From raja at nav6.org Mon Oct 4 10:19:48 2010 From: raja at nav6.org (Raja Kumar) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:19:48 +0800 Subject: [Rp2010] Argentina Hub Report In-Reply-To: <25047.90307.qm@web120506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <4C91CECB.4010604@asti.dost.gov.ph> <4C91D607.4020309@asti.dost.gov.ph> <4C92478C.1040206@apnic.net> <4C94111A.9060301@asti.dost.gov.ph> <25047.90307.qm@web120506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Dear all* **Apologies for this late report.** **Workshop Number: *157 *Title: *Best practices as a way of building capacity - what has actually been done to solve specific problems The above workshop was held in room no-5, on Thursday 16 Sep 2010, between 11.30 and 13 Vilnius time. Dr Shoko Mikawa, NTT Communications, Japan, - Remote Moderator The panel members who are stakeholders influencing the deployment of IPv6 in their country/region/global, shared their experience in contributing towards the deployment of IPv6. The session was lively, interactive and the panelist clearly identified in their experience what were the major constraints or problems encountered in deploying IPv6. In terms of 'capacity building' on IPv6 what were their contributions, what had the good influence among the community towards solving specific problems, their suggestions etc., This workshop session had two remote presentations/panel speakers. Due to some technical hiccups on-site, the two panel speakers couldn't deliver their presentation while can just see the session going. As the technical assist on-site were said to be swamped with request for assistance from many others they couldn't help at this situation. Otherwise, Marilia and team were very helpful, patient and tolerant to all the request made, the remote participation training were excellent and useful, appreciated. Dr Shoko Mikawa, - Remote Moderator, on-site had already completed the on-line survey form immediately after the above workshop. A great event! thanks to all. Cheers raja kumar, m. Workshop #157 organizer & contact person. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Anal?a wrote: > > Dear All, > > This is the final report for the Argentinean Hub in Buenos Aires. As I > informed before, we have two different ways to communicate the forum to the > civil and academic society. Firstly, we organize a live meeting with two > more NGO which deals with digital inclusion, and we actively participated in > the debate of workshop 66, on the future of privacy. The technical aspect of > the transmission went just perfect. We have as well the opportunity to > address to the panel a question, related to the RFID technology and privacy, > which had a very interesting feedback indeed, because we had two different > point of view of the panelist. The question was focused on the necessity of > changing the European rules governing privacy when using a RFID technology. > The discussion within the speakers ruled about the non necessity of such > change, because the UE directives already have privacy principles to be > applicable in a technology environment, being the RFID just a new > environment that might need to complemented with those principles. However, > on the other hand, the other point of view noted that sometimes those > principles would not be at first hand applicable to certain cases where the > RFID technology would be involved, therefore some new advance in both legal > and practical aspect of UE directives should modified in order to adapt its > application to this emerging technology. After the IGF transmission, we > continue discussing about privacy and consumer?s rights, mostly the > challenge for privacy rules to contemplate new situations that new > technologies. > > The rest of the transmission of the forum was done by a virtual platform > provided voluntary by a professor of our University. We did select different > workshops to transmit online and at the same time we discussed by chat what > was going on, and we address as well a question for one of our online > participant to the panel. We have to say that the promotion of the event had > a really good acceptance and that academics not only from Argentina but as > well from Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador participated from their countries, > and discussed about the workshops? themes. > > The participants were mostly interested in three subjects of the forum, > namely privacy, social networks, childhood and internet and cybercrime. As > hub organizer is was great to have as well the opportunity to chat on line > through Webex with a colleague from Brazil, who was really very interested > in changing experiences related to the work with childhood they are doing in > Brasilia. This was done during W. 140 > > We discussed on line as well, the challenges with the development of > E-government in Latino-America, as well as the new situations that Internet > allows to include in Society, such as equality of women and new > technologies, e-learning for access to education for developing countries, > the spread of new values and safety of environment. > > Finally, I want to express that this remote participation was extremely > important for access to information and both academic and stakeholders > discussion, as well as networking, even online. We are looking forward to > continuing this project next year and hoping as well to present remotely one > or more speakers to take part in the forum. > > Sincerely, > > Anal?a Aspis > > > _______________________________________________ > Rp2010 mailing list > Rp2010 at intgovforum.org > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/rp2010_intgovforum.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ls3031a at student.american.edu Mon Oct 4 14:08:17 2010 From: ls3031a at student.american.edu (Lindsay Shade) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Rp2010] Argentina Hub Report In-Reply-To: References: <4C91CECB.4010604@asti.dost.gov.ph> <4C91D607.4020309@asti.dost.gov.ph> <4C92478C.1040206@apnic.net> <4C94111A.9060301@asti.dost.gov.ph> <25047.90307.qm@web120506.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: We also apologize for our delay in reporting back. Here is our summary: Students Participate in Internet Governance Forum ?Remote Hub? - Washington, DC USA On September 15th and 16th, the Center for Resesearch on Collaboratories and Technology Enhanced Learning (COTELCO) at American University had the pleasure of facilitating remote participation in the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) held in Vilnius, Lithuania on those dates. COTELCO also joined the opening ceremony of the IGF on the 14th, and many members of the University community were drawn into the hub as they passed by. Students from throughout the Washington, DC area joined the COTELCO hub to participate in sessions on Access and Diversity, a Development Agenda Approach to Internet Names and Numbers, the follow-up meeting of IGF-USA, and the Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values. For many, remote participation in the IGF was a first introduction to global internet governance. Thus, students benefited immensely from the ?hub? environment, as they were able to discuss new concepts and ask questions of Professor Derrick Cogburn, Director of COTELCO and a leading scholar of internet governance. Participants were excited and impassioned by the discussions and the novel hub format, and some expressed interest in greater involvement in internet governance issues in the future. COTELCO looks forward to facilitating future remote participation events and further cultivating interest in internet governance in the next generation of young people who are now beginning to confront this complex web of relationships, responsibilities and concepts. Photos: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Raja Kumar wrote: > Dear all* > > **Apologies for this late report.** > > > **Workshop Number: *157 > > *Title: *Best practices as a way of building capacity - what has actually > been done to solve specific problems > > The above workshop was held in room no-5, on Thursday 16 Sep 2010, between > 11.30 and 13 Vilnius time. > > Dr Shoko Mikawa, NTT Communications, Japan, - Remote Moderator > The panel members who are stakeholders influencing the deployment of IPv6 > in their country/region/global, shared their experience in contributing > towards the deployment of IPv6. > > The session was lively, interactive and the panelist clearly identified in > their experience what were the major constraints or problems encountered in > deploying IPv6. In terms of 'capacity building' on IPv6 what were their > contributions, what had the good influence among the community towards > solving specific problems, their suggestions etc., > > This workshop session had two remote presentations/panel speakers. Due to > some technical hiccups on-site, the two panel speakers couldn't deliver > their presentation while can just see the session going. As the technical > assist on-site were said to be swamped with request for assistance from many > others they couldn't help at this situation. Otherwise, Marilia and team > were very helpful, patient and tolerant to all the request made, the remote > participation training were excellent and useful, appreciated. > > Dr Shoko Mikawa, - Remote Moderator, on-site had already completed the > on-line survey form immediately after the above workshop. > > A great event! thanks to all. > > Cheers > > raja kumar, m. > Workshop #157 organizer & contact person. > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Anal?a wrote: > >> >> Dear All, >> >> This is the final report for the Argentinean Hub in Buenos Aires. As I >> informed before, we have two different ways to communicate the forum to the >> civil and academic society. Firstly, we organize a live meeting with two >> more NGO which deals with digital inclusion, and we actively participated in >> the debate of workshop 66, on the future of privacy. The technical aspect of >> the transmission went just perfect. We have as well the opportunity to >> address to the panel a question, related to the RFID technology and privacy, >> which had a very interesting feedback indeed, because we had two different >> point of view of the panelist. The question was focused on the necessity of >> changing the European rules governing privacy when using a RFID technology. >> The discussion within the speakers ruled about the non necessity of such >> change, because the UE directives already have privacy principles to be >> applicable in a technology environment, being the RFID just a new >> environment that might need to complemented with those principles. However, >> on the other hand, the other point of view noted that sometimes those >> principles would not be at first hand applicable to certain cases where the >> RFID technology would be involved, therefore some new advance in both legal >> and practical aspect of UE directives should modified in order to adapt its >> application to this emerging technology. After the IGF transmission, we >> continue discussing about privacy and consumer?s rights, mostly the >> challenge for privacy rules to contemplate new situations that new >> technologies. >> >> The rest of the transmission of the forum was done by a virtual platform >> provided voluntary by a professor of our University. We did select different >> workshops to transmit online and at the same time we discussed by chat what >> was going on, and we address as well a question for one of our online >> participant to the panel. We have to say that the promotion of the event had >> a really good acceptance and that academics not only from Argentina but as >> well from Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador participated from their countries, >> and discussed about the workshops? themes. >> >> The participants were mostly interested in three subjects of the forum, >> namely privacy, social networks, childhood and internet and cybercrime. As >> hub organizer is was great to have as well the opportunity to chat on line >> through Webex with a colleague from Brazil, who was really very interested >> in changing experiences related to the work with childhood they are doing in >> Brasilia. This was done during W. 140 >> >> We discussed on line as well, the challenges with the development of >> E-government in Latino-America, as well as the new situations that Internet >> allows to include in Society, such as equality of women and new >> technologies, e-learning for access to education for developing countries, >> the spread of new values and safety of environment. >> >> Finally, I want to express that this remote participation was extremely >> important for access to information and both academic and stakeholders >> discussion, as well as networking, even online. We are looking forward to >> continuing this project next year and hoping as well to present remotely one >> or more speakers to take part in the forum. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Anal?a Aspis >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rp2010 mailing list >> Rp2010 at intgovforum.org >> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/rp2010_intgovforum.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Rp2010 mailing list > Rp2010 at intgovforum.org > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/rp2010_intgovforum.org > > -- Lindsay Shade MA Candidate, 2012 American University cell: 857-294-2015 Research Associate, Center for Research on Collaboratories and Technology Enhanced Learning Communities (COTELCO) www.cotelco.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naveed at pta.gov.pk Tue Oct 12 13:57:59 2010 From: naveed at pta.gov.pk (Naveed ul Haq) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:57:59 +0500 Subject: [Rp2010] Islamabad Remote Hub Report Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IGF Remote Particpation Hub Report.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 839141 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mariliamaciel at gmail.com Tue Oct 12 14:53:28 2010 From: mariliamaciel at gmail.com (Marilia Maciel) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:53:28 -0300 Subject: [Rp2010] IMPORTANT Remote moderators: last days to reply the survey Message-ID: Dear remote participation moderators, Firstly, let me thank you all once more for your work and cooperation. Remote participation in the IGF exceeded everybody?s expections and we have received very positive feedback from remote participants. Most of the hubs have already sent their reports to the list and the concrete results from this experience - from broader inclusion to the birth of new national IG forums - is amazing. And this is all thanks to YOU. We are finalizing the gathering of information for the report about remote participation in the IGF. *If you were a remote moderator, it is very important that you reply a short questionnaire*. It will take you about 5 minutes and it will be very important for improving remote participation. Please go to: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5RPBD9P Thank you very much! Mar?lia -- Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade FGV Direito Rio Center for Technology and Society Getulio Vargas Foundation Rio de Janeiro - Brazil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mariliamaciel at gmail.com Tue Oct 12 14:55:17 2010 From: mariliamaciel at gmail.com (Marilia Maciel) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:55:17 -0300 Subject: [Rp2010] Islamabad Remote Hub Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Naveed, It is not too late. We are still gathering data to the final report on remote participation and we are happy to include the views from Islamabad. Thank you very much for giving us your feedback. Best wishes, Mar?lia On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Naveed ul Haq wrote: > Dear All, > > My apologize for being too late for submission of the report. Please find > attached the remote hub report established at Islamabad. > > Best Regards, > > > Naveed-ul-Haq > Assistant Director (ICT) > Pakistan Telecommunication Authority > Headquarters , F-5/1 > Islamabad. > Ph: +92 (51) 9203911 > Fax: +92 (51) 9225368 > > _______________________________________________ > Rp2010 mailing list > Rp2010 at intgovforum.org > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/rp2010_intgovforum.org > > -- Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade FGV Direito Rio Center for Technology and Society Getulio Vargas Foundation Rio de Janeiro - Brazil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nadira.araj at gmail.com Tue Oct 12 16:45:18 2010 From: nadira.araj at gmail.com (Nadira Araj) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:45:18 +0200 Subject: [Rp2010] Palestinian Remote Hub: Visual report Message-ID: Dear Marilia, Dear All, I would like to share with you the visual report that I prepared about the Palestinian first experience as remote participants in the IGF in the URL below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEqfJHKygSo Marilia, I would like to ask if you need a written report from the Palestinian remote hub in addition to my daily reports that I used to post during the IGF event in Vilnius? All the best, Nadira -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From contact at againstcybercrime.eu Wed Oct 13 11:15:19 2010 From: contact at againstcybercrime.eu (contact at againstcybercrime.eu) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:15:19 +0200 Subject: [Rp2010] Toulouse (FR) Remote Hub Report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1286982919.4cb5cd076eef7@webmail.ovh.fr> Dear Marilia, We are really sorry for being late with our report! Please find attached our list of participants, our programme of the event and our report. Thank you for your support, Best regards, Yuliya TaC-Together against Cybercrime Representative +33607962530. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: liste des participants Toulouse 17.09.10..doc Type: application/msword Size: 111104 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TAC programme 2010 TLSE 100910.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 197167 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: report from Toulouse hub 17.09.10..pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 42905 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mariliamaciel at gmail.com Thu Oct 21 13:50:00 2010 From: mariliamaciel at gmail.com (Marilia Maciel) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:50:00 -0200 Subject: [Rp2010] IMPORTANT Remote moderators: last days to reply the survey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, I would like to thank all remote moderators who have answered the online survey about their experience with remote participation during the IGF Vilnius. We will be closing the survey on Saturday (23 October) at 23:00 GMT. If you have not yet done so, we would like to ask you to kindly answer it before this deadline. It will take you about 5 minutes. Your feedback is very important! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5RPBD9P Thank you very much Mar?lia On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote: > Dear remote participation moderators, > > Firstly, let me thank you all once more for your work and cooperation. > Remote participation in the IGF exceeded everybody?s expections and we have > received very positive feedback from remote participants. Most of the hubs > have already sent their reports to the list and the concrete results from > this experience - from broader inclusion to the birth of new national IG > forums - is amazing. And this is all thanks to YOU. > > We are finalizing the gathering of information for the report about remote > participation in the IGF. *If you were a remote moderator, it is very > important that you reply a short questionnaire*. It will take you about 5 > minutes and it will be very important for improving remote participation. > Please go to: > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5RPBD9P > > > Thank you very much! > > Mar?lia > > -- > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade > FGV Direito Rio > > Center for Technology and Society > Getulio Vargas Foundation > Rio de Janeiro - Brazil > -- Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade FGV Direito Rio Center for Technology and Society Getulio Vargas Foundation Rio de Janeiro - Brazil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: