[IGFmaglist] [E] Re: IGF - MAG WG membership

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 08:08:06 EDT 2016


Hello

Very happy to hear the support for WGs having non-MAG members to bring
in expertise.

I'd like to stress once more the importance of diversity adding to
SGs, gender balance and old/new mag members the idea of regional
balance.

Thanks

Renata



On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Alejandra Erramuspe
<alejandra.erramuspe at agesic.gub.uy> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> +1 for  Lynn, Lea and Avri's points.
>
> best,
>
> Alejandra Erramuspe
> Comunicación Institucional
> AGESIC
> Liniers 1324 Piso 3
> Torre Ejecutiva
> Tel.: 2901 2929 int. 8591
> Montevideo - Uruguay
>
> ________________________________
> De: "Cheryl A Miller" <cheryl.miller at verizon.com>
> Para: "Ljupco Gjorgjinski" <Ljupco.Gjorgjinski at mfa.gov.mk>
> CC: igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Enviados: Jueves, 21 de Abril 2016 9:13:00
> Asunto: Re: [IGFmaglist] [E] Re:  IGF - MAG WG membership
>
> Support Lynn's points, Lea's point on diversity, and Avri/Peter's comments
> on finding a way to review WGs and see if it makes sense that they continue
> or if they should terminate.  I also like the point on keeping charters
> simple if possible.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Ljupco Gjorgjinski
> <Ljupco.Gjorgjinski at mfa.gov.mk> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Sent from a handheld device. Please excuse brevity.
>
> _____________________________
> From: avri doria <avri at acm.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 6:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] IGF - MAG WG membership
> To: <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19-Apr-16 22:13, Peter Dengate Thrush wrote:
>> Unless, like the MAG itself they expire automatically every year, WGs
>> should also have an expiry date in their charter.
>
> I recommend that they not automatically terminate, but that each new MAG
> review them and decide, after consultations with the WG participants and
> the rest of the community, what if any future role they have.
>
> I also suggest that charters be somewhat simple, including a statement
> of purpose and some milestone activities. And that reviews be based on
> a report from each on their status and recommended continuing activities.
>
> But lets keep it simple and give the WG modalities a chance to evolve.
>
> avri
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>




More information about the Igfmaglist mailing list