[Bp_ipv6] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Results of IPv6 Deployment Survey

[Michael Oghia]

Hi Olivier,

I think Izumi, Sumon, and Wim are the best to answer that, but after
reviewing it, Jordi's first sentence under "takeaways" was:

*"The most worrying takeaway for me from this survey so far is that there
are still a lot of engineers that try to deploy IPv6 the same way they
deploy IPv4, which is plain wrong."*

So, I think that speaks volumes. And the data is very good. Gracias Jordi!

Best,
-Michael


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> could the following be of help to any aspects of our paper?
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Results of IPv6 Deployment Survey
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:12:59 +0100
> From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir at ripe.net> <mir at ripe.net>
> To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> For those of you who missed Jordi Palet's presentation at RIPE 73 in
> Madrid, the summary of his IPv6 deployment survey is now on RIPE Labs:
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/jordipaletm/results-of-the-ipv6-deployment-survey
>
> Kind regards,
> Mirjam Kuehne
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20161115/df3d3d60/attachment.html>