[Bp_ipv6] Request for clarification NAT v NAT

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Thu Nov 26 10:13:46 EST 2015


Hello colleagues,

During the discussion, the function of NAT was originally described as the
address space saving kind, and so this was how NAT was treated in the
paper. Through comments made on the review platform, other functions of NAT
were described - more or less enabling translation and thus necessary and
helping the transition.

I want to be sure that the differences here are clear to the reader. Could
someone help shed a bit of light at a high level?

Thanks,
Susan


Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151126/4f279223/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list