[Bp_ipv6] IPv6 Task Forces: Let's get this conversation started!

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Sat Jul 25 14:07:32 EDT 2015


Hi Carl,

Could you please add these to the IPv6 BPF repository?

Many thanks,
Susan




Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Alejandro Acosta <
alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Susan,
>   Thanks for your time reading the Venezuelan's case and looking for the
> LACTF twitter account.
>   My comments inline:
>
> El 7/23/2015 a las 10:24 PM, Susan Chalmers escribió:
>
> Thank you kindly, Nathalie and Alejandro,
>
>  We are collecting different practices and illustrations through the
> aforementioned survey, so people are welcome of course to dedicate their
> energies there on IPv6 Task Forces (and other practices of course).
>
>  We may as well also make use of this list for discussion in the
> meantime. Oftentimes things come up in conversation that end up being
> particularly valuable for the outcome document.
>
>  @Alejandro - thanks for sharing information on the regional LAC-TF
> <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/en/> (I'm now a follower on twitter)
>
>
> Good!.., I saw the email from twitter, now I'm following you back (until
> the new chair gets full control of the twitter accounts :-)
>
>  and your "local" example (using the local/regional/global categories) in
> Venezuela. The policy paper that you pointed us to is one *excellent* example
> of what we are looking for. I'm going to *paraphrase* from the paper, if
> you don't mind, to show others on the list the recommendations to
> government.
>
>
> No problem at all..., the information is public.
>
>
>
>    1. require the sites and systems of institutions & public sector
>    agencies to support IPv6 & IPv4 concurrently.
>    2. empower the national regulator to ensure that hardware in Venezuela
>    whether imported or domestic (Alejandro, would appreciate your confirmation
>    here) supports IPv6 and IPv4 concurrently.
>
>
> Exactly, this is part of our suggestions within the document.
>
>
>
>    1. require the national regulator to do what it needs to do to ensure
>    that domestic ISPs support IPv6 in coexistence with IPv4.
>    2. *require* the National Telecommunications Commission CONATEL,
>    implementation of necessary actions so that Internet Service Providers ISPs
>    set their plans for addressing and based on the same start procedures for
>    requesting resources IPv6 addressing.  <------(this one I did not
>    paraphrase, as I don't quite understand)
>
>
> What we are looking for is Conatel to encourage ISPs to deploy IPv6. One
> way (BTW, this could be another practice) is to give tax discounts to ISPs
>
>
>   At your discretion, it would be nice to have an update on the reception
> of these recommendations by the government, if appropriate and available.
> When you presented these to the policymakers, what examples or
> hypotheticals did you find to be most convincing for them? How do you best
> convey the importance of IPv6 adoption?
>
>
> Of course!. It was given to Conatel's president in a very important
> meeting, Rodrigo de la Parra was there. Here is his tweet:
> https://twitter.com/rdelapar/status/499284689367363585/photo/1
> In the other hand, the case was presented by Gregorio Manzano (Venezuelan
> IPv6 enthusiast) during Lacnic 23. It's available here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNSdvX2bYNM
>
>
>  Speaking of hypotheticals, I enjoyed this one:
> <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/en/the-sad-tale-of-the-isp-that-didnt-deploy-ipv6/>
> http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/en/the-sad-tale-of-the-isp-that-didnt-deploy-ipv6/
>
>
> Great!.
> A group of Mexican friends also created an animation:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DOcc18Bj2U  (unfortunately only in
> Spanish, it would be great to have it in other languages)
>
> Regards,
> Alejandro,
>
>
>  Has anyone else on this list have any experience with producing a set of
> policy recommendations to their government? If so, please feel welcome to
> share.
>
>  Cheers,
> Susan
>
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Nathalie Trenaman < <nathalie at ripe.net>
> nathalie at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Susan,
>>
>>  Thanks for the survey. I have sent it to my contacts at the UK, BE, NL,
>> CH and SI IPv6 task forces. I believe some of them already filled in the
>> survey.
>>
>>  With kind regards,
>>
>>   Nathalie Künneke-Trenaman
>> IPv6 Program Manager
>> RIPE NCC
>>
>>
>>  On 22 Jul 2015, at 23:27, Susan Chalmers < <susan at chalmers.associates>
>> susan at chalmers.associates> wrote:
>>
>>  Dear colleagues,
>>
>>  I hope this email finds you all well.
>>
>>  You will have seen the survey <http://goo.gl/forms/JyD72Qnmc2> that Wim
>> sent out recently. I hope that you find some time to contribute a response.
>>
>>  In the meantime, let's get a conversation started on IPv6 Task Forces.
>>
>>  This is an open call to anyone and everyone who has organized or
>> participated in an IPv6 Task Force, a "best practice" identified early on
>> in our conversations on this list.
>>
>>  Please share this invitation widely.
>>
>>  Let us begin a discussion on how you/your organization has gone about
>> organizing the task force -- e.g. the stakeholders involved, your goals,
>> whether they were achieved, hurdles, successes, etc.
>>
>>  If you feel comfortable, please reply in full to the list so that we
>> can entertain a discussion amongst ourselves.
>>
>>  Remember that the goal of this exercise is to provide guidance to
>> groups who may be interested in setting up their own IPv6 Task Force
>> initiative.
>>
>>  Thanks, and I hope to hear from you soon!
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>> Susan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Susan Chalmers
>> susan at chalmers.associates
>>
>> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
>> http://chalmers.associates
>>     _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing listBp_ipv6 at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150725/37d013b0/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list