[Bp_ipv6] [Intersessional_2015] BPF on IPv6; Problem Definition
sanjaya at apnic.net
Mon Jun 1 22:38:30 EDT 2015
Yup, something like that, but target ALL industry (i.e. multi-stakeholder, not just the Internet Industry players).
From: Miwa Fujii
Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2015 11:35 AM
To: Sanjaya Sanjaya; intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org; bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
Subject: Re: [Bp_ipv6] [Intersessional_2015] BPF on IPv6; Problem Definition
Just to support Sanjaya¹s input. APNIC has following consolidated
On 2/06/2015 10:03 am, "Sanjaya Sanjaya" <sanjaya at apnic.net> wrote:
>May I suggest that the document is also targeted to all executives
>(CxOs?) of all industries? And yes, that should include Finance and HR
>executives. The executive summary must be written in a language that
>all execs can understand.
>From: Bp_ipv6 [mailto:bp_ipv6-bounces at intgovforum.org] On Behalf Of
>Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2015 2:31 AM
>To: intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org; bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>Subject: Re: [Bp_ipv6] [Intersessional_2015] BPF on IPv6; Problem
>... snip ...
> * Target of this document *
> From what has been listed in the group so far:
> - Governments and policy makers (Listed by several participants,
>no objections observed)
> - Possible other stakeholders from the course of the discussions:
> Suppliers of products?
> Industry Association of the suppliers?
> Business Users? (Users of those equipment)
> Those who wish to build a community/Forum (e.g. IPv6 TF)?
> Question: Ayone else? Do we consider all stakeholders in IPv6
>adoption as the target of this document or do we just focus on (a)
>certain stakeholder(s) as the target of this document?
>Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
More information about the Bp_ipv6