[IGFmaglist] suggested workshop grading scale descriptions

[Susan Chalmers]

Dear MAG colleagues,

Based upon input from the last virtual meeting, how do the following
grading scale descriptions sit with everyone?

1 = proposal has serious problems
2 = should not be accepted
(2.5 = should be merged with another)
3 = borderline
4 = could be accepted
5 = must be accepted

Please don't hesitate to share your thoughts.

Sincerely,
Susan


Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150414/f3385f49/attachment.htm>