[Bp_ipv6] Draft Timelies

Tue Jul 14 09:57:35 EDT 2015

Hi Izumi,

Thanks for sharing this.

Major concern for me is the order of things. Would strongly advise to delay the call for contributions until we narrowed down the text for the background document.

The BG as I understood should be the introduction and guide the responses we collect. Opening the call before this document is (nearly) finished opens for some risks

- We might get irrelevant responses that are all over the place and/or out of scope
- Consolidating them into a coherent document in line with the BG becomes very hard
- Ignoring them will be even harder, opening up to all sorts of complaints to the process

So I would rather focus the coming two weeks to two main things:

- As a group strategies to where to solicit for contributions, making sure we get balanced input from different stakeholders
- Wrap up the main body of the BG to have at least a final draft when the call goes out and refer to it as guidance

Further down in the process:

- Just open the call for all categories at once, using BG to scope, steer and keep responses manageable.

We probably can’t draft all together, so why not have Wim go over a few iterations where we have short but clearly defined cycles where a draft is open for comments. I would also encourage the coordinators to clearly define the drafting process (UN-style) and after the first round of comments use bracketed text presenting alternatives for the group to discuss. This will focus the discussion on the controversial points and hopefully makes it easier to reach rough consensus on the outcome documents.

Cheers,

MarcoH
PS: maybe also tighten down the method of editing the BG document, formalising the process just a tiny bit more

> On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:38, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> 
> Please find draft timelines for agenda "6. Timelines and the next steps" at the call.
> This is a reference as starting point of disucssions and your feedback is welcome.
> 
> It is currently set to publish output document in September to be in line with other Best Practices Groups, which then allows at least one month of public comments.
> 
> 14th July: Open call for contribution
>            Discuss categories of measures and activities
> 
> 21th July: Agree on components of the background paper
> 29th July: Freeze the text of the background paper
> 
> 31ty July: Publish the Backroud Paper
> 
> 5th  Aug: Discussion on categories A and B + draft text 
> 12th Aug: Discussion on categories C and D + draft text 
> 
> 15th Aug: Deadline of contributions 
> 
> 26th Aug: Discussion on categories E + F + draft text 
> 
> 2nd  Sep: Analysis
> 16th Sep: Freeze the text of the output document
> 18th Sep: Publish output document
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Izumi
> 
> 
> On 2015/07/14 17:20, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I would like to invite you to join us in the call on Tuesday 14th July, UTC14:00.
>> 
>> Please see below for the details on how to register and to get instructions to join.
>> 
>> Register <https://intgovforum.webex.com/intgovforum/j.php?RGID=r3f8853e31f860e3b0d42630d62778939>
>> After your request has been approved, you'll receive instructions for joining the meeting.If you already registered for this meeting, you do not need to register again.
>> 
>> 1. Agenda Review
>> 2. Status update 
>> 3. Background Document
>> 4. Outcome Document Structure 
>> 5. Best Practices: Open call for Contributions
>> 6. Timelines and the next steps
>> 7. Next call
>> 8. AOB
>> 
>> As we will be making an open call for contributions shortly, we would like to discuss at the coming call, the area to focus and how we compile them into a document.
>> 
>> * Measuring and sharing information on the status of IPv6 deployment
>> * Community Building
>> * Capacity Building
>> * Outreach and awareness raising
>> * Knowledge and experience sharing
>> * Incentives stimulating IPv6 uptake
>> 
>> More on an administrative topic, I would like to suggest setting some regularity for the calls, possibly rotating between a set of times.
>> e.g., every first Wednesday UTC13:00, every third Thurday 6:00am UTC 
>> 
>> If people think this is a good idea at the call, we will follow up on the e-mail about the timing of the calls. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Izumi on behalf of the Coordinators
>> 
>> 
>> On 2015/07/11 21:24, Wim Degezelle wrote:
>>> Dear All, 
>>> 
>>> I'd like to remind you that a doodle poll to plan our next BPF IPv6 call is still open.
>>> Please indicate your availability before Monday 13 July, noon UTC.
>>> 
>>> http://doodle.com/7w6mewn9ggpwb469 <http://doodle.com/7w6mewn9ggpwb469>
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your cooperation!
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Wim
>>> 
>>> Contributions invited on: Draft background paper <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iz9xrMs7njqmVo-8Gp_XEHk72--2vAx55o_sQSCLlAY/edit>
>>> 
>>> IGF 2015 BPF IPv6 website <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/best-practice-forums/5-creating-an-enabling-environment-for-ipv6-adoption>
>>> IGF 2015 BPF IPv6 mailing list <http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _________________________
>>> 
>>> Wim Degezelle
>>> wdegezelle at drmv.be
>>> mobile +32 475390185
>>> skype  w.r.d.d
>>> LinkedIn <https://be.linkedin.com/in/wimdegezelle>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intersessional_2015 mailing list
>>> Intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/intersessional_2015_intgovforum.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intersessional_2015 mailing list
>> Intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/intersessional_2015_intgovforum.org
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org