[Evolintgov2014] [IGFmaglist] Query: IGF Main Session - Evolution of IG Ecosystem-Update

Subi Chaturvedi subichaturvedi at gmail.com
Sat Aug 9 01:55:17 EDT 2014


Izumi better late than never :) Though the list has been updated. But you
have made some excellent suggestions here.

Have responded inline below.

On 9 August 2014 08:57, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:

> Very sorry for this very late intervention.
>
> Looking at the list of names below, I see very few people from Asia and
> Pacific, especially East Asia, South East Asia and South Asia as well as
> Pacific Islands.
>
> I see no Chinese or Indian, considering the user population, it is better
> to include them.
>
>
> For Government, only Mohammed Al Qurashi (KSA) - from Saudi Arabia which is
> more of Middle East than Asia Pacific.
>
> I would suggest someone from any other Asian countries - say China, Hong
> Kong, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia etc.
>  Dr. Govind (India) - just hosted APrIGF in Delhi - will be very good.:
>

Dr. Govind has been invited. In both his capacities as the organiser of
APrIGF , the CEO of NIXI and following up on Anriette suggestion of
including some host country government reps. India hosted the IGF in 2008
in Hyderabad and Dr. Govind was the nodal officer for it. We have also been
provided a Chair and a speaker for this session from the host country. It
would be good to have two minute interventions from the some of the other
host countries as well. Indonesia, Azerbaijan and others on the value that
IGF has created for and in the host countries, inline with Janis's larger
call.

>
> Amongst Private Sector, Technical Community and Civil Society, I see
> Zahid from Pakistan, Geoff Huston from Australia and Adam Peake (Japan/UK).
>

Bill had suggested Jeremy or Adam Peake from CS. Jeremy has responded in
the affirmative Adam is yet to respond.


> I am not opposing to any single individuals at all, but having them all
> three
> seem too Caucasian oriented, (sorry to bring this), no Oriental or Asian
> or Pacific
> people there.
>
> We have good candidates here again, people like:
>
> Edmon Chung (Hong Kong), Ang Peng Hwa (Singapore), Hong Xue (China),
> Ram Mohan (India), Rajesh Chharia (India), Rajnesh D Singh, (Fiji),
> Hongbin Chu, (China), Anja Kovacs (India) YJ Park (korea).
>

We have some good names from CS now.

I did ask around for the Japanese team which made an excellent presentation
at the WGEC meeting in which they did a comprehensive 8 year evaluation of
IGF. They would make for an excellent intervention in this session. Would
be grateful if you can connect us with them.

We want the panel to be balanced, relevant and diverse.

Also a connect with Prof. Ang Peng Hwa (Singapore) would also be great.

We're trying to not repeat people from the same networks and organisations.

Thanks again for your input. Sending the updated draft shortly. An early
response from you would be much appreciated.

Regards

Subi



>
> Again sorry for this belated response, but I hope some of the factors be
> included.
>
> I didn't put any Japanese as I don't want to make this a kind of selfish
> intervention, but there are also good candidates from Japan ;-)
>
> izumi
>
>    rally leaving off MAG members for now):
>>
>> Government/IGO:
>>
>>    - Neelie Kroes, EC [confirmed (Subi)…for which panel?]
>>    - Rafał Trzaskowski (Poland, confirmed availability to Igor…for panel
>>    1?)
>>    - Robert Shlegel (Russia, MAG, confirms himself)
>>
>>
>>    - Norberto Berner (Argentina)
>>    - Benedicto Fonseca (Brazil)
>>    - Larry Strickling (US)
>>    - Ed Vaizy (UK)
>>    - Mohammed AlQurashi (KSA)
>>    - Alice Munyua (AU)
>>
>> Private Sector:
>>
>>    - Danil Kerimi (WEF)
>>    - Philipp Grabensee (Affilias)
>>    - Zahid Jamil (Jamil & Jamil)
>>    - Phil Rushton (BT)
>>    - Jimson Olufuye (WITSA)
>>
>> Technical Community:
>>
>>    - Jari Arkko (IETF)
>>    - Tim Berners Lee (W3C)
>>    - Virgilio Almeida (Brazil/NM)
>>    - Byron Holland (CIRA)
>>    - Geoff Huston (APNIC)
>>    - Adiel Akplogan (AFRINIC)
>>
>> Civil Society:
>>
>>    - Jeremy Malcolm (EFF)
>>    - Stephanie Perrin (UT)
>>    - Wolfgang Kleinwächter (ICANN)
>>    - Nnenna Nwakanma (WWWF)
>>    - Jovan Kurbalija (Diplo)
>>    - Ron Deibert (Citizen Lab)
>>    - Marilia Maciel (FGV)
>>    - Adam Peake (Glocom)
>>
>>
>
> 2014-08-08 22:42 GMT+09:00 Bhatia, Virat <virat.bhatia at intl.att.com>:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> From everything you have mentioned, we are in complete agreement.
>>
>> Let me explain.
>>
>> *MAG members on main session*
>>
>> (i)      My comments are purely aimed at responding to the questions
>> raised by Subi in her email “regarding serving MAG members as panelists on
>> a main session” to which Jeanette provided a response, and Subi
>> acknowledged, seeking comments to “refresh memory”.  I guess she is trying
>> to decide on whether or not MAG members can accept a speaking / moderator
>> roles on the main session she is helping to organize.
>>
>>
>>
>> (ii)    On the issue of main sessions, Janis, you, I and I believe
>> everyone, agreed to keep the limit to 1 for 2014 IGF, based on his email of
>> July 24, which you have quoted below. There is no quarrel on that issue. In
>> fact your email quoting Janis reinforces my point and gives clear guidance
>> for the organizers of main sessions.
>>
>>
>>
>> *MAG members on workshops*
>>
>> I have neither mentioned in my email,  nor wish by any means, to
>> recommend that MAG members, who have accepted speaker roles for 3-4 or in
>> some cases, even 5 workshops, should decline at this stage.  That would be
>> terrible for the organizers of those workshops.  My point was limited to
>> responding to the query about MAG members on main sessions only.
>>
>>  The fact that I am on 2 workshops is only self-disclosure.  It is by no
>> means an imposition on others, since their commitments, in any event, were
>> made much before Janis’s email to workshop organizers, and must be honored.
>> Like you, I don’t see Janis’s email of “1/3 max” as a hard and fast, where
>> MAG members on workshops are concerned.
>>
>> I hope this settles the issue for all organizers and MAG members unless
>> anyone has a different interpretation from what has been agreed here.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Virat Bhatia
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/evolintgov2014_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140809/765943b4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Evolintgov2014 mailing list