[Bp_ipv6] Amendment requests: BP_IPv6 doc

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Mon Nov 2 10:08:09 EST 2015

Hi Miwa, all,

Thank you for your email.

Please note that the draft  is on the IGF platform, available for comment,
here  http://review.intgovforum.org/?p=3987.

The reference to KDDI was removed.

We were not able to accommodate all submitted content in the first draft,
I'm sorry. However, you are very welcome to suggest inserting anonymous
example A via the comment function, where you think it is relevant, given
the flow of the paper.


Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates


On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Miwa Fujii <miwa at apnic.net> wrote:

> Dear Susan,
> Thanks for the link of the final draft:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1opMTP2b-qDwCC0I6nZZRTkOTed-T5t-nz_oEb5zxQ7A/edit?usp=sharing
> Could you please make following two amendments in regards with input from
> Japan?
> 1. Page 2, ToC page, it still said “A case study: KDDI Japan”.  Pls remove
> KDDI.  They prefer to keep anonymous status.
> 2. Input from organisation A (Japan) is missing. Could you please add it
> their input to the doc?
> As for your convenience, I attached the word file once more (I’ve sent
> this file to this list on last sat, 31/10/2015). I provided input from two
> organisations in Japan.
> It would be great if you could send me the link to the final doc.  I would
> like to send the link to orgs who provided input.
> Best regards,
> miwa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151102/60759717/attachment.html>

More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list