[Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion

Miwa Fujii miwa at apnic.net
Sun Nov 1 19:12:46 EST 2015


Hi Suzan,

Organization B in Japan is KDDI and they just reached an internal agreement to put their name onto the text.  Could you please replace Organization B in Japan: Organization B in Japan with KDDI, Japan?

I am looking forward to hearing your reply.  May thanks.

Best regards,

miwa

From: Miwa Fujii <miwa at apnic.net<mailto:miwa at apnic.net>>
Date: Saturday, 31 October 2015 1:18 pm
To: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>
Cc: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion

Dear Susan,

Here is the final texts from two orgs in Japan.  Both of them wish to be anonymous.

Hope this helps.

Thank you.

miwa

From: Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>
Date: Saturday, 31 October 2015 9:24 am
To: Miwa Fujii <miwa at apnic.net<mailto:miwa at apnic.net>>
Cc: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>>, IGF BPFs <bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion

Thank you, Miwa. We'll see how it goes!
We'll need to edit the text into the document before it is due on Monday.
If we do not make this deadline, then your colleagues can always submit comments via the public platform.

Thanks for all of your efforts in this regard.

Sincerely,
Susan



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>

CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Miwa Fujii <miwa at apnic.net<mailto:miwa at apnic.net>> wrote:
Hi Susan,

I am waiting for the final input from two Japanese orgs with IPv6 (both
with anonymous status) .  I think I should receive emails from them at any
time soon.  Once I receive final texts, I will forward them asap but I may
miss the deadline slightly.   Just a heads-up.

Best regards,

miwa

On 28/10/2015 6:31 pm, "Miwa Fujii" <miwa at apnic.net<mailto:miwa at apnic.net>> wrote:

>Hi Izumi,
>
>Thanks for your clarification. Much appreciated.
>
>Miwa
>
>On 28/10/2015 6:15 pm, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>
>>Hi Miwa,
>>
>>
>>Thanks for sharing the questions. It's good to clarify them for the
>>others in this list as well.
>>
>>> - Will be the name of the organisation listed in the doc?
>>
>>The name of the organisation which is involved the case studies are
>>usually put on the document to acknowledge their work. It also gives
>>readers more clear picture.
>>However it is not a must if requested otherwise.
>>
>>> - If you list the org names (that contributed IPv6 information) in the
>>> doc, will it be part of the list of “contributors”?
>>
>>As you can from the current document for public comment, the source of
>>information is appended at the end under "APPENDIX".
>>
>>
>>http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/creating-an-e
>>n
>>abling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption/
>>
>>I think this can either be you Miwa or the organisation itself, depending
>>on what the contributors prefer.
>>
>>If they want to know whether there will be a section on thanking the
>>contributors, I don't recall we've discussed it.
>>
>>
>>> - If necessary, will it be possible to provide input with anonymous
>>>status?
>>
>>Certainly. It is possible to contribute with anonymous status.
>>
>>If they have a particular request on how they want to disclose (or not
>>disclose their names), feel free to let us know.
>>
>>
>>That is my understanding on the discussions we've had in the group.
>>Susan or anyone else, please feel free to chime in if there is anything
>>to add/have a different understanding.
>>
>>
>>
>>Izumi
>>
>>
>>On 2015/10/28 13:40, Miwa Fujii wrote:
>>> Hi Suzan and Izumi,
>>>
>>> I got further questions as below from a Japanese org that I have sought
>>> their input.
>>>
>>> - Will be the name of the organisation listed in the doc?
>>> - If you list the org names (that contributed IPv6 information) in the
>>> doc, will it be part of the list of “contributors”?
>>> - If necessary, will it be possible to provide input with anonymous
>>>status?
>>>
>>> I am not exactly sure about the intention of the second inquiry but I
>>> assume they are interested in how/where you will list their name in the
>>> doc.
>>>
>>> I’d appreciate your input.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> miwa
>>>
>>> On 27/10/2015 5:06 pm, "Bp_ipv6 on behalf of Miwa Fujii"
>>> <bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org> on behalf of miwa at apnic.net<mailto:miwa at apnic.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Izumi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your clarification.
>>>>
>>>> Miwa
>>>>
>>>> On 27/10/2015 4:59 pm, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Miwa,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your help in reaching out to private sectors in Japan.
>>>>> I'm sure Susan will get back to you with a comprehensive response -
>>>>>my
>>>>> response while waiting for her time zone to be online.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>>>>>
>>>>> The final document will be produced by a consultant engaged by the
>>>>>IGF
>>>>> Secretariat based on the discussions within our group.
>>>>> Our consultant is Wim Degezelle. It will then be published on the IGF
>>>>> microwebsite for the Best Practices.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Practices documents from 2014 may give you some idea (listed in
>>>>> "Categories") :
>>>>> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/best-practice-forums
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's the idea, to be distributed worldwide.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Discussed at the IGF in João Pessoa, Brazil with global
>>>>>participants
>>>>> (10 to 13 November )
>>>>> - Published on the IGF micro website available for anyone to see.
>>>>> - We reach out to bodies/organisations in various regions. They can
>>>>>help
>>>>> us proactively share with their respective stakeholders.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> - How do you distribute this document?
>>>>>
>>>>> As described about, we reach out to various bodies/organisations
>>>>>after
>>>>> posting on the IGF microsite.
>>>>> The group hasn't yet discussed the specific list of organisations to
>>>>> reach out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether this is just for online sharing, or we would like to have
>>>>>some
>>>>> face to face opportunities to present them in any other forums than
>>>>>IGF,
>>>>> hasn't been discussed, including its needs.
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Who will receive the document?
>>>>>
>>>>> IGF secretariat will receive the document, but they publish it on the
>>>>> website is open for anyone to read.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you mean the target reader, one of the stakeholders identified is
>>>>> governments.
>>>>> The section on the private sector would serve as a good reference to
>>>>> those who are considering to makde a decision on IPv6 deployment in
>>>>>their
>>>>> networks as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do people see anyone else to add?
>>>>>
>>>>> Given the government is considered as one of the readers, I suspect
>>>>>it
>>>>> would make sense to consider governmental organisations as a
>>>>>potential
>>>>> target of outreach.
>>>>> Also to national and regional IGFs are where most key update on the
>>>>> global IGF are shared.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggestions are certainly welcome, if you know any
>>>>> community/body/organization who would find value in having this
>>>>>document
>>>>> shared.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope this helps!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Izumi
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2015/10/27 9:20, Miwa Fujii wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Susan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Susan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I¹ve asked some of orgs in Japan that have already implemented IPv6
>>>>>>to
>>>>>> provide short texts on 4) Lessen leant from the private sector. They
>>>>>>are
>>>>>> putting the request through the Internal decision making process,
>>>>>>and I
>>>>>> got the following questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Whom do you submit this document?
>>>>>> - Will this document be distributed worldwide?
>>>>>> - How do you distribute this document?
>>>>>> - Who will receive the document?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I¹d appreciate your input.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> miwa
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Bp_ipv6
>>>>>>
>>>>>><bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org><mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.o<mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.o>
>>>>>>r
>>>>>>g>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> on behalf of Susan Chalmers
>>>>>> <susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates><mailto:susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>>
>>>>>> Date: Thursday, 22 October 2015 10:39 am
>>>>>> To: IGF BPFs
>>>>>><bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org><mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>>>
>>>>>> Subject: [Bp_ipv6] Following today's discussion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> During today's call we addressed a few structural elements of the
>>>>>> paper, including highlighting the similarities in best practices
>>>>>>between
>>>>>> ISPs and content providers, and acknowledging that enterprises are a
>>>>>> different story.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We also decided to remove the case study section due to time
>>>>>> constraints, and to emphasize in the conclusion that the efforts of
>>>>>>all
>>>>>> stakeholders combine to produce the best possible output, as opposed
>>>>>> groups acting independently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lastly, we decided to add a brief section on research and education
>>>>>> networks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Taking this into account, I've rearranged the outline, provided
>>>>>>below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to everyone for their contributions today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>> Susan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4)Lessons from the Private Sector
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this section we look at best practices identified within private
>>>>>> sector organisations, beginning with ISPs and content providers, and
>>>>>> ending with enterprises.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A.ISPs and content providers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i)Review existing infrastructure
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ii)Determine whether vendors are IPv6-ready
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iii)Training for employees
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iv)Deploy public-facing IPv6 services
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v)Migrate to IPv6 on internal networks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vi)Set internal deadlines
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vii)Reach out to customers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> viii)Consider different approaches to pricing (for ISPs)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ix)Plan for the unexpected
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.Enterprises
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5)Research and Education Networks (NRENs)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A.About NRENs (including University service provider relationship)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.Examples
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i) CERNET
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ii)Š.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iii)Š.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v)Š.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Susan Chalmers
>>>>>> susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates><mailto:susan at chalmers.associates<mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CHALMERS & ASSOCIATES
>>>>>> http://chalmers.associates
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>>>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org<mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>
>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151102/52966814/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list