[Bp_ipv6] Request for clarification NAT v NAT

Alejandro Acosta alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 06:10:39 EST 2015


Susan, great & congrats for so great work.

El 11/30/2015 a las 9:03 PM, Susan Chalmers escribió:
> Hi Marco, all,
>
> Thanks for this conversation. The text is closed - it was closed last
> night. Wim is putting in the final touches. I did reference the DNS
> resolution / DNSSEC problems.
>
> This was a very helpful conversation. And held constructively - thank
> you. 
>
> We will circulate the final doc asap.
>
> Warm regards,
> Susan
>
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net
> <mailto:marcoh at ripe.net>> wrote:
>
>     > On 30 Nov 2015, at 19:46, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
>     >
>     >> I fully agree with Patrik (and of course with Marco who
>     supports Patrik's comment). I believe we should mention the impact
>     of NAT64 in DNSSEC.
>     >> My only concern is that we will always be missing something...,
>     I mean, to satisfy everyone's point of view regarding NAT
>     (concepts, functioning, etc) will be almost impossible.
>     >
>     > Sure! Any alternative text that do explain that "NAT within a
>     protocol is ugly but easy, NAT between protocols is more
>     complicated" is fine with me. :-) Even if it is "catch all".
>
>     As we set out to write a non-technical document, I would not go
>     much further into detail. Also please realise that we are passed
>     deadlines, prefer not to open text any further.
>
>     Maybe we can include a footnote with a reference to a more
>     in-depth technical document that explains the finer details,
>     anybody got a pointer? Or if not possible to add to the text,
>     maybe we can ask the secretariat to add it to the list of
>     supporting documents already on the website.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Marco
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>     Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org <mailto:Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org>
>     http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151201/604f8b43/attachment.html>


More information about the Bp_ipv6 mailing list