[Bp_ipv6] IGF Best practice document - comment clarification

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sun Nov 29 16:55:04 EST 2015


Hopefuuly !

And happy to keep contributing if needed.

Please send me a link when available, so I can also publish it.

Saludos,
Jordi









-----Mensaje original-----
De: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>
Responder a: <susan at chalmers.associates>
Fecha: domingo, 29 de noviembre de 2015, 21:58
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
Asunto: Re: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification

>Hi Jordi,
>Yes, that is too bad. Regardless, however, I think that the contributions that you have made are valuable and enrich the document. Thank you for your efforts.  
>
>Best,
>Susan
>
>
>
>
>Susan Chalmers
>susan at chalmers.associates
>
>CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
>http://chalmers.associates
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:53 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
>
>Hi Susan,
>
>No need now, I guess it don’t make sense anymore. Anyway, I guess you may choose to use it or not.
>
>What is pity is that once I knew about this document work (by an email from German/APNIC), tried to contact him many times to know how to participate, but never got a response. Probably I could have helped much more since it was started.
>
>Regards,
>Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>
>Responder a: <susan at chalmers.associates>
>Fecha: domingo, 29 de noviembre de 2015, 21:49
>Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>CC: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>Asunto: Re: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification
>
>>Thanks Jordi,
>>The IGF Secretariat provided the platform. You can complain to them if you like.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Susan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Susan Chalmers
>>susan at chalmers.associates
>>
>>CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
>>http://chalmers.associates
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
>>
>>Hi Wim,
>>
>>Yes, I think this comment was not for that paragraph, but reading now the document, I can’t see the other comments I had input, so don’t know how to find it.
>>
>>However, I think reading it, makes sense in the context of any section that is saying something like “some (or this) country has mandated IPv6 support”… Probably, but I’m no longer sure, it was referred to mandating IPv6 support in public procurements ?.
>>
>>I’ve provided to Susan the links for Spain, which I guess are very relevant and key, because was one of the first countries after US.
>>
>>Here are the links for Ecuador:
>>http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-007-2012.pdf
>>
>>http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-039-2012.pdf
>>
>>
>>And in Colombia:
>>
>>http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-5932_documento.pdf
>>
>>
>>I always to comments in word or PDF notes, this format was really bad and not performing very well, it may be depending on the browser or whatever.
>>
>>I worked in projects with hundreds of people contributing to a single word document with track for changes and always worked well that way !
>>
>>Saludos,
>>Jordi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Mensaje original-----
>>De: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
>>Responder a: <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
>>Fecha: jueves, 26 de noviembre de 2015, 18:56
>>Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>>CC: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>Asunto: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification
>>
>>>Dear Jordi,
>>>Thank you again for posting your comments on the BPF review platform. Together with Susan I’m working on the final version of the text.
>>>
>>>I have a question on your comment on par. 186:
>>>
>>>"This has been done already in many countries (I have been contracted to do that, so speaking from the forefront), to mention the public cases:
>>>Spain
>>>Ecuador
>>>Colombia
>>>I can find the links for the documents that are public if you want to mention them. They are LAWS."
>>>
>>>http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption-version-3/#comment-1807
>>>
>>>Could you clarify what ‘this’ is referring to? Would it be possible that this comment goes with another paragraph?
>>>
>>>Best
>>>Wim
>>>
>>>
>>>_________________________
>>>
>>>Wim Degezelle
>>>Consultant
>>>DUERMOVO - DRMV
>>>
>>>
>>>wdegezelle at drmv.be
>
>
>>>mobile +32 475390185 <tel:%2B32%20475390185> <tel:%2B32%20475390185>
>>>skype  w.r.d.d
>>
>>
>>>LinkedIn <https://be.linkedin.com/in/wimdegezelle>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>






More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list