[Bp_ipv6] Lacnic's IPv6 Doctor Project
wdegezelle at drmv.be
Sat Jul 30 16:45:35 EDT 2016
Hi Alejandro, Hi All,
Thank you Alejandro for sharing this interesting example.
As Izumi mentioned, this year’s scope is on business and economic incentives and there is no intention to reopen the 2015 document for editing. On the other hand we want to keep the 2015 document ‘alive’ and keep on sharing valuable recent examples with the community.
For this purpose I created an appendix (for now at the end of our google work doc <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7z8MRVBOmBsuWxpl8YivXZWFvksKCq0_ul7TlFJzIU/edit?usp=sharing>) to accommodate new examples and best practices that are within the scope of last year’s BPF. In December we can publish these examples as an update or addendum to the 2015 outcome document, separate from the new 2016 outcome.
For now, I suggest to keep it very simple: title - short description - url .
If others have suggestions or better ideas on how to deal with this, please react on the list.
Consultant IGF BPF IPv6
> On 29 Jul 2016, at 14:55, Izumi_Okutani <izumiokutani at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> Excellent, thanks Alejandro.
> 2016/07/29 18:12、Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com <mailto:alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com>> のメッセージ:
>> So far the questions have had have been more or less technical.
>> However, I do have one in the queue that relates to loosing customers because not supporting IPv6. If we are lucky should be ready in less than a week. I promise to keep you posted regarding this one.
>> El 7/29/2016 a las 3:22 AM, 奥谷 泉 escribió:
>>> Thank you for sharing it Alejandro for a new and interesting inititative. It looks like it would make it easy for people to ask questions about IPv6 deployment and great to know it supports multiple languages.
>>> If there are any questions about business decisions, it would be good to understand what kind of questions people have as reference for this group as well.
>>> The scope of this year's work is on economic element/business cases but if we can still add references to last year's document, I think this project itself would fit in nicely as a reference IMO.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> <mailto:alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com>
>>> To: bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>> Date: 2016/7/28, Thu 22:13
>>> Subject: [Bp_ipv6] Lacnic's IPv6 Doctor Project
>>> This is quick email just to tell about a new project that we have in
>>> Lacnic....., it's called "The IPv6 Doctor". Of course the motivation
>>> behind this project is to encourage the IPv6 adoption.
>>> Basically it's a mailbox where we receive questions about IPv6 and
>>> then we try to find the best responder. Suppose a question is about DNS
>>> & IPv6, then we try to find a person who is willing to answer this
>>> question and so on.
>>> We have had terrific feedback about this project, some people in the
>>> community created a RSS service, added it to iTunes and much more. So
>>> far we have had 10 question and 6 have been already answered.
>>> Podcasts are freely available for download in .mp3 and .ogg format.
>>> We accept questions in Spanish, English & Portuguese but until now we
>>> have only had questions & answers in Spanish.
>>> We released the project in May during our Lacnic 24 event and I will
>>> be giving a short update during Lacnic 25.
>>> The project page can be found here: <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/dripv6es/>http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/dripv6es/ <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/dripv6es/>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org <http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org>
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bp_ipv6