[IGFmaglist] Workshop Evaluation System

[Michael ILISHEBO]

Danko,

Great job there.

I have only evaluated so far only 5 Workshop Proposals and hoping to reach
20 by end of week.

I am taking my time to read through and evaluate.

Regards.



*Michael L. Ilishebo,*

*Kitwe, Zambia*

*Social Media Handles*

*Twitter: @ilishebo*

*Skype: michael.ilishebo*




*"walk a mile,for a while,with a smile"*

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Danko Jevtović <danko at jevtovic.rs> wrote:

> I've finished the evaluation. The site works fine, many thanks to the
> Secretariat. I think I was more productive by the offline table approach.
>
> Regards/Pozdrav, Danko Jevtović
>  <mailto:danko at jevtovic.rs> danko at jevtovic.rs  <http://www.jevtovic.rs/>
> http://www.jevtovic.rs/
>  <http://fb.com/dankoj> fb.com/dankoj  <https://www.linkedin.com/in/dankoj>
> linkedin.com/in/dankoj
>  <http://twitter.com/dankoj> twitter.com/dankoj Skype: <callto:dankoj>
> callto:dankoj
> USA:  <tel:+17024879966> (702)487.9966
> mobile:  <tel:+381653496666> +381-(0)65/349-6666
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danko Jevtović <danko at jevtovic.rs>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:27 PM
> To: MAG-public <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] Workshop Evaluation System
>
>
>
> Ben, good template, thanks. To get the list of proposals one can open the
> web page directly from Microsoft Excel. :)
>
>
>
>  <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/workshop-proposals-2018>
> https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/workshop-proposals-2018
>
>
>
> Danko
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Ben Wallis (CELA) < <mailto:bewallis at microsoft.com>
> bewallis at microsoft.com>
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:18 PM
>
> To: Danko Jevtović < <mailto:danko at jevtovic.rs> danko at jevtovic.rs>;
> Nataša Glavor < <mailto:Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr> Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr>;
> MAG-public < <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
> Subject: RE: [IGFmaglist] Workshop Evaluation System
>
>
>
> Like Danko, I'm one of those people who finds it easier to work offline,
> and then paste in the results in the portal once I have evaluated looked at
> them all. In case it's at all helpful for anyone, I'm sharing the document
> I've created to work through my proposals, using the criteria provided on
> the IGF website.
>
>
>
> I think that one benefit of doing it this way is that you can get go back
> and adjust your scores more easily, if necessary, as you get of a feel for
> the proposals and how they compare. For example, what might feel like a 3
> when you are doing your first three or four proposals might feel more like
> a 2 or maybe a 4 once you have done 30 or 40 proposals and have a better
> framework for comparison.
>
>
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Danko Jevtović [ <mailto:danko at jevtovic.rs> mailto:danko at jevtovic.rs
> ]
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:02 AM
>
> To: Nataša Glavor < <mailto:Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr>
> Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr>; MAG-public < <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] Workshop Evaluation System
>
>
>
> It seems it is already done. Thank you Luis.
>
>
>
> I managed to download list of proposals in Excel, so I can evaluate them
> all first, and then past results in the portal.
>
>
>
> Danko
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Nataša Glavor < <mailto:Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr>
> Natasa.Glavor at carnet.hr>
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 9:55 AM
>
> To: MAG-public < <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] Workshop Evaluation System
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I’m not quite sure about the conclusion we made during our yesterdays MAG
> meeting about the additional field Luis Bobo will try to implement into the
> evaluation form and purpose of the additional field would be to mark a
> reviewer suggestion to marge that particular proposal with some other(s)
> proposals. Do we wait for the evaluation form adjustment before starting
> our eveluation process or we put our merging suggestions into Internal
> comments field?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for the clarification.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> —
>
> Natasa Glavor
>
> Analyst
>
> Croatian Academic and Research Network - CARNET Josipa Marohnica 5, 10000
> Zagreb
>
> tel: +385 1 6661 679, fax: +385 6661 615
>
> gsm: +385 91 1472 979
>
>  <http://www.CARNet.hr> www.CARNet.hr
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 14 Jun 2018, at 05:16, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro < <mailto:
> sala at pasifikanexus.nu> sala at pasifikanexus.nu> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Where you have a conflict, list the Workshop No and send them to the
>
> > IGF Secretariat and don't mark them.
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>
> >  <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>
> > To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to
>
> >  <http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org>
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Igfmaglist mailing list
>
>  <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>
> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to  <
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org>
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to http://intgovforum.org/
> mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>