rech Wagner (<flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>)
escribió:

> Dear colleagues
>
> As one of the action items that have been approved in our last WG meeting,
> please find in the link below a first document containing a selected sample
> of the recommendations for IGF improvements:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lutZTnFaGLhMm-QK3hSb2ZNv4i3f658LTLWguT-OT8Y/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Considering the charter of the WG on Strengthening and Strategy and its
> initial priorities, I have listed only selected recommendations in this
> document, together with the assessment of their implementations. These
> recommendations are related to the three following aspects of the IGF:
> Outcomes; Link to other IG entities; Multi year planning.
>
> The complete spreadsheet (see my previous email to the WG, below) contains
> recommendations that cover many other aspects: Stakeholder engagement;
> Funding; Intersessional work; Capacity building; MAG structure and methods;
> Broader participation; Processes and Secretariat; Communication; Workshops
> selection; and others.
>
> As a second part of this action item, I also produced a partial
> spreadsheet that collects the recommendations coming only from the DESA
> Retreat (July 2016). You may find it here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lBnmgoa2E8jY00E1VI_Tp4VjgzuQX5II/edit#gid=480002698
>
> Please notice that recommendations from the DESA Retreat are also included
> in the complete spreadsheet mentioned above.
>
> Please also notice that the document with the final proceedings from the
> DESA Retreat (link below) is not organized as a series of "formal
> recommendations". It is rather a summary of discussions that took place
> during the Retreat, reflecting positions that were expressed by
> participants. In this sense, there were no recommendations approved by some
> form of consensus-based, decision-making process, as in the case of the
> other documents that were used as sources by the WG on IGF Improvements.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MoaGH8fNBDJa9q7nJ8yo2r1Yuu1_loheH-K030Niocs/edit
> In order to integrate the contributions of the DESA Retreat to the
> exercise performed by the WG on IGF Improvements, I extracted
> "recommendations" from the Retreat proceedings, by selecting appropriate
> parts of the text.
>
> Best regards
>
> Flávio
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues
>
> As one of the main goals of this WG is the strengthening of the IGF given
> its current mandate, I think it is interesting to revisit the work of the
> MAG Working Group on IGF Improvements, which was chartered from 2017 to
> 2019.
>
> That WG collected in a single spreadsheet recommendations on IGF
> improvements coming from various sources:
> 1. The Commission on Science and Technology for Development - CSTD WG on
> IGF Improvements Report (2012)
> 2. Implementing WSIS Outcomes: A Ten-Year Review (2015)
> 3. Recommendations made by United Nations general Assembly - UNGA on
> renewal of the IGF mandate (December 2015)
> 4. Draft report from the United Nations Department of Economic and Social
> Affairs - DESA Retreat (July 2016)
> 5. The NETmundial Multistakeholder Statement (April 2014)
>
> These recommendations were consolidated into around 150 entries in this
> spreadsheet and further classified into 11 different categories. For each
> recommendation in each category, WG members tried to assess its status:
> completed / in progress / has to be implemented.
>
> A report of the WG outcomes by the end of 2018 is attached to this email.
> The assessment of the recommendations was not yet completed. Of course new
> developments in 2019 and 2020 are not considered in that exercise.
>
> Although the WG was still chartered in 2019, it did not produce further
> tangible results.
>
> Links to the spreadsheet and to documents with the assessment of the
> recommendations in each of the categories are included in the attached
> document.
>
> I hope this may be helpful.
>
> Best,
>
> Flávio
>
>
> --
> Prof. Flávio Rech Wagner		
>
> Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul      flavio at inf.ufrgs.br
> Instituto de Informática                       Fone: +55-51-3308 9494
> Porto Alegre, Brasil                           http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~flavio
>
> Presidente da Internet Society Brasilflavio at inf.ufrgs.br, info at isoc.org.br          Fone: +55-51-3308 9494https://www.isoc.org.br                        Twitter: @ISOCBrasilhttps://www.facebook.com/isocbrasil/           https://www.youtube.com/isocbrasil
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-Strategy mailing list
> WG-Strategy at intgovforum.org
> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-strategy_intgovforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/wg-strategy_intgovforum.org/attachments/20200803/491643aa/attachment.htm>