[Bp_ipv6] IGF Best practice document - comment clarification

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Sun Nov 29 15:49:43 EST 2015


Thanks Jordi,

The IGF Secretariat provided the platform. You can complain to them if you
like.

Cheers,
Susan



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:41 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:

> Hi Wim,
>
> Yes, I think this comment was not for that paragraph, but reading now the
> document, I can’t see the other comments I had input, so don’t know how to
> find it.
>
> However, I think reading it, makes sense in the context of any section
> that is saying something like “some (or this) country has mandated IPv6
> support”… Probably, but I’m no longer sure, it was referred to mandating
> IPv6 support in public procurements ?.
>
> I’ve provided to Susan the links for Spain, which I guess are very
> relevant and key, because was one of the first countries after US.
>
> Here are the links for Ecuador:
>
> http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-007-2012.pdf
>
>
> http://www.telecomunicaciones.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/10/Acuerdo-No.-039-2012.pdf
>
>
> And in Colombia:
>
> http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/articles-5932_documento.pdf
>
>
> I always to comments in word or PDF notes, this format was really bad and
> not performing very well, it may be depending on the browser or whatever.
>
> I worked in projects with hundreds of people contributing to a single word
> document with track for changes and always worked well that way !
>
> Saludos,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
> Responder a: <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
> Fecha: jueves, 26 de noviembre de 2015, 18:56
> Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> CC: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>, IGF BPFs <
> bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
> Asunto: IGF Best practice document - comment clarification
>
> >Dear Jordi,
> >Thank you again for posting your comments on the BPF review platform.
> Together with Susan I’m working on the final version of the text.
> >
> >I have a question on your comment on par. 186:
> >
> >"This has been done already in many countries (I have been contracted to
> do that, so speaking from the forefront), to mention the public cases:
> >Spain
> >Ecuador
> >Colombia
> >I can find the links for the documents that are public if you want to
> mention them. They are LAWS."
> >
> >
> http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption/creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption-version-3/#comment-1807
> >
> >Could you clarify what ‘this’ is referring to? Would it be possible that
> this comment goes with another paragraph?
> >
> >Best
> >Wim
> >
> >
> >_________________________
> >
> >Wim Degezelle
> >Consultant
> >DUERMOVO - DRMV
> >
> >
> >wdegezelle at drmv.be
> >mobile +32 475390185
> >skype  w.r.d.d
> >LinkedIn <https://be.linkedin.com/in/wimdegezelle>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151129/f62c7989/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list