[Bp_ipv6] Call for contributions - Preparation (Feedback to questions by: 22nd July)

Michael Oghia mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 01:36:24 EDT 2016


P.S. And in addition to IPv6 + IoT, would we want to mention 5G?
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/targeted-consultation-co-ordinated-introduction-5g-networks-europe

-Michael



On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> First of all, welcome Eduardo and Guillermo!
>
> Second, Izumi: will we have a section solely dedicated to the connection
> between IPv6 and IoT? (E.g.,
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160412_is_ipv6_an_essential_precondition_for_internet_of_things/
> ).
>
> Lastly, Wim and Izumi: let me know if you need any editing assistance from
> me. I unfortunately suffer from the problem of high enthusiasm but low
> technical knowledge. So, I am happy to help in any other way I can
> (editing, research, outreach, etc.).
>
> Best,
> -Michael
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> Excellent, thank you very much Guillermo, Eduardo!
>>
>>
>> Additional recommendations for Case Studies:
>> Internet banking and mobile banking with IPv6 certainly has strong
>> synergies with the scope of the group this year, and cases which have not
>> been widely shared across different stakeholders much.
>> I appreciate that your volunteering to contact the organisations,
>> Eduardo. I also see Guillermo has listed a few organisations in the Latin
>> American region and has volunteered to contact. Thank you.
>>
>> *I continue to welcome inputs from everyone for case studies, especially
>> for the economies listed.
>> If there are other interesting cases, please also feel free to share and
>> we can discuss whether/how it could fit in.*
>>
>>
>> Economic Analysis:
>> *I welcome contributions on this part (part i) as well. If you can share
>> links, references, they are very much appreciated.*
>>
>> Thank you Guillermo for additional details on the references on the
>> economic analysis.
>> They are helpful reference for part i., on analysis from economic
>> perspective on IPv6 adoption.
>>
>> The presentation shared by Geoff would fit in well on the economic
>> perspective and it is a very helpful reference.
>> Quoting out some of the interesting observations on the current situation
>> which caught my attention:
>>
>>  - While most of the V6 activity in terms of user counts is confined to 30
>> ISPs, just 5 of ISPs have any significant IPv6 deployments
>>  - The 30 largest ISPs service 42% of the entire Internet user population
>>    If these 30 providers were to achieve an average 50% IPv6 uptake in
>> their customer base, then the total IPv6 capability level across would be
>> 20% today, rather than 3.6%
>>  -A number of these largest ISPs operate in the developing world
>>    With a tendency to be late adopters so as to reduce capital risk for
>> their enterprise
>>
>> I see that the presentation also touches on “value” of an ISP's customers
>> in relation to per capita GDP, which is an interesting way of looking at
>> the potential for IPv6 deployment from economic aspect.
>> Many thanks Geoff for sharing the link!
>>
>>
>> Quoting from Marco -
>>
>> What is most interesting in your preso is that it is only a few carriers
>>> that make all the difference right now. As for this project, there appear a
>>> few big parties who, cost or not, have a case for IPv6. Maybe it is worth
>>> going to their public results to see if they are doing better or worse
>>> compared to those who just keep throwing money at IPc4 and NATs, but it
>>> might be hard to come up with something like that in the relative short
>>> time frame we have.
>>>
>>> You happen to know if somebody already looked into this kind of stuff?
>>>
>>
>> *If anyone can recommend people who conducts such analysis, or any
>> analysis which would be relevant for part i. or our work, suggestions are
>> welcome.*
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Izumi
>>
>> On 2016/07/21 10:27, Eduardo Barasal Morales wrote:
>>
>>> *
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>> My name is Eduardo Barasal Morales and I work for the Brazilian Network
>>> Information Center (NIC.br), a non-profit organization that tries to
>>> improve the Internet quality in**Brazil, in a project called IPv6.br. In
>>> this project, our mission is to disseminate knowledge about IPv6 with
>>> courses, web site, book and workshops.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am new at this mailing list and I think I can contribute with the
>>> document “Understanding the commercial and economic incentives beneath a
>>> successful IPv6 deployment” .  I can be the volunteer to contact Uol
>>> (content provider), Globo (content provider), Vivo (large ISP), and
>>> Claro (large ISP). Besides that, I would like to suggest to add other
>>> companies, like Banrisul, a bank that has *I*nternet banking and mobile
>>> banking with IPv6, and Fasternet (small ISP). I will try to find others.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Eduardo Barasal Morales
>>>
>>> *
>>> On 20-07-2016 12:29, Guillermo Cicileo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Izumi:
>>>>
>>>> I've updated the document with organizations from EC, PE and BR.
>>>> Also I added to the brainstorming section some references about
>>>> economic aspects of IPv6 transition and an interactive economic model
>>>> for evaluating the alternatives which is available at LACNIC's IPv6
>>>> Portal.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>        Guillermo.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp
>>>> <mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Dear Colleagues,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      I would like to call for contributions to contents of the output
>>>>      documents.
>>>>
>>>>      IPv6 BPF is looking for contents in two parts.
>>>>
>>>>       i. Analysis from economic perspective on IPv6 adoption
>>>>       ii. Case Studies on business decisions behind IPv6 adoption
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Based on this, I would like to seek for your inputs on three
>>>> points.
>>>>      Thanks to everyone who engage in this group and looking forward to
>>>>      receive your inputs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      *1) Questions to contributors of Case Studies*
>>>>
>>>>      For contributions for ii., I welcome your feedback on the
>>>>      questions for the contributors to the case studies.
>>>>      Once agreed, we would like to request you to reach out to your
>>>>      contacts, based on the list of organisations in 2).
>>>>
>>>>         Draft questions to contributors:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hzk0c_HAvtv1V4uURNWJhFmRNL7NpJGgcoTEtWGHRP8/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>         How to provide inputs          : Please add your comments to
>>>>      the above google doc
>>>>         Close feedback                 : 22nd July UTC23:59
>>>>
>>>>      In the meantime, I encourage you to start reaching out to
>>>>      organisations you have contacts for, before waiting for the
>>>>      questions to be fixed, as heads up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      *2) List of organisations for Case Studies*
>>>>
>>>>      If you know organisations which have commercially deployed IPv6 in
>>>>      the following countries, please list your suggestions in the
>>>>      google doc below.
>>>>      The basic approach is to identify countries with high IPv6
>>>>      deployment rate and to reach out to organisations which have
>>>>      commercially deployed IPv6 in those economies.
>>>>
>>>>         How to provide inputs :
>>>>         Please fill in the table "IV. Volunteers to Collect Case
>>>> Studies"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7z8MRVBOmBsuWxpl8YivXZWFvksKCq0_ul7TlFJzIU/edit
>>>>
>>>>         Time frame: Before the next IPv6 BPF call (Date is currently
>>>>      coordinated by Wim by Doodle Poll)
>>>>                     While this is not final fixed deadline e would like
>>>>      to confirm and review case studies received at the next call.
>>>>
>>>>      This list is based on over 10 % IPv6 Capable, per statistics
>>>>      provided by APNIC labs: http://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/
>>>>      We would need to consider regional balance at the end, as Europe
>>>>      appears at a high rate.
>>>>
>>>>              BE Belgium, Western Europe, Europe
>>>>              US United States of America, Northern America, Americas
>>>>              DE Germany, Western Europe, Europe
>>>>              CH Switzerland, Western Europe, Europe
>>>>              GR Greece, Southern Europe, Europe
>>>>              PT Portugal, Southern Europe, Europe
>>>>              EC Ecuador, South America, Americas
>>>>              LU Luxembourg, Western Europe, Europe
>>>>              PE Peru, South America, Americas
>>>>              EE Estonia, Northern Europe, Europe
>>>>              JP Japan, Eastern Asia, Asia
>>>>              FI Finland, Northern Europe, Europe
>>>>              GB United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
>>>>      Northern Europe, Europe
>>>>              MY Malaysia, South-Eastern Asia, Asia
>>>>              FR France, Western Europe, Europe
>>>>              CA Canada, Northern America, Americas
>>>>              BR Brazil, South America, Americas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      *3) Brainstorming for output document*
>>>>
>>>>      I welcome any other feedback on brainstorming for output document
>>>>
>>>>        How to provide inputs : Please add your comments to the google
>>>>      doc below  (same link as 2))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hzk0c_HAvtv1V4uURNWJhFmRNL7NpJGgcoTEtWGHRP8/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Regards,
>>>>      Izumi
>>>>
>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>>      Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>>      Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>>>      http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20160721/879ccd7c/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list