[Bp_spam] First draft report Regulation and mitigation of Unsolicited Communications - Uitnodiging om het item te bewerken
Neil Schwartzman
neil at cauce.org
Fri Jun 19 07:23:49 EDT 2015
"The data might include information such as underlying numbers on economic impact on different stakeholders, the network costs of fighting spam on a day to day basis, the number of attacks in a particular jurisdiction, the cost of introducing regulation and enforcing it and the impact of spam on new and emerging platforms.”
specific data on the scope impact of spam is extremely problematic in that much of it comes from sources that are biased or perceived to be. Vendors’ statistics suffer from being from one source only and thus are myopic - they only see what they see, and they tend to report the top end, to lend a sense of urgency to a given situation (to which, coincidentally, they have the solution).
M3AAWG has overcome this issue, with their aggregate statistical reports from multiple sources :
https://www.m3aawg.org/m3aawg-reports
as to other economic indicators, I have been doing some evangelizing of BPs of late, in Dublin, in Tunis, and so on. I’ve included some slides from my deck which I think address some of the issues you raise regarding disproportionate impact of spam and other such attacks on developing economies. Sources of the data are extremely credible
Furthermore, as we know, Professor Michel van Eeten presented the keynote at M3 in Dublin and had some extraordinary findings in his research. there again, attached.
Lastly, as to the cost per spam - this is an initiative I happen to be leading at M3 - we want an economic model that allows us to place an agreed-upon cost on a given attack, but that is a work in progress which has not been done in a collaborative approach, previously. To date, we have seen companies makle statements that X cost them $$ but these are quite tenuous and somewhat unsubstantiated. The ‘economics of spam attacks’ project should be able to allow us to better define how much a billion spam cost the target of such an attack.
> http://www.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/TBM/Onderzoek/Publicaties/hosting-metrics.pdf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IGF Stats.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 1525107 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150619/f406139d/attachment.pptx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Hosting_metrics_M3AAWG_Dublin_9Jun2015.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 2172574 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150619/f406139d/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: M3AAWG_econ_botnet_mitigation_10Jun2015.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1904567 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_spam_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150619/f406139d/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
Neil Schwartzman
Executive Director
Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email
http://cauce.org
Tel : (303) 800-6345
Twitter : @cauce
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 04:46, Wout de Natris (via Google Documenten) <wonoblogger at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wout de Natris heeft je uitgenodigd het volgende document te bewerken:
>
> First draft report Regulation and mitigation of Unsolicited Communications
> Dear all,
>
> The BPF on "unsolicited communications" has opened a document in Google Docs with the questions the experts put to you to define the direction of the BPFs work in 2015. Your answers are the basis of the first draft report that is published mid-July.
>
> We take into account that this is an open process and you may not want to share sensitive data this way. Here it is advised to contribute that you are able to provide this data at a later date.
>
> Should you not want to work within this document building process, please send me your comments through the normal channels, so I can collect them and work them into the first draft.
>
> Please send in your comments by Friday next week, 26 June.
>
> Looking forward to your comments and to work with you (again).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wout de Natris
>
> U.N. consultant to the IGF secretariat
> Open in Docs
> Deze e-mail geeft zonder inloggen toegang tot dit item. Stuur deze e-mail alleen door naar mensen die je vertrouwt.
> Google Documenten: maak en bewerk documenten online.
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_spam mailing list
> Bp_spam at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_spam_intgovforum.org
More information about the Bp_spam
mailing list