[Bp_ipv6] BPF IPv6 - call for contribution and updates

Alejandro Acosta alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 00:26:03 EDT 2015


Hi There..., as a comment, I wrote few things on the document.

Alejandro Acosta,


El 7/9/2015 a las 9:14 PM, Susan Chalmers escribió:
> Hi Chip, all,
>
> Just to ensure clarity, the two documents attached in Wim's email
> relate to one publication - the /Background Paper/. 
>
> The first document shared is a collection space for text, while the
> second document is just the outline for the background paper - to give
> an overview of the structure of the paper at a glance.
>
> We will soon be sending out a template for the collection of best
> practices, which will form the basis for the final outcome document
> and the session at the IGF2015.
>
> We could really use more contributions to the background document,
> particularly in the section that explains or paints the aspirational
> reasons for adopting IPv6. 
>
> Can I please ask everyone on the list to add some text, thoughts,
> reflections, and citations to the below section in particular (as well
> as all other parts ofthe document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iz9xrMs7njqmVo-8Gp_XEHk72--2vAx55o_sQSCLlAY/edit?usp=sharing>,
> based upon your availability)?
>
> We'd like to publish this document next week, and the more
> participants who share their knowledge on this list the better the output!
>
>  1. positive reasons to adopt v6
>     1.
>
>         Wider applications beyond conventional use such as homenet,
>         which can lead to client to client communication rather than
>         the client server model / Internet of Things
>
> <text>
>
> 2.
>
>     End-to-end reachability
>
> <text>
>
> 3.
>
>     Ability to plan a 10+ year (IPv6) architecture rather than 2-
>     years (IPv4)
>
> <text>
>
> 4.
>
>     Simplifies security policies
>
> <text>
>
> 5.
>
>     Scalability
>
> <text>
>
> 6.
>
>     Mobile?
>
> <text>
>
> 7.
>
>     Spurring economic growth (via new technology innovations)
>
> <text>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Susan
>
>
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be
> <mailto:wdegezelle at drmv.be>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Chip,
>
>     Yes, you understood this correctly.
>     In a couple of days we will send out a template to describe and
>     submit Best practice examples. These will then be analysed and
>     discussed in a separate document that follows after the background
>     paper.
>
>     Thank you for the linkt to the Cisco forecasts!
>
>     Best Regards
>     Wim
>     _________________________
>
>
>
>
>>     On 07 Jul 2015, at 19:08, Chip Sharp (chsharp) <chsharp at cisco.com
>>     <mailto:chsharp at cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear Wim, all,
>>
>>     Thank you for your work.
>>     I want to make sure I understand the plan.  It looks like two
>>     documents are planned.  This background document will set the
>>     stage and a second document will contain the best practices.  Is
>>     this correct?
>>
>>     Also, it might be useful to provide some forecasts in the Context
>>     section.  Cisco just updated its Visual Networking Index at
>>     http://www.cisco.com/go/vni 
>>     For example, the VNI forecasts that by 2019 there will be 24
>>     billion networked devices and connections globally.  This is
>>     almost 6 times the number of unique IPv4 addresses available. 
>>     There will also be nearly 3.9 billion Internet users.  These
>>     growth projections assume that addressing and routing will not
>>     become a bottleneck.  They also assume an enabling environment
>>     that will support the growth. 
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Chip
>>
>>>     On Jul 7, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Wim Degezelle <wdegezelle at drmv.be
>>>     <mailto:wdegezelle at drmv.be>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Dear All,
>>>
>>>     So far we've discussed the Scope and Goals of the BPF IPv6 and
>>>     the structure for the Background paper.
>>>
>>>     You now are invited to contribute with comments and suggestions
>>>     for the content of the background paper. The Background paper
>>>     serves as an introduction to the actual Best Practices and aims
>>>     at explaining to a wide and mainly non-technical audience what
>>>     IPv6 is, why it should be deployed and what challenges are there
>>>     are.
>>>
>>>     Please add your suggestions to the draft document before 14th July:
>>>
>>>     Draft Background Document (v1) Please suggest you changes
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iz9xrMs7njqmVo-8Gp_XEHk72--2vAx55o_sQSCLlAY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>     for reference:  Structure for the Background document (not
>>>     editable) 
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RpbSFQ62vrrkZTyLRwAJ2jhJqN678Rr4CRalVIWt6wk/edit?usp=sharing
>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RpbSFQ62vrrkZTyLRwAJ2jhJqN678Rr4CRalVIWt6wk/edit>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Based on your contributions we will compile a new version to
>>>     discuss at the next call on 14 or 15 July. 
>>>     Please fill in the Doodle  to schedule this meeting:
>>>      http://doodle.com/7w6mewn9ggpwb469 .
>>>
>>>
>>>     By the end of the week we will start collecting Best practice
>>>     examples. For this we are currently working on a template which
>>>     will be shared with you.
>>>
>>>     Thank you for your cooperation!
>>>     Kind Regards
>>>
>>>     Izumi, Susan, German and Wim 
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>>     Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>>>     http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>     Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>     http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150709/e55e524a/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list