[IGFmaglist] Popup and Barcamp Sessions Proposals
Renata Aquino Ribeiro
raquino at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 19:57:00 EDT 2016
Hi
I find both pop-up and barcamp sessions great ideas.
As for online participation on them I'd suggest a focus on twitterstorms
and Periscope.
There was also another interesting format in IFF and Rightscon small
meetings. In IFF they were at lunch time in circle and presenter sponsored
sandwiches. They were called lunch mtgs. In RC there was a format called
Boardroom for 20 or so ppl.
Em 13/04/2016 15:35, "Miguel Ignacio Estrada" <miestrada at gmail.com>
escreveu:
> Thanks Jac! Find below my reply:
>
> I like the format ideas. Pop ups would be a bit like on the spot lightning
> talks about particular issues/initiatives. And barcamps like open space
> tech, except those are usually in more constrained contexts where
> everyone participates the same way in this process. How would the selection
> work?
> Considering there are limited spots. And will they only sign up on the
> spot, or can they sign up before hand (in which case, maybe a bit more
> challenging in terms of first come first serve?)
>
> MIE:
> - Pop Up Sessions: we could do a pre selection within the MAG, or maybe we
> could delegate the entire selection to youth programs.
> - Barcamp Sessiones: I would attach to the original Barcamp format, the
> first person in line can choose the slot and so on.
>
> Maybe also identified slot times for remote participation/presentation?
>
> MIE: This could be great!
>
> And also getting the changing schedule into the programme with enough
> time so ppl will be able to choose to go.
>
> MIE: We could easily do it with Pop Up Sessions since they would be
> predefined. For Barcamps sessiones we should save a little time before the
> sessions start in order to make them public.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jac sm Kee <jac at apcwomen.org> wrote:
>
>> I like the format ideas. Pop ups would be a bit like on the spot
>> lightning talks about particular issues/initiatives. And barcamps like
>> open space tech, except those are usually in more constrained contexts
>> where everyone participates the same way in this process. How would the
>> selection work? Considering there are limited spots. And will they only
>> sign up on the spot, or can they sign up before hand (in which case,
>> maybe a bit more challenging in terms of first come first serve?) Maybe
>> also identified slot times for remote participation/presentation? And
>> also getting the changing schedule into the programme with enough time
>> so ppl will be able to choose to go.
>>
>> Either way, they sound like great ideas to explore! Thanks for raising
>> this Miguel.
>>
>> jac
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Jac sm Kee
>> Manager, Women's Rights Programme
>> Association for Progressive Communications
>> www.apc.org | www.takebackthetech.net | erotics.apc.org
>> Jitsi: jacsmk | Skype: jacsmk | Twitter: @jhybe
>>
>> On 07/04/2016 21:32, Alejandra Erramuspe wrote:
>> > Dear Miguel, all,
>> >
>> > I think these are excelent and innovative ideas!
>> >
>> >
>> > The Popup sessions could be implemented by online participation too,
>> > right?. I think we can think about this.
>> >
>> > best,
>> >
>> > Alejandra Erramuspe
>> > Comunicación Institucional
>> > AGESIC
>> > Liniers 1324 Piso 3
>> > Torre Ejecutiva
>> > Tel.: 2901 2929 int. 8591
>> > Montevideo - Uruguay
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > *De: *"Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro" <sala at pasifikanexus.nu>
>> > *Para: *"Miguel Ignacio Estrada" <miestrada at gmail.com>
>> > *CC: *"MAG-public" <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>> > *Enviados: *Miércoles, 6 de Abril 2016 22:07:57
>> > *Asunto: *Re: [IGFmaglist] Popup and Barcamp Sessions Proposals
>> >
>> > Sounds good Miguel.
>> >
>> > On 7 Apr 2016 3:05 am, "Miguel Ignacio Estrada" <miestrada at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:miestrada at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > BTW, since I have experience with both formats, I offer myself to
>> > help in the coordination of them.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Miguel Ignacio Estrada
>> > <miestrada at gmail.com <mailto:miestrada at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > *POPUP SESSIONS*
>> >
>> > I would like to propose a new session format. I am doing it now
>> > because I didn't want to open a new discussion since we were
>> > already overwhelmed.
>> >
>> > During an event I organised while I worked for .AR ccTLD
>> > (http://ir.ar) we had a really good experience with this format
>> > where we invited "unknown" entrepreneurs to present their
>> > projects in 10 minute sessions during and in the same site where
>> > coffee breaks and lunch breaks were being held.
>> >
>> > We just used a screen, a projector and a microphone (keeping the
>> > volume at a not disturbing level), and preselected entrepreneurs
>> > had a chance to present their projects and products in public, a
>> > chance they wouldn't have another way because there was no space
>> > enough in the grid and also if they had, since they were
>> > unknown, there might be no interest to attend to their
>> > presentations.
>> >
>> > I think this may be a good idea for youth programs, and maybe
>> > also an opportunity for some proposals which format may fit
>> > there and won't pass through the MAG selection.
>> >
>> >
>> > *BARCAMP SESSIONS*
>> >
>> > Another idea that came to my mind is to have 1 room or space
>> > left for Barcamp format sessions.
>> >
>> >
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BarCamp#Structure_and_participatory_process
>> >
>> > For anyone who doesn't knows the format, Barcamps
>> > are "unconferences" where attendees schedule sessions by writing
>> > on a whiteboard or putting a Post-It note on a 'grid' of
>> sessions.
>> >
>> > So, at the beginning of each day, a whiteboard with an empty
>> > grid is set in front of the defined room/space, and people
>> > interested in doing a presentation will have the chance to take
>> > a space (30/40 minutes?) on the grid and do their presentation
>> > in that timeframe.
>> >
>> > I believe this format shows innovation, openness and also
>> > transparency in a certain way, and also is more attractive for
>> > young people.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20160413/b1e57026/attachment.htm>
More information about the Igfmaglist
mailing list