[Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - call for contribution and updates

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Fri Jul 10 00:47:55 EDT 2015


Thanks, Alejandro!

Cheers,
Susan



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Alejandro Acosta <
alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi There..., as a comment, I wrote few things on the document.
>
> Alejandro Acosta,
>
>
>
> El 7/9/2015 a las 9:14 PM, Susan Chalmers escribió:
>
> Hi Chip, all,
>
>  Just to ensure clarity, the two documents attached in Wim's email relate
> to one publication - the *Background Paper*.
>
>  The first document shared is a collection space for text, while the
> second document is just the outline for the background paper - to give an
> overview of the structure of the paper at a glance.
>
>  We will soon be sending out a template for the collection of best
> practices, which will form the basis for the final outcome document and the
> session at the IGF2015.
>
>  We could really use more contributions to the background document,
> particularly in the section that explains or paints the aspirational
> reasons for adopting IPv6.
>
>  Can I please ask everyone on the list to add some text, thoughts,
> reflections, and citations to the below section in particular (as well as
> all other parts of the document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iz9xrMs7njqmVo-8Gp_XEHk72--2vAx55o_sQSCLlAY/edit?usp=sharing>,
> based upon your availability)?
>
>  We'd like to publish this document next week, and the more participants
> who share their knowledge on this list the better the output!
>
>
>    1. positive reasons to adopt v6
>       1.
>
>       Wider applications beyond conventional use such as homenet, which
>       can lead to client to client communication rather than the client server
>       model / Internet of Things
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    End-to-end reachability
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    Ability to plan a 10+ year (IPv6) architecture rather than 2- years
>    (IPv4)
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    Simplifies security policies
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    Scalability
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    Mobile?
>
>  <text>
>
>    1.
>
>    Spurring economic growth (via new technology innovations)
>
>  <text>
>
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chip,
>>
>>  Yes, you understood this correctly.
>> In a couple of days we will send out a template to describe and submit
>> Best practice examples. These will then be analysed and discussed in a
>> separate document that follows after the background paper.
>>
>>  Thank you for the linkt to the Cisco forecasts!
>>
>>  Best Regards
>> Wim
>> _________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On 07 Jul 2015, at 19:08, Chip Sharp (chsharp) <chsharp at cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Dear Wim, all,
>>
>>  Thank you for your work.
>> I want to make sure I understand the plan.  It looks like two documents
>> are planned.  This background document will set the stage and a second
>> document will contain the best practices.  Is this correct?
>>
>>  Also, it might be useful to provide some forecasts in the Context
>> section.  Cisco just updated its Visual Networking Index at
>> http://www.cisco.com/go/vni
>> For example, the VNI forecasts that by 2019 there will be 24 billion
>> networked devices and connections globally.  This is almost 6 times the
>> number of unique IPv4 addresses available.  There will also be nearly 3.9
>> billion Internet users.  These growth projections assume that addressing
>> and routing will not become a bottleneck.  They also assume an enabling
>> environment that will support the growth.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chip
>>
>>  On Jul 7, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Wim Degezelle < <wdegezelle at drmv.be>
>> wdegezelle at drmv.be> wrote:
>>
>>  Dear All,
>>
>>  So far we've discussed the Scope and Goals of the BPF IPv6 and the
>> structure for the Background paper.
>>
>>  You now are invited to contribute with comments and suggestions for the
>> content of the background paper. The Background paper serves as an
>> introduction to the actual Best Practices and aims at explaining to a wide
>> and mainly non-technical audience what IPv6 is, why it should be deployed
>> and what challenges are there are.
>>
>>  Please add your suggestions to the draft document before 14th July:
>>
>>  Draft Background Document (v1) Please suggest you changes
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iz9xrMs7njqmVo-8Gp_XEHk72--2vAx55o_sQSCLlAY/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>  for reference:  Structure for the Background document (not editable)
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RpbSFQ62vrrkZTyLRwAJ2jhJqN678Rr4CRalVIWt6wk/edit?usp=sharing
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RpbSFQ62vrrkZTyLRwAJ2jhJqN678Rr4CRalVIWt6wk/edit>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Based on your contributions we will compile a new version to discuss at
>> the next call on 14 or 15 July.
>> Please fill in the Doodle  to schedule this meeting:
>> <http://doodle.com/7w6mewn9ggpwb469>http://doodle.com/7w6mewn9ggpwb469 .
>>
>>
>>  By the end of the week we will start collecting Best practice examples.
>> For this we are currently working on a template which will be shared with
>> you.
>>
>>  Thank you for your cooperation!
>> Kind Regards
>>
>>  Izumi, Susan, German and Wim
>>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing listBp_ipv6 at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150710/f38ad73d/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list