[Bpf-cybersecurity] Potential topics should the BPF on Cybersecurity be renewed in 2020

[Marilson]

What norms do you refer to? If it is the norms that regulate, the use of
the Internet by their users, such as contracts between users, AUPs, ToSs
and Codes of Conduct, they are not being adhered and are being violated by
everyone with whom I have kept daily contact in the last six years. But
these rules are not being contested except anonymity for bandits denounced
with evidence. There's nothing wrong with these norms, but it's all wrong
with people subject to them.

"To take a closer look at norms assessment" smells really bad. Certainly
this assessment made by people who have defined cybersecurity policies will
result in new standards more "appropriate" to maintaining the current
status quo reducing the possibility of denunciation and contestation.

That's what we'll see.
Marilson


Em dom., 15 de dez. de 2019 às 23:13, Maarten Van Horenbeeck <
maarten at first.org> escreveu:

> Hi everyone,
>
> When the 2020 Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) meets for the first
> time in mid-January, we expect a discussion will take place about which
> Best Practice Forums should be approved for 2020, and the specific topics
> they should cover.
>
> Together with Markus and Ben, I wanted to get some initial conversation
> going on what the BPF could most contribute in 2020.
>
> One potential direction which some people raised in personal discussion in
> Berlin, was to continue down the path we are on - with the OEWG and the
> UNGGE both meeting in 2020; and with new agreements such as the "Contract
> for the Web" having been launched just in November, the topic of norms
> implementation is bound to continue to be of interest. We could continue to
> monitor these changes, and update our learnings to bring more people along.
>
> A second topic, as raised by Mallory in our last call in a slightly
> different context, is to take a closer look at norms assessment. As one of
> the key findings in our report this year, civil society has taken a leading
> role here, but there are other initiatives that assess whether norms are
> being adhered to, are being violated, or are being contested. Perhaps
> taking a closer look at these spaces from a multi-stakeholder perspective
> can add a fair amount of value.
>
> *Before we start working on a proposal, I wanted to ask you all for your
> thoughts, as BPF participants, on areas where you think we can add value -
> or which ones do not. Please feel free to reply to this thread or reach out
> directly.*
>
> Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts; and for the great engagement
> this year.
>
> Best regards,
> Maarten
> --
> Bpf-cybersecurity mailing list
> Bpf-cybersecurity at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf-cybersecurity_intgovforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bpf-cybersecurity_intgovforum.org/attachments/20191216/8ca6123e/attachment.htm>