[IGFmaglist] Workshop proposal Evaluation

[Ricardo Pedraza]

+ 1 Veronica

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17/05/2014, at 2:28, Veronica Cretu <veronicacretu at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Chengetai, many thanks to  the Secretariat for the great document/compilation of the evaluations. 
> 
> This is going to be extremely useful for the work ahead of us! 
> 
> Looking forward to productive days ahead on the finalization of the IGF 2014 agenda! 
> 
> Many thanks,
> Veronica
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Chengetai Masango <cmasango at unog.ch> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please find attached:
>> 
>>  An excel file with the collation of the MAG workshop evaluations for our discussions next week. The file includes the grades; an indication whether the proposer, co-proposer or organizations base is from a developing, transitional economy or host country and links to a somewhat anonymized workshop description of the proposal.   A summarized version of comments made by the evaluators is also on the second line of each proposal record. It is organized in tabs  
>> An empty draft schedule. 
>> 
>> As I recall there was a tentative agreement to have no more than 10 concurrent streams for workshops (apart from the main sessions). After subtracting the 12 open forum requests + 7 Dynamic coalition requests + 4 best practice sessions that leaves 97 (98) slots free. If we take 97 slots as a starting figure for discussions then the base line cut off point is 3.642  giving us 97 workshops. (Adjustments may be made for developing countries or under represented areas)
>> 
>> The Secretariat has not taken into consideration space for the interregional dialogues (for regional and national IGF’s) and adjustments have to be made if the MAG wants to give best practices more time or if it is felt that the number of concurrent sessions have to be reduced when certain main/focus  sessions are taking place etc..
>> 
>> This is just a seed to the discussion. The Secretariat has also prepared an option and statistics which will be shown and explained at the start of the Tuesday session, again this is  for consideration and adjustment.
>> 
>> best regards 
>> 
>> Chengetai 
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Veronica Cretu 
> 
> President, Open Government Institute
> Republic of Moldova - http://opengov.si.md/
> 
> Member of the Steering Committee, 
> Open Government Partnership (OGP);
> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership
> 
> Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group
> To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549
> 
> Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN
> (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members
> 
> Email: veronicacretu at gmail.com and/or veronica at cretu.md
> Skype: veronicacretu 
> Phone: 373 067435000
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140517/9a2c8ec8/attachment.htm>