[Bp_ipv6] IPv6 Task Forces: Let's get this conversation started!
susan at chalmers.associates
Thu Jul 23 22:54:27 EDT 2015
Thank you kindly, Nathalie and Alejandro,
We are collecting different practices and illustrations through the
aforementioned survey, so people are welcome of course to dedicate their
energies there on IPv6 Task Forces (and other practices of course).
We may as well also make use of this list for discussion in the meantime.
Oftentimes things come up in conversation that end up being particularly
valuable for the outcome document.
@Alejandro - thanks for sharing information on the regional LAC-TF
<http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/en/> (I'm now a follower on twitter) and your
"local" example (using the local/regional/global categories) in Venezuela.
The policy paper that you pointed us to is one *excellent* example of what
we are looking for. I'm going to *paraphrase* from the paper, if you don't
mind, to show others on the list the recommendations to government.
1. require the sites and systems of institutions & public sector
agencies to support IPv6 & IPv4 concurrently.
2. empower the national regulator to ensure that hardware in Venezuela
whether imported or domestic (Alejandro, would appreciate your confirmation
here) supports IPv6 and IPv4 concurrently.
3. require the national regulator to do what it needs to do to ensure
that domestic ISPs support IPv6 in coexistence with IPv4.
4. *require* the National Telecommunications Commission CONATEL,
implementation of necessary actions so that Internet Service Providers ISPs
set their plans for addressing and based on the same start procedures for
requesting resources IPv6 addressing. <------(this one I did not
paraphrase, as I don't quite understand)
At your discretion, it would be nice to have an update on the reception of
these recommendations by the government, if appropriate and available. When
you presented these to the policymakers, what examples or hypotheticals did
you find to be most convincing for them? How do you best convey the
importance of IPv6 adoption?
Speaking of hypotheticals, I enjoyed this one:
Has anyone else on this list have any experience with producing a set of
policy recommendations to their government? If so, please feel welcome to
susan at chalmers.associates
*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie at ripe.net>
> Hi Susan,
> Thanks for the survey. I have sent it to my contacts at the UK, BE, NL, CH
> and SI IPv6 task forces. I believe some of them already filled in the
> With kind regards,
> Nathalie Künneke-Trenaman
> IPv6 Program Manager
> RIPE NCC
> On 22 Jul 2015, at 23:27, Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates>
> Dear colleagues,
> I hope this email finds you all well.
> You will have seen the survey <http://goo.gl/forms/JyD72Qnmc2> that Wim
> sent out recently. I hope that you find some time to contribute a response.
> In the meantime, let's get a conversation started on IPv6 Task Forces.
> This is an open call to anyone and everyone who has organized or
> participated in an IPv6 Task Force, a "best practice" identified early on
> in our conversations on this list.
> Please share this invitation widely.
> Let us begin a discussion on how you/your organization has gone about
> organizing the task force -- e.g. the stakeholders involved, your goals,
> whether they were achieved, hurdles, successes, etc.
> If you feel comfortable, please reply in full to the list so that we can
> entertain a discussion amongst ourselves.
> Remember that the goal of this exercise is to provide guidance to groups
> who may be interested in setting up their own IPv6 Task Force initiative.
> Thanks, and I hope to hear from you soon!
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bp_ipv6