[IGFmaglist] FW: IGF 2017 WS proposal statistics

[Wisdom Donkor]

Agree with Flavio 100%.

On Sunday, May 14, 2017, Flávio Rech Wagner <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br> wrote:

> I don't think we should disclose who were the evaluators of each proposal.
> This could lead to fingerpointing at individual MAG members by workshop
> proposers, which would be highly unfair, since we must assume that all MAG
> members will evaluate proposals in good faith and with the best of their
> capacities.
>
> We have collectively decided that each proposal would be evaluated only by
> 12 randomly selected MAG members. But we continue to be collectively
> responsible for the result of the evaluation of each proposal, as if all of
> us had evaluated each of them.
>
> This does not mean that the Secretariat should not keep the names of the
> evaluators of each proposal. This information, to be used only internally,
> may be useful for a later assessment of the new evaluation process.
>
> Best
>
> Flavio
>
> Em 14/05/2017 16:44, Renata Aquino Ribeiro escreveu:
>
> Hi
>
> I think publishing who were the evaluators is interesting.
> The more transparency, the better.
>
> Em 13/05/2017 18:33, "avri doria" <avri at acm.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri at acm.org');>> escreveu:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Been thinking of the process we are using. There may be concern in our
>> results based on normal suspicion of new methods.  One worry I have
>> already heard concerns the distribution of evaluators among the
>> stakeholders for each of workshops.
>>
>> It might be worthwhile documenting the randomization process that was
>> used and to create a some stats that show the distribution across
>> stakeholder groups for each of the sets of 11 evaluations done on a
>> workshop.
>>
>> We may even have to consider, for transparency sake, listing the names
>> of the MAG members who evaluated for each workshop.  In the past the
>> community knew everyone n the MAG had all worked on all of them and we
>> had collective accountability for the results.  Now they may wonder
>> exactly who evaluated their proposal.
>>
>> thanks
>> avri
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org');>
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing listIgfmaglist at intgovforum.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org');>http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>

-- 
*WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com
Skype: wisdom_dk
facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
Website: www.data.gov.gh
www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20170515/40fc64ba/attachment.htm>