[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the scoring process

[Roberto Zambrana]

Dear Carol,

I think we will have a meeting next week, Thursday June 2nd.

Best regards,

Roberto

El lun., 23 de mayo de 2022 16:28, CAROL ROACH <CAROLROACH at bahamas.gov.bs>
escribió:

> Roberto
>
> When is the next working group meeting?
>
>
> Carol Roach, MSc, PMP
> Deputy Director,
> Department of Transformation and Digitization,
> Government of The Bahamas
>
> Tel. 1 242 397 0050 <12423970050>
> Web.  www.bahamas.gov.bs
> www.bahamas.gov.bs/dtad
> mygateway.gov.bs
>
>
>
> CAROL ROACH via Igfmaglist --- Re: [IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to
> each criteria in the scoring process ---
> From: "CAROL ROACH via Igfmaglist" <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> To: "Roberto Zambrana" <rzambrana at gmail.com>
> Cc: "MAG-public" <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Date: Mon, May 23, 2022 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
> scoring process
> ------------------------------
>
> Dear All
>
> I like the weighting
>
>
> Carol Roach, MSc, PMP
> Deputy Director,
> Department of Transformation and Digitization,
> Government of The Bahamas
>
> Tel. 1 242 397 0050 <12423970050>
> Web.  www.bahamas.gov.bs
> www.bahamas.gov.bs/dtad
> mygateway.gov.bs
>
>
>
> Roberto Zambrana --- Re: [IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each
> criteria in the scoring process ---
> From: "Roberto Zambrana" <rzambrana at gmail.com>
> To: "Ryszard Hordynski" <ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com>
> Cc: "MAG-public" <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Date: Thu, May 19, 2022 9:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
> scoring process
> ------------------------------
>
> Dear Ryszard,
>
> Diversity criteria is a very important one, and the fact that the weight
> is lower is related to a different reason. During the past years, most of
> the proposals (if not all), include some way or another, diversity
> approach. So, for the scoring process, this criteria will not provide a
> particular influence to change the overall score. In other words, there is
> a good chance that most proposals will score high (4, 5) regarding this
> criteria, but other criteria, such as  Hybrid Organisation Strategy, will
> have varied scoring for sure, and that criteria, among others, will provide
> the definitive difference between one proposal compared to another.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roberto Zambrana
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 9:44, Ryszard Hordynski (<
> ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Shouldn't diversity be weighting a bit higher?
>>
>> I would lower first 2 criterias since they are referring to pretty much
>> the same area
>>
>> Just a suggestion
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Ryszard Hordynski
>> Senior Director, Strategy and Communications
>> M: +48-501199931
>> E: ryszard.hordynski at huawei.com
>>
>>
>> *From:*Roberto Zambrana <rzambrana at gmail.com>
>> *To:*MAG-public <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>;Luis Bobo <
>> luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
>> *Date:*2022-05-19 15:41:29
>> *Subject:*[IGFmaglist] FInal weiights assigned to each criteria in the
>> scoring process
>>
>> Dear Paul and dear fellow MAG members,
>>
>> We've just finished our last WS evaluation WG meeting and we reviewed and
>> approved the weight distribution for each criteria, to be considered in the
>> scoring platform that we will be using for the individual evaluation
>> after June 3rd (deadline for submitting proposals).
>>
>> Please @Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>, kindly include this weight
>> distribution in the scoring platform.
>>
>> As suggested, with Eleonora's support, we will work on the SCORING
>> GUIDELINES that will be published, together with the evaluation form.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pease Oliver Amuge
>> Roberto Zambrana
>> WS Evaluation Process WG Co-facilitators
>>
>>
>> Criterion
>>
>> Weight
>>
>> Proposed Topic – its relevance to Internet Governance and proper
>> alignment with one of the 5 themes
>>
>> 25%
>>
>> Workshop Content – including its clear focus on one of the 5 selected
>> themes
>>
>> 25%
>>
>> Policy Question(s) – including whether they relate closely to the
>> proposed topic
>>
>> 15%
>>
>> Hybrid Organisation Strategy – whether the proposal lays out an
>> effective strategy for hybrid and interactive engagement and takes the
>> hybrid nature of the meeting into account in all planning aspects
>>
>> 25%
>>
>> Diversity – along different vectors of diversity (gender, region,
>> stakeholder group, perspective, taking into account marginalized groups)
>>
>> 10%
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> This e-mail message and the information and any attachments contained
> herein are confidential to the addressee and may be subject to professional
> privilege. No other person may place any reliance on this e-mail nor its
> contents, nor copy or distribute it to any other person or use the contents
> in any unauthorised manner without the express permission of the sender. If
> you are not the addressee of this e-mail, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the addressee, please delete it
> and notify the sender as soon as possible. Thank You.
>
>
> This e-mail message and the information and any attachments contained
> herein are confidential to the addressee and may be subject to professional
> privilege. No other person may place any reliance on this e-mail nor its
> contents, nor copy or distribute it to any other person or use the contents
> in any unauthorised manner without the express permission of the sender. If
> you are not the addressee of this e-mail, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the addressee, please delete it
> and notify the sender as soon as possible. Thank You.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20220524/a7f6c9cb/attachment.htm>