[Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion

[Miwa Fujii]

Hi Izumi, 

Thanks for your clarification. Much appreciated.

Miwa

On 28/10/2015 6:15 pm, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Hi Miwa,
>
>
>Thanks for sharing the questions. It's good to clarify them for the
>others in this list as well.
>
>> - Will be the name of the organisation listed in the doc?
>
>The name of the organisation which is involved the case studies are
>usually put on the document to acknowledge their work. It also gives
>readers more clear picture.
>However it is not a must if requested otherwise.
>
>> - If you list the org names (that contributed IPv6 information) in the
>> doc, will it be part of the list of “contributors”?
>
>As you can from the current document for public comment, the source of
>information is appended at the end under "APPENDIX".
>
> 
>http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/creating-an-en
>abling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption/
>
>I think this can either be you Miwa or the organisation itself, depending
>on what the contributors prefer.
>
>If they want to know whether there will be a section on thanking the
>contributors, I don't recall we've discussed it.
>
>
>> - If necessary, will it be possible to provide input with anonymous
>>status?
>
>Certainly. It is possible to contribute with anonymous status.
>
>If they have a particular request on how they want to disclose (or not
>disclose their names), feel free to let us know.
>
>
>That is my understanding on the discussions we've had in the group.
>Susan or anyone else, please feel free to chime in if there is anything
>to add/have a different understanding.
>
>
>
>Izumi
>
>
>On 2015/10/28 13:40, Miwa Fujii wrote:
>> Hi Suzan and Izumi,
>> 
>> I got further questions as below from a Japanese org that I have sought
>> their input.
>> 
>> - Will be the name of the organisation listed in the doc?
>> - If you list the org names (that contributed IPv6 information) in the
>> doc, will it be part of the list of “contributors”?
>> - If necessary, will it be possible to provide input with anonymous
>>status?
>> 
>> I am not exactly sure about the intention of the second inquiry but I
>> assume they are interested in how/where you will list their name in the
>> doc.
>> 
>> I’d appreciate your input.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> miwa
>> 
>> On 27/10/2015 5:06 pm, "Bp_ipv6 on behalf of Miwa Fujii"
>> <bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org on behalf of miwa at apnic.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Izumi, 
>>>
>>> Thanks for your clarification.
>>>
>>> Miwa
>>>
>>> On 27/10/2015 4:59 pm, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Miwa,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your help in reaching out to private sectors in Japan.
>>>> I'm sure Susan will get back to you with a comprehensive response - my
>>>> response while waiting for her time zone to be online.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>>>>
>>>> The final document will be produced by a consultant engaged by the IGF
>>>> Secretariat based on the discussions within our group.
>>>> Our consultant is Wim Degezelle. It will then be published on the IGF
>>>> microwebsite for the Best Practices.
>>>>
>>>> Best Practices documents from 2014 may give you some idea (listed in
>>>> "Categories") :
>>>> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/best-practice-forums
>>>>
>>>>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's the idea, to be distributed worldwide.
>>>>
>>>> - Discussed at the IGF in João Pessoa, Brazil with global participants
>>>> (10 to 13 November )
>>>> - Published on the IGF micro website available for anyone to see.
>>>> - We reach out to bodies/organisations in various regions. They can
>>>>help
>>>> us proactively share with their respective stakeholders.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - How do you distribute this document?
>>>>
>>>> As described about, we reach out to various bodies/organisations after
>>>> posting on the IGF microsite.
>>>> The group hasn't yet discussed the specific list of organisations to
>>>> reach out. 
>>>>
>>>> Whether this is just for online sharing, or we would like to have some
>>>> face to face opportunities to present them in any other forums than
>>>>IGF,
>>>> hasn't been discussed, including its needs.
>>>>
>>>>> - Who will receive the document?
>>>>
>>>> IGF secretariat will receive the document, but they publish it on the
>>>> website is open for anyone to read.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean the target reader, one of the stakeholders identified is
>>>> governments. 
>>>> The section on the private sector would serve as a good reference to
>>>> those who are considering to makde a decision on IPv6 deployment in
>>>>their
>>>> networks as well.
>>>>
>>>> Do people see anyone else to add?
>>>>
>>>> Given the government is considered as one of the readers, I suspect it
>>>> would make sense to consider governmental organisations as a potential
>>>> target of outreach.
>>>> Also to national and regional IGFs are where most key update on the
>>>> global IGF are shared.
>>>>
>>>> Suggestions are certainly welcome, if you know any
>>>> community/body/organization who would find value in having this
>>>>document
>>>> shared.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope this helps!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Izumi
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/10/27 9:20, Miwa Fujii wrote:
>>>>> Hi Susan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Susan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I¹ve asked some of orgs in Japan that have already implemented IPv6
>>>>>to
>>>>> provide short texts on 4) Lessen leant from the private sector. They
>>>>>are
>>>>> putting the request through the Internal decision making process,
>>>>>and I
>>>>> got the following questions.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>>>>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>>>>> - How do you distribute this document?
>>>>> - Who will receive the document?
>>>>>
>>>>> I¹d appreciate your input.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> miwa
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Bp_ipv6
>>>>> 
>>>>><bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.or
>>>>>g>
>>>>>>
>>>>> on behalf of Susan Chalmers
>>>>> <susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>
>>>>> Date: Thursday, 22 October 2015 10:39 am
>>>>> To: IGF BPFs 
>>>>><bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>>
>>>>> Subject: [Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> During today's call we addressed a few structural elements of the
>>>>> paper, including highlighting the similarities in best practices
>>>>>between
>>>>> ISPs and content providers, and acknowledging that enterprises are a
>>>>> different story.
>>>>>
>>>>> We also decided to remove the case study section due to time
>>>>> constraints, and to emphasize in the conclusion that the efforts of
>>>>>all
>>>>> stakeholders combine to produce the best possible output, as opposed
>>>>> groups acting independently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, we decided to add a brief section on research and education
>>>>> networks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Taking this into account, I've rearranged the outline, provided
>>>>>below.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to everyone for their contributions today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Susan
>>>>>
>>>>> 4)Lessons from the Private Sector
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In this section we look at best practices identified within private
>>>>> sector organisations, beginning with ISPs and content providers, and
>>>>> ending with enterprises.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A.ISPs and content providers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i)Review existing infrastructure
>>>>>
>>>>> ii)Determine whether vendors are IPv6-ready
>>>>>
>>>>> iii)Training for employees
>>>>>
>>>>> iv)Deploy public-facing IPv6 services
>>>>>
>>>>> v)Migrate to IPv6 on internal networks
>>>>>
>>>>> vi)Set internal deadlines
>>>>>
>>>>> vii)Reach out to customers
>>>>>
>>>>> viii)Consider different approaches to pricing (for ISPs)
>>>>>
>>>>> ix)Plan for the unexpected
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> B.Enterprises
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 5)Research and Education Networks (NRENs)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A.About NRENs (including University service provider relationship)
>>>>>
>>>>> B.Examples
>>>>>
>>>>> i) CERNET
>>>>>
>>>>> ii)Š.
>>>>>
>>>>> iii)Š.
>>>>>
>>>>> v)Š.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Susan Chalmers
>>>>> susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>
>>>>>
>>>>> CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
>>>>> http://chalmers.associates
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>>>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>> 
>