[Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - 3rd Virtual meeting / summary

Michael Oghia mike.oghia at gmail.com
Mon Aug 15 15:58:53 EDT 2016


Thanks Wim!

-Michael
__________________

Michael J. Oghia
iGmena <http://igmena.org/> communications manager
2016 ISOC IGF returning ambassador
Independent #netgov consultant & editor

Istanbul, Turkey
Skype: mikeoghia
Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> *|* LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the summary of the 3rd BPF IPv6 Virtual meeting. (.pdf
> attached)
>
> Our next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 24 August at noon UTC.
>
> Kind Regards
> Wim
> _________________________
>
> *Wim Degezelle*
> *Consultant IGF BPF IPv6*
> *Consultant IGF BPF on IXPs*
>
>
>
> *‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives beneath a
> successful IPv6 deployment’*
>
> *IGF 2016 – BPF IPv6*
>
> *3rd Virtual Meeting*
>
> 3 August  –  2 pm UTC
>
>
>
>
> *Summary*
>
>
>
> 1.     The 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 held its third open virtual
> (webex) meeting on 3 August 2016 at 2pm UTC. The call was lead by the BPF
> IPv6 Coordinators Ms. Izumi Okutani and Sumon A. Sabir. The coordination of
> the outreach and of the collection of case studies was the main point
> discussed during the meeting.
>
> 2.     The webex recording of the meeting can be accessed at:
> https://intgovforum.webex.com/intgovforum/ldr.php?RCID=
> 01f9c1d1bf53c28cf8672696e4be1e52
>
> 3.     Izumi Okutani gave an update on the IPv6 session at the Asia
> Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum (APrIGF) in Taipei (
> https://2016.aprigf.asia), which she had attended, and shared some
> observations:
>
> - IPv6 is being deployed in urban areas in India, but the replaced
> IPv4-only equipment is now being re-used in the rural areas.
>
> - Areas in the Asia Pacific where the infrastructure is IPv6 enabled,
> still struggle due to not-IPv6-ready end-user equipment.
>
> - A number of big providers in South Korea have decided to enable IPv6.
>
> - Mobile providers in Japan made the commitment to be IPv6 ready by 2017.
>
>
> 4.     It was shared in the chat that since the end of July 2016 T-Mobile
> in the US is providing IPv6 over LTE.
>
> 5.     *Collecting case studies from countries with a high IPv6
> deployment*:
>
> All participants were invited to suggest case studies from countries with
> a high IPv6 deployment rate. There was a call for volunteers to reach out
> to these organizations or companies to collect their case studies.
>
> The collection of case studies is coordinated via the table in the BPF’s
> online brainstorm document: see google doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7z8MRVBOmBsuWxpl8YivXZWFvksKCq0_ul7TlFJzIU/edit?usp=sharing>
> section C, Case Studies.
>
> This document remains open after the call so that people can continue to
> suggest case studies.
>
> 6.     The participants confirmed the template to collect the case
> studies. For each section there is one key question to collect information
> that is essential for the BPF’s topic and a number of additional questions
> in case the responded wants to submit background information.
>
> After the call the template was made available in different formats:
>
> - google survey: https://goo.gl/forms/Lj4t9rPROcjRkl4Y2
>
> - google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hzk0c_
> HAvtv1V4uURNWJhFmRNL7NpJGgcoTEtWGHRP8/edit?usp=sharing
> - word doc: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_2UV5B5mknXM0ZXY2oxMUJNeXc/
> view?usp=sharing
>
> 7.     It was agreed to collect case studies by the *end of August*. The
> next call, which is scheduled for 24 August, will evaluate the feedback
> already received and adjust, if needed, the process to collect case studies.
>
> 8.     Ashley Heineman announced that the NTIA is exploring the
> possibility of issuing a request for comments on a set of similar questions
> and intends to feed information into the BPF.
>
> 9.     Participants exchanged ideas on how to identify and reach out to
> ISPs that successfully deployed IPv6[1] <#m_-2096721272172407043__ftn1>
> and discussed contacting umbrella and sector organizations with members
> that could contribute to the BPF; for example ICCBasis or ETNO (the
> European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association).
>
> Additional suggestions of similar organizations are invited.
>
> 10.  The participants reflected on a zero draft structure for the BPF’s
> final output. (see annex I).
>
> 11.  The BPF will consider countries with more than 10% deployment rate
> as countries with a high deployment. For reasons of consistency, it was
> agreed to use the statistics published by APNIC Labs to define a country’s
> IPv6 deployment rate.
>
> 12.  There was a short exchange of ideas on the possibility to include an
> economic analysis in the BPF’s outcome document. This point needs further
> discussion.
>
> 13.  There was positive feedback on a detailed work plan with suggested
> times and dates for the upcoming Virtual meetings. Upcoming calls will be
> scheduled on Wednesdays, and alternate between noon and 2pm UTC. (see annex
> II)
>
> 14.  All welcomed the proposal to compile a separate document with
> examples and case studies that are shared on the mailing list but better
> fit within the scope of last year’s BPF (creating an enabling environment
> for IPv6 adoption). This list will be published as an update and annex to
> the 2015 BPF outcome document, which was intended to be a living resource.
>
> 15.  Actions and Next steps:
>
> - Outreach and collection of case studies – (soft) deadline end of August.
>
> - Suggest additional case studies and sector or umbrella organizations to
> reach out to on the google brainstorming document.
>
> - Start incorporating content in the zero draft structure.
>
> - Examples, projects and case studies that fit within the BPF 2015 can be
> shared with the mailing list and will be included in the annex.
>
> 16.  Online working documents (link):
>
> * Brainstorming document on contents, with a table to list volunteers
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7z8MRVBOmBsuWxpl8YivXZWFvksKCq0_ul7TlFJzIU/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> *Note*: this google doc also provides links to all other key documents,
> so it may be useful to bookmark!
>
>
>
> * Scope, Structure and Work plan
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IL-WfZtdEIiK8jg6tmP6f3Hs4ehJfsYkK0drEwpS7ZI/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> * Proposed schedule Virtual meetings
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PCCQANKdBfuL6g5HTmZppIUcneJfr7XfM8leooAuP-I/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> * Brainstorming section
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7z8MRVBOmBsuWxpl8YivXZWFvksKCq0_ul7TlFJzIU/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> * Questions for Case studies
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hzk0c_HAvtv1V4uURNWJhFmRNL7NpJGgcoTEtWGHRP8/edit>
>
> * Zero draft structure outcome document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19I25CWf_slhfQed4MCJ6Iqu2ofs0OqJPA8EKONC4ViI/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> * Update 2015 BPF on Creating an Enabling Environment for IPv6 Adoption
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19I25CWf_slhfQed4MCJ6Iqu2ofs0OqJPA8EKONC4ViI/edit?usp=sharing>
>
>
>
> 17.  Practical information
>
> - BPF IPv6 webpage: http://www.intgovforum.org/
> cms/best-practice-forums/bpf-ipv6
>
> - BPF IPv6 mailing list: bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>
>       *(Subscribe at*
> *http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org*
> <http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org>*)*
>
> *- *The next call is scheduled for Wed 24 August at noon UTC
>
>
>
> *- summary by Wim Degezelle*
>
>
>
>
>
> *List of Participants*
>
>
>
> 1.     Guillermo Cicilea
>
> 2.     Olivier Crépin-Leblond
>
> 3.     Wafa Dahmani
>
> 4.     Torbjörn Eklöv
>
> 5.     Andrew Gallo
>
> 6.     Silvia Hagen
>
> 7.     Ashley Heineman
>
> 8.     Aaron Hughes
>
> 9.     Michael Oghia
>
> 10.   Jasper Rappard
>
> 11.   Duraid Silarbi
>
> 12.   Nathalie Trenaman
>
> 13.   Izumi Okutani (BPF coordinator)
>
> 14.   Sumon A. Sabir (BPF coordinator)
>
> 15.   Wim Degezelle (BPF consultant)
>
>
>
> *Annex (I)*
>
>
>
>
>
> *IGF 2016 - Best Practice Forum on IPv6*
>
> *‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives beneath a
> successful IPv6 deployment’*
>
>
>
> Draft structure outcome
>
> *Zero draft*
>
>
>
>
>
> I.               Introduction & Background
>
> ·       about the IGF & BPFs
>
> ·       Why deploying IPv6?
>
> ·       The 2015 BPF ‘Creating and Enabling Environment for IPv6 Adoption’
>
> II.              Scope and Goal of the 2016 BPF ‘Understanding the
> commercial and economic incentives beneath a successful IPv6 deployment.
>
> III.            Facts and Figures - IPv6 deployment
>
> ·       Global
>
> ·       IPv6 champions (countries)
>
> IV.            Understanding the commercial and economic incentives
>
> ·       Case studies (of successful regions)
>
> ·       Findings and conclusions
>
> ·       Remaining challenges
>
> ·       (Economic hypothesis/analysis)?
>
> V.              And the others?
>
> ·       Challenges for regions where where deployment is not taking off
>
> VI.            Conclusions / next steps
>
>
>
> Appendix : new case studies BPF2015
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Annex (II)*
>
>
>
> *IGF 2016 - Best Practice Forum on IPv6*
>
> *‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives beneath a
> successful IPv6 deployment’*
>
>
>
> *Proposed schedule Virtual meetings*
>
>
>
> Call 1: *23 June 4pm UTC*
>
> ·       Introduction
>
> ·       Kick off discussion Scope and goals
>
> Call 2: *2 July noon UTC*
>
> ·       Confirm scope and goals
>
> ·       Discuss proposed structure and work plan
>
> ·       Fact finding (I): collect statistics, identify countries with
> high deployment,
>
> ·       Outreach: Who, in those region can explain who/what is behind the
> high figure.
>
> Call 3: *3 Aug 2pm UTC*
>
> ·       Confirm the countries and cases we want to look at;
>
> ·       Outreach:
>
> ·       Reach out to collect case studies
>
> ·       Discuss questions to ask, “What do we want to know from them?”
>
> Call 4:* 24 Aug noon UTC*
>
> ·       Evaluate the feedback so far:
>
> ·       Discuss content of the case studies;
>
> ·       Need for additional cases and outreach?
>
> ·       Lessons learned and observations
>
> Call 5 / 6: *7 Sept 2pm UTC - 28 Sept noon UTC*
>
> ·       Observations,
>
> ·       List the incentives,
> ·       Look for cases where the found incentives did not work, and try
> to explain why.
>
> ·       (Prepare workshop at IGF)
>
> Call 7: *12 Oct 2pm UTC*
>
> ·       Discuss the feedback received via the public platform
>
> ·       Review and Update the draft document
>
> ·       Prepare workshop and outreach at IGF
>
> ·       Outreach plan: How to reach out on the outcome of the 2015 and
> 2016 BPF outcome?;
>
> Call 8 / 9: *9 Nov noon UTC - 23 Nov 2pm UTC*
>
> ·       Outreach plan: How to reach out on the outcome of the 2015 and
> 2016 BPF outcome?;
>
> ·       Discuss the feedback received via the public platform
>
> ·       Review and Update the draft document
>
> Call 10: begin December
>
> ·       Discussion on the feedback received during the workshop and
> public review platform;
>
> ·       Final review of the document
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [1] <#m_-2096721272172407043__ftnref1> A link was shared of a page that
> list Swedish ISPs and whether the have deployed IPv6  *h*
> ttps://ispmedipv6.se/i <https://ispmedipv6.se/i>* .*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20160815/a678e13d/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list