[Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - public input

Anissa BHAR anissa.bhar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 8 03:55:55 EST 2016


Hi
This is the IAB statement about IPv6.
https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/
+1 Brice, We are really very late !
Best
------------------
Anissa BHAR

Technologue Agrégée
Institut Supérieur des Etudes Technologiques de Charguia 
Département Technologies de l’Informatique 
Tunisie
Coordinatrice FabLab Solidaires, AJST 


> On Nov 7, 2016, at 23:56, bp_ipv6-request at intgovforum.org wrote:
> 
> Send Bp_ipv6 mailing list submissions to
> 	bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	bp_ipv6-request at intgovforum.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	bp_ipv6-owner at intgovforum.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bp_ipv6 digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: BPF IPv6 - public input (Brice ABBA)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 22:55:28 +0000
> From: Brice ABBA <briceabba at icloud.com>
> To: Omar de Le?n - Teleconsult <omar.deleon at teleconsult.world>
> Cc: jordi.palet at consulintel.es, bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> Subject: Re: [Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - public input
> Message-ID: <690BC205-0A1E-4BED-90B8-9CC20DE5FE3C at icloud.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi All, 
> People are still saying that AFRINIC, has IPv4, and this is reason why they are still complaisant. This "still have" sound like "enough IPv4" in some people years, and this is completely wrong.
> The problems are:
> -1- Internet penetration rate in Africa is maximum 15%
> -2- NAT-PT is every where we don't even use the small blocs of IPv4 we have
> 
> These are the reasons why we still have IPv4, if ISPs in Africa remove NAT even with this 15% we will exhausted the remaining IPv4 tomorrow...
> 
> So let's talk about Internet like Internet working "end to end" and please let's put the money to be used to buy CGNAT in building reel Internet.
> 
> No excuses, if you need help to deploy ask don't hide... 
> do don't talk
> Try and share
> IPv4 is dead IPv6 is not hot future it was Yesterday we are al late...
> 
> Envoy? de mon iPad Air
> 
>> Le 7 nov. 2016 ? 21:51, Omar de Le?n - Teleconsult <omar.deleon at teleconsult.world> a ?crit :
>> 
>> Jordi, how are you? Please refer to the comments below. Best Regards, Omar
>> 
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> 
>> De: Bp_ipv6 [mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org] En nombre de JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
>> 
>> Enviado el: lunes, 07 de noviembre de 2016 14:19
>> 
>> Para: bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> 
>> Asunto: Re: [Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - public input
>> 
>> Hi Omar, all,
>> 
>> I think this is a very dangerous thinking and seriously terrible for Africa ? let me explain.
>> 
>> I?m talking about:
>> 
>> 1.       Africa still has enough IPv4 addresses and so, by the moment, there should not be noticeable problems not deploying IPv6.
>> 
>> If an executive read this (even many engineers), they will have a broken idea of the situation. This has been the main reason in other regions we didn?t succeeded to deploy IPv6 on time, even in most occasions to prepare for it. This is the reason the ISP didn?t asked for IPv6 support in the CPEs more than 10 years ago, when it was the right time, so the vendors didn?t add support for it, and now because most of the CPEs last for more than 10 years (specially in weakest economies), it may take a lot of extra time or money to replace them and the vendors are waiting like wolfs to sell new CPEs instead of investing in a new firmware version. Same is applicable to OSS, and many other platforms.
>> 
>> 
>> CAF LACNIC document on IPv6 deployment, named ?IPv6 Deployment for Social and Economic Development in Latin America and the Caribbean? shares your general concern (but not about vendors intentions), and it is deeply focused on where we are, why, and what to do now. We focus not only on ISPs, but also on other stakeholders that are main drivers of IPv6, as are governmental institutions and universities. A significant number of cases are presented, including extra region cases, that provide support, together with other fundamentals, to start as soon as possible to do what is included on the bullets 6 and 7.
>> 
>> 
>> Even if you have ?sufficient? IPv4 addresses, you need to START YESTERDAY (today is already too late), to make a medium and long term plan, design your network with IPv6, make your addressing plan, ask the RIR for the correct addressing space, start testing it, and make sure that new acquisitions, even if it will take several years to enable IPv6, have the right IPv6 support.
>> 
>> Even much more, from the IPv6 survey, despite how much training we have provided in LACNIC (and also APNIC, AfriNIC), it is obvious that the ISPs have a broken mind about IPv6. They still look at it as IPv4, so they do very bad things when they deploy it. This will mean the cost will double when they realize it and need to make corrections. Probably many people doing IPv6 trainings (I?ve seen that many times, even from vendors that only want to sell boxes and then provide an ?IPv6 training? for free, or big training companies, etc.), don?t have the *real* knowledge, I mean in the field with real deployment experiences, so they are missing key points y they transmit the information wrongly.
>> 
>> 
>> We have additionally conducted a further thorough investigation through face to face interviews on 10 countries with multiple stakeholders in each of them. Certainly we don?t arrive to the same conclusions.
>> 
>> 
>> 2.       So, ISP that are not needing to replace obsolete equipment has no incentive to deploy IPv6.
>> 
>> Right, not now, but if you don?t have a plan, will keep buying the old ones, and vendors will take advantage of it.
>> 
>> 
>> We have not grasped that situation.
>> 
>> 
>> 3.       If you have enough IPv4 the first incentives to appear shall be content or applications not available at all on IPv4.
>> 
>> Right, but this is already here. IPv6 is mandatory in AppStore, and apps not able to work IPv6-only, are being retired. Most of the developers and I?m sure this is happening as well in Africa, don?t realize it, not to say governments, corporates, etc. If they don?t have this in mind now, if they ISPs don?t deploy IPv6 today, they will be soon in an isolated IPv4-only Internet, unless they spend extra money to do some strange translators from IPv4-only to IPv6-only. The cost of that may be at least a good proportion of the IPv6 deployment cost.
>> 
>> 
>> What happened with Apple is not exactly that the apps will not be available on IPv4 anymore, but that all must support IPv6 only.  
>> 
>> 
>> 5.       Other ISP may be still waiting and thinking that they will be able to use CGNAT, if IPv4 addresses become exhausted.
>> 
>> Yeah, but then you still have the problem as in 3., and addition, you can?t identify attackers in your network, your IPv4 range becomes banned by Sony Play Station (already happening), geolocation and file sharing apps doesn?t work, etc., etc.
>> 
>> 
>> We agree. All what you mention is analyzed on our document, including a valuation of the cost of remaining on CGNAT.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Jordi
>> 
>> 
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> 
>> De: Bp_ipv6 <bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org> en nombre de Omar de Le?n - Teleconsult <omar.deleon at teleconsult.world> Responder a: <omar.deleon at teleconsult.world>
>> 
>> Fecha: lunes, 7 de noviembre de 2016, 17:23
>> 
>> Para: 'abdarahim youssouf' <abdarahim_youssouf at yahoo.fr>, 'Willy MANGA' <mangawilly at gmail.com>, <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>> 
>> Asunto: Re: [Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - public input
>> 
>>    Dear Abdarahim, we have been working deeply on these issues at LACNIC and we got some main conclusions that can be related to Africa.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    1.       Africa still has enough IPv4 addresses and so, by the moment, there should not be noticeable problems not deploying IPv6.
>> 
>>    2.       So, ISP that are not needing to replace obsolete equipment has no incentive to deploy IPv6.
>> 
>>    3.       If you have enough IPv4 the first incentives to appear shall be content or applications not available at all on IPv4.
>> 
>>    4.       One case, among several other cases, is that of Orange that has decided to make an strategic deployment of IPv6 in Africa taking into consideration the above point. They want to be prepared using the time on their side and considering the exhaustion for 2019.
>> 
>>    5.       Other ISP may be still waiting and thinking that they will be able to use CGNAT, if IPv4 addresses become exhausted.
>> 
>>    6.       In these cases we think that the best strategy always will be, at least, to progressively replace obsolete equipment by DS modern one.
>> 
>>    7.       Equipment is not only network assets including the most visible customer access, but mainly the backoffice hard and soft (BSS/OSS, Firewalls, addresses stock management and so on) as well as strong personnel training.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Here is the link to the full report in english: http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/wp-content/caf-lacnic/CAF-LACNIC-IPv6-Deployment-Social-Economic-Development-in-LAC.pdf (Orange case including Africa on page 61)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    An economic model (Spanish) can be reached at: http://stats.labs.lacnic.net/PROYECTOCAF/modelo/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Best Regards, Omar
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    De: Bp_ipv6 [mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org] En nombre de abdarahim youssouf
>> 
>>    Enviado el: domingo, 06 de noviembre de 2016 14:14
>> 
>>    Para: Willy MANGA <mangawilly at gmail.com>; bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> 
>>    Asunto: Re: [Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - public input
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Dear All !
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Some countries like Nigeria ,South Africa, Kenya and Egypt  have implemented IPV6,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Why ipv6 deployment is slow in Africa what to do about-it ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    More an information check this links Ipv6 deployment is slow in Africa <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151018_why_ipv6_deployment_is_slow_in_africa_what_to_do_about_it/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>     Some couuntries Niger , South Sudan, Central Africa Republic and Chad is very lack IPV6 Implemented,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Case in Chad  it has been hold  only 5 Trainings organized by Afrinic with a local hosts ISOC CHAD, HTCE, ADETIC, IPV6 TASK FORCE CHAD, SOTEL CHAD, AUF,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    IPV6 Task force work closely for outreach and Sensitization, we have only 8 LIR, 2 End-Users, and  0 Associate member  to AFRINIC and
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    There is big difference between Chad and South Africa concerning IPV6 Test. for more information see the links below : Chad <http://ipv6-test.com/stats/country/TD> and South Africa <http://ipv6-test.com/stats/country/ZA>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    and also see the link below Delegations AS TD <https://www-public.tem-tsp.eu/~maigron/RIR_Stats/RIR_Delegations/Delegations/ASN/TD.html>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Best Regards
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Youssouf Abdelrahim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    President IPV6 TASK FORCE CHAD
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Le Samedi 5 novembre 2016 18h47, Willy MANGA <mangawilly at gmail.com> a ?crit :
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Hello,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Le 04/11/2016 ? 19:16, bp_ipv6-request at intgovforum.org a ?crit :
>> 
>>> Send Bp_ipv6 mailing list submissions to
>> 
>>> [...]
>> 
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:08:37 +0900 (JST)
>> 
>>> From: ?? ? <izumiokutani at yahoo.co.jp>
>> 
>>> [...]
>> 
>>> It would also be good to hear more cases about African and Middle Eastern case, both successful and challenges.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    In Africa, you should look closer to what Liquid Telecom has achieved in
>> 
>>    Kenya [1] and Zimbabwe [2][3] this year.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    1. https://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/2016-August/002756.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    2. https://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/2016-September/002869.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    3. http://labs.apnic.net/cgi-bin/ccpagev6?c=zw
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    --
>> 
>>    Willy Manga
>> 
>>    freenode: ongolaBoy
>> 
>>    Ubuntu Cameroonian Loco Team
>> 
>>    https://launchpad.net/~manga-willy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>> 
>>    Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> 
>>    Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> 
>>    http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>> 
>>    Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> 
>>    Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> 
>>    http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********************************************
>> 
>> IPv4 is over
>> 
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> 
>> http://www.consulintel.es
>> 
>> The IPv6 Company
>> 
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> 
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> 
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20161107/4ecb759a/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Bp_ipv6 Digest, Vol 17, Issue 9
> **************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20161108/6d11d7a2/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list