[IGFmaglist] IGF 2017 MAG WS Selection Process - a proposal

[Alejandra Erramuspe]

+1 to Lynn's proposal. 

Best
Ale Erramuspe
Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El 11 jun. 2017, a las 19:10, Lea Kaspar <lea at gp-digital.org> escribió:
> 
> Dear Lynn,
> 
> Thank you for outlining the process to finalise the workshop selection process.
> 
> Two questions to make sure I understand the next steps (apologies if these were raised on last week's call; haven't had a chance to see the summary yet):
> 
> 1. Are there any workshops that will go through automatically (e.g. the top 50)? I seem to remember this being the case last year. I thought that was a good approach that validated the scores given by MAG members who evaluated the proposals in the first round. 
> 
> 2. Could you give a bit more information about step 2 outlined below? You note that all MAG members will now evaluate the top 72 workshops. Does this mean we are meant to score the top 72 workshops again? I'm not sure I understand what exactly we will be evaluating, how the result of this evaluation will be captured, and how the result will influence the final outcome.
> 
> Unfortunately, I won't be able to join you in Geneva this week, but intend to participate remotely. Having clarity about the process will help ensure those of us not in the room can meaningfully contribute.
> 
> Many thanks.
> 
> Warmly,
> Lea
> 
>> On 11 Jun 2017, at 21:23, Kenta Mochizuki <kemochiz at yahoo-corp.jp> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Chair, 
>> 
>> Thank you so much for your proposal while very busy. 
>> 
>> I personally find your proposal acceptable, and hope our WS selection process will go efficiently and smoothly, while taking into account as many opinions and suggestions as possible.
>> 
>> Thank you again and look forward to meeting you tomorrow.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Kenta
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Igfmaglist [mailto:igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour
>> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:35 AM
>> To: IGF Maglist <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>> Subject: [IGFmaglist] IGF 2017 MAG WS Selection Process - a proposal
>> 
>> Dear MAG members,
>> 
>> As discussed during the last MAG calls/MAG list and building on the past 3 - 4 years practices, I would like to propose the following methodology for our WS selection process:
>> 
>> 1 -  MAG precedes on the assumption that the number of Workshop slots to be allocated by the MAG will be 80.
>>   • The first 72 proposals have been highlighted based on the MAG workshop evaluations and following the new process.
>> 
>> 2 - The MAG evaluates those (72) highlighted against the profile of all WS proposals submitted, paying attention to any imbalances or over- representation against our diversity criteria (topic (tags), regional, SH, developed vs. developing, gender, 1st time proposers vs. returning proposers, session types, etc.), and identifies any general reflections or concerns.
>> 
>> 3 - Using the “wildcard” process: each MAG member (if they so choose) can identify one additional WS to be further evaluated by the full MAG due to extenuating circumstances or in response to any perceived imbalances.  As part of this step, MAG members should review the list of WS proposals with the highest standard deviations to see if there are any proposals that should be included in this wildcard process.
>> 
>> 4 - Secretariat can capture Mergers supported by the full MAG.  And, each Merger candidate should have a minimum of 1 (2?)  MAG member(s) to lead the merging discussion as they do not come together easily.
>> 
>> 5 - The entire MAG will participate in this process (no breakout groups), and we will work to find consensus on the chosen Workshops.  Consensus will be judged based on the level of support and the absence of any strong reason based objections.
>> 
>> I hope you find this proposal acceptable.  If something concerns you, please suggest an improvement.
>> 
>> Best regards, and look forward to seeing everyone soon.
>> 
>> Lynn
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org