[Bp_ipv6] IGF Best practice document - comment clarification

[Susan Chalmers]

Hi Jordi,

Yes, that is too bad. Regardless, however, I think that the contributions
that you have made are valuable and enrich the document. Thank you for your
efforts.

Best,
Susan



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:53 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:

> Hi Susan,
>
> No need now, I guess it don’t make sense anymore. Anyway, I guess you may
> choose to use it or not.
>
> What is pity is that once I knew about this document work (by an email
> from German/APNIC), tried to contact him many times to know how to
> participate, but never got a response. Probably I could have helped much
> more since it was started.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>
> Responder a: <susan at chalmers.associates>
> Fecha: domingo, 29 de noviembre de 2015, 21:49
> Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> CC: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
> Asunto: Re: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification
>
> >Thanks Jordi,
> >The IGF Secretariat provided the platform. You can complain to them if
> you like.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Susan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Susan Chalmers
> >susan at chalmers.associates
> >
> >CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
> >http://chalmers.associates
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
> jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
> >
> >Hi Wim,
> >
> >Yes, I think this comment was not for that paragraph, but reading now the
> document, I can’t see the other comments I had input, so don’t know how to
> find it.
> >
> >However, I think reading it, makes sense in the context of any section
> that is saying something like “some (or this) country has mandated IPv6
> support”… Probably, but I’m no longer sure, it was referred to mandating
> IPv6 support in public procurements ?.
> >
> >I’ve provided to Susan the links for Spain, which I guess are very
> relevant and key, because was one of the first countries after US.
> >
> >Here are the links for Ecuador:
> >
> http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-007-2012.pdf
> >
> >
> http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-039-2012.pdf
> >
> >
> >And in Colombia:
> >
> >http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-5932_documento.pdf
> >
> >
> >I always to comments in word or PDF notes, this format was really bad and
> not performing very well, it may be depending on the browser or whatever.
> >
> >I worked in projects with hundreds of people contributing to a single
> word document with track for changes and always worked well that way !
> >
> >Saludos,
> >Jordi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Mensaje original-----
> >De: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
> >Responder a: <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
> >Fecha: jueves, 26 de noviembre de 2015, 18:56
> >Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> >CC: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>, IGF BPFs <
> bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
> >Asunto: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification
> >
> >>Dear Jordi,
> >>Thank you again for posting your comments on the BPF review platform.
> Together with Susan I’m working on the final version of the text.
> >>
> >>I have a question on your comment on par. 186:
> >>
> >>"This has been done already in many countries (I have been contracted to
> do that, so speaking from the forefront), to mention the public cases:
> >>Spain
> >>Ecuador
> >>Colombia
> >>I can find the links for the documents that are public if you want to
> mention them. They are LAWS."
> >>
> >>
> http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption-version-3/#comment-1807
> >>
> >>Could you clarify what ‘this’ is referring to? Would it be possible that
> this comment goes with another paragraph?
> >>
> >>Best
> >>Wim
> >>
> >>
> >>_________________________
> >>
> >>Wim Degezelle
> >>Consultant
> >>DUERMOVO - DRMV
> >>
> >>
> >>wdegezelle at drmv.be
> >>mobile +32 475390185 <tel:%2B32%20475390185>
> >>skype  w.r.d.d
> >
> >
> >>LinkedIn <https://be.linkedin.com/in/wimdegezelle>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151129/d0bdec19/attachment.html>