[Bp_multistakeholder] Follow-up and Recording - Examples of technologies/mechanisms for drafting in multistakeholder settings

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 31/10/2015 5:16 PM, Brian Gutterman wrote:
> During our last call there was a suggestion to brainstorm and compile
> a list of various technologies/mechanisms for shared drafting in
> multistakeholder settings, we can address this question broadly and
> please share to the list any ideas you have in this regard

For drafting we usually use Etherpad, which is free and open source and
can be self-hosted (http://etherpad.org).  For meetings, the free and
open source and self-hostable alternative is Jitmeet
(https://jitsi.org/Projects/JitsiMeet).

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD

Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_multistakeholder_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151031/c35f6e8b/attachment.sig>