[Bp_ipv6] Request for clarification NAT v NAT

[Susan Chalmers]

Thank you kindly, Alejandro!



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Alejandro Acosta <
alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Susan, great & congrats for so great work.
>
>
> El 11/30/2015 a las 9:03 PM, Susan Chalmers escribió:
>
> Hi Marco, all,
>
> Thanks for this conversation. The text is closed - it was closed last
> night. Wim is putting in the final touches. I did reference the DNS
> resolution / DNSSEC problems.
>
> This was a very helpful conversation. And held constructively - thank you.
>
> We will circulate the final doc asap.
>
> Warm regards,
> Susan
>
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>> > On 30 Nov 2015, at 19:46, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
>> >
>> >> I fully agree with Patrik (and of course with Marco who supports
>> Patrik's comment). I believe we should mention the impact of NAT64 in
>> DNSSEC.
>> >> My only concern is that we will always be missing something..., I
>> mean, to satisfy everyone's point of view regarding NAT (concepts,
>> functioning, etc) will be almost impossible.
>> >
>> > Sure! Any alternative text that do explain that "NAT within a protocol
>> is ugly but easy, NAT between protocols is more complicated" is fine with
>> me. :-) Even if it is "catch all".
>>
>> As we set out to write a non-technical document, I would not go much
>> further into detail. Also please realise that we are passed deadlines,
>> prefer not to open text any further.
>>
>> Maybe we can include a footnote with a reference to a more in-depth
>> technical document that explains the finer details, anybody got a pointer?
>> Or if not possible to add to the text, maybe we can ask the secretariat to
>> add it to the list of supporting documents already on the website.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Marco
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing listBp_ipv6 at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151201/b0fe9e70/attachment.html>